SBR went to the mat for the Bet Royal / SBG victims

ritehook · 10-25-07, 09:06 PM

Which, as far as sports betting forums go, this one is the best and deserves the support of all with online offshore accounts.

If these books advertised over at Rx Wil the Shill would be there to badmouth the complainer, or to rubber room or ban him.

Hap · 10-25-07, 09:34 PM

I really agree with Curious. SBR went to bat for us. When someone stands with you in a fight where the odds are against you, it is a great feeling.

Bill Dozer · 10-26-07, 08:10 AM

You guys are welcome. Hopes are high with BJO. Hopefully we will be thanking this new book in a few months!

We offered to rewrite SBG's rules and help them make the recent disputes go away. For a moment I thought they might see that this model won't work today. I still hope they will be forced to address these in the future.

HedgeHog · 10-26-07, 08:34 AM

Originally posted by Bill Dozer

You guys are welcome. Hopes are high with BJO. Hopefully we will be thanking this new book in a few months!

We offered to rewrite SBG's rules and help them make the recent disputes go away. For a moment I thought they might see that this model won't work today. I still hope they will be forced to address these in the future.

Wish BJO or some other Book would do the same thing for SB vics. Glad SBG vics got some relief; first real good news in awhile. Good job, SBR.

curious · 10-26-07, 09:20 AM

Originally posted by Bill Dozer

You guys are welcome. Hopes are high with BJO. Hopefully we will be thanking this new book in a few months!

We offered to rewrite SBG's rules and help them make the recent disputes go away. For a moment I thought they might see that this model won't work today. I still hope they will be forced to address these in the future.

edit

ritehook · 10-26-07, 09:43 AM

Originally posted by curious

I read that Eduardo's latest thing is that SBG customers cannot have subscriptions to paid handicapping services, because this makes them "sharp" bettors. I guess they only want customers who are totally clueless and are going to just throw their money away.

If Eduardo really thinks that those who subscribe to handicapping services are really "sharp," then he get the "Clueless of the Year Award."

curious · 10-26-07, 10:16 AM

Originally posted by ritehook

If Eduardo really thinks that those who subscribe to handicapping services are really "sharp," then he get the "Clueless of the Year Award."

edit

raiders72002 · 10-26-07, 10:18 AM

Props to SBR

20Four7 · 10-26-07, 07:28 PM

Originally posted by curious

I read that Eduardo's latest thing is that SBG customers cannot have subscriptions to paid handicapping services, because this makes them "sharp" bettors. I guess they only want customers who are totally clueless and are going to just throw their money away.

I guess all those sharp Dr. Bob bettors aren't welcome either. Curious did they post that somewhere in their rules? I find it funny in the Royal site you cannot view their rules etc when logged on. I guess they really hope their customers are clueless.

paul Mordeeb · 10-26-07, 07:33 PM

I get my picks from Stu Finer. So I shouldn't bet at SBG with them?

curious · 10-26-07, 07:40 PM

Originally posted by 20Four7

I guess all those