To Ganchrow...everytime I defend myself from the idiots that harass me, I am censured

Ganchrow · 01-01-08, 08:45 AM

Originally posted by curious

But they apparently have carte blanche to harass me all they want? Is that how it works here? I' ve noticed that the moderators, especially you, say NOTHING to the idiots who are constantly insulting and harassing me, but everytime I try to stand up to them you censure me. Why is that?

You claim I threatened the idiot in the post you site below. In what way is asking someone who follows me around from thread to thread talking shit to me to back up his big talk in person a "threat"?

If you are going to ban me, then ban me, don't make idle threats. I'm not going to stop defending myself from these assholes who are constantly harassing me, so best to ban me now and get it over with.

--snip--

Since you posted this publicly I'll assume it's OK for me to respond publicly.

First off, I'd to like to apologize for having made it personal with you a few weeks backs. As a moderator, I shouldn't have done that and I do apologize.

That said, I think it's clear to a large majority of posters and moderators on this board that -- for whatever reason -- either you seem to find trouble it seems to find you. There's nothing wrong with defending yourself in a mature fashion, but when every second or third or fourth post you make features either an insult or a threat ... the situation has clearly gotten well out of hand. Claiming that the other poster "deserved it" or "attacked me" first might work once (or maybe twice if you're in junior high school or prison). But after a certain point a reasonable person needs to come to the conclusion that it's not everyone else on the forum that's constantly starting trouble with you ... it's you constantly starting trouble with everyone else.

Although you received an infraction for that post in particular there were probably 5-10 posts you've made over the last couple of days for which you could just easily have been censured. Consider that that infraction was issued for all those in totality.

Listen, curious, no one's looking to "ban" you. But the way the infraction system works is that if you have a certain number of "infraction points" simultaneously outstanding, then you're automatically restricted to the "Private" forum for a period of (I believe) 10 days. I personally don't want to see this happen -- but if you don't start treating other posters with a bit more respect -- then I promise you it will.

So just chill out a bit and relax. Take a deep breath and realize that no one here is out to get you. And then maybe we can all get back to talking about sports betting. After all, I really do want to hear more from you about how I properly understand neither the Kelly criterion nor the marginal value of half points.

Regards and Happy New Year,
Ganchrow.

Jamie_UK · 01-01-08, 09:08 AM

Can Curious be banned please.

HedgeHog · 01-01-08, 09:21 AM

Originally posted by Jamie_UK

Can Curious be banned please.

It's only a matter of time. I'm setting the O/U at January 17. Personally I'd hit the Under hard, but this is just one idiot's opinion.

Jamie_UK · 01-01-08, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by HedgeHog

It's only a matter of time. I'm setting the O/U at January 17. Personally I'd hit the Under hard, but this is just one idiot's opinion.

1.01 , nailed on, bank job , fill ya boots , wheel barrow job IMHO.

remmy358 · 01-01-08, 10:55 AM

curious is {edit}

teazeman · 01-01-08, 11:11 AM

relax alice, too much negative karma.

if it helps i'll be your e-friend.

curious · 01-01-08, 11:40 AM

Originally posted by teazeman

relax alice, too much negative karma.

if it helps i'll be your e-friend.

I put all these idiots on ignore. This stupidity all started when I said in a thread that I was vehemently opposed to the WTO interfering in United States business and I thought that Antigua's threatening to steal the intellectual property of U.S. citizens and companies by ignoring copyrights and patents was an act of war. And, I said I was vehemently opposed to legalizing internet betting for offshore companies. So, about a dozen idiots crawled out of the woodwork to shout me down. Free speech on sbr it seems is only for opinions that the idiots like.

Anyway, I am done with these idiots. They are all on ignore.

Dark Horse · 01-01-08, 11:40 AM

People like curious are too old and set in their ways to change. Keeping him on is just postponing the inevitable, while giving him more chance to do damage (you only have to look at the way he's treating new members to see the ripple effect). He's an emotional baby in an adult physical body. Isn't there an age limit for posting here?

curious · 01-01-08, 11:42 AM

Originally posted by Dark Horse

People like curious...

Thank goodness for the ignore button.

HedgeHog · 01-01-08, 12:06 PM

Soon he'll have everyone on ignore and can only answer himself.

mofome · 01-01-08, 12:13 PM

nvm

durito · 01-01-08, 12:46 PM

This is how an exchange typically goes with Curious:

Curious: 5 * 4 = 37

Poster: Curious, 5 * 4 = 20

Curious: If you want to talk shit to my face I can arrange it.

Poster: Just trying to give you some info

Curious: Another poster for the ignore list.

MrX · 01-01-08, 12:56 PM

Originally posted by curious

Free speech on sbr it seems is only for opinions that the idiots like.

Free speech means you can say it, not that no one can disagree with you.

SBR Lou · 01-01-08, 01:02 PM

Curious is a good guy just misunderstood. The threats need to stop, though. It'd be a shame to see you end up like Bateman. Turn it around, pal.

SBR_John · 01-01-08, 01:13 PM

Originally posted by crazyl

Curious is a good guy just misunderstood. The threats need to stop, though. It'd be a shame to see you end up like Bateman. Turn it around, pal.

I pretty nuch agree with crazyl. Yea curious has said some rather over the top things in the past. But so what.

I think its a forumville thing but when guys get kind of close to the edge there are no shortage of guys willing to push them over.

curious · 01-01-08, 01:34 PM

Originally posted by MrX

Free speech means you can say it, not that no one can disagree with you.

Harassment is not disagreement.

curious · 01-01-08, 01:38 PM

Originally posted by crazyl

Curious is a good guy just misunderstood. The threats need to stop, though. It'd be a shame to see you end up like Bateman. Turn it around, pal.

How does asking someone who is constantly talking shit to you anonymously if they would like a chance to talk shit to your face constitute "making a threat"?

Sagarin · 01-01-08, 01:43 PM

Happy New Year

curious · 01-01-08, 01:58 PM

Originally posted by Sagarin

Happy New Year

what the *&^%$@ do you mean by that?

Happy New Year!!!

greek · 01-01-08, 02:27 PM

i agree somewhat , THE MOD SQUAD--DOES WAIT TIL THINGS GET OUT OF HAND AND THEN COME IN ,WITH THEIR OPINIONS WHICH ARE SOMESTIMES WRONG___ iam a nip in the bud type of person meaning the cops should jump in as soon as it seems like theirs, gonna be problems if they are gonna do their job right in the first place!!!!!!!!! no wit til its at its peak , ive had the same coplaint of just having to defend myself , why dont the cops defend us the right way?

2Pac · 01-01-08, 02:29 PM

Shutup, crybaby.

People only make fun of you becuase you're a moron.

HedgeHog · 01-01-08, 03:47 PM

Curious is misunderstood? He's the most understood poster here. Self-centered, self-righteous, argumentive blow hard. He doesn't need a push to go ever the edge; he's already past the point of no-return. He brings this crap upon himself.

curious · 01-01-08, 03:54 PM

Originally posted by 2Pac

Shutup, crybaby.

People only make fun of you becuase you're a moron.

Yep, thank goodness for that ignore button.

HedgeHog · 01-01-08, 04:00 PM

Originally posted by curious

Yep, thank goodness for that ignore button.

Do you even understand the concept of "Ignore"? Why respond?

imgv94 · 01-01-08, 04:15 PM

curious are you really older than 50?

pokernut9999 · 01-01-08, 04:55 PM

Hey Curious,

Dont worry about what others say about you.

I doubt any of them ever turned $2000 into $30,000+ like you did this year.

So if that is an example of a moron it is a good thing.

HedgeHog · 01-01-08, 05:00 PM

Originally posted by pokernut9999

Hey Curious,

Dont worry about what others say about you.

I doubt any of them ever turned $2000 into $30,000+ like you did this year.

So if that is an example of a moron it is a good thing.

You'd have a point if he ever collected. Instead, he's pissing it away at BJO.

curious · 01-01-08, 05:14 PM

Originally posted by imgv94

curious are you really older than 50?

No, I am not.

curious · 01-01-08, 05:15 PM

Originally posted by pokernut9999

Hey Curious,

Dont worry about what others say about you.

I doubt any of them ever turned $2000 into $30,000+ like you did this year.

So if that is an example of a moron it is a good thing.

Then after that I had to rollover $600,000 without losing my bankroll. I don't think any of these people who constantly harass me could have done that.

purecarnagge · 01-01-08, 06:34 PM

Wow I missed something. But f you can turn 2k into 30k lmk. I'll sign up asap.

Thremp · 01-01-08, 07:12 PM

Originally posted by purecarnagge

Wow I missed something. But f you can turn 2k into 30k lmk. I'll sign up asap.

I could teach a retard to do this in a year with 10 hours a week.

katstale · 01-01-08, 07:26 PM

Thremp my man, you will have a whole slew of pupils here who fit that description signing up for that class. You may have to rethink your generous offer!!

pokernut9999 · 01-01-08, 07:26 PM

Originally posted by Thremp

I could teach a retard to do this in a year with 10 hours a week.

Wow so you can put 2k in a sportsbook and 3 or 4 months later build it to 30k ?

HedgeHog · 01-01-08, 07:31 PM

Originally posted by pokernut9999

Wow so you can put 2k in a sportsbook and 3 or 4 months later build it to 30k ?

Still not impressed if you do it at a crap book and don't collect.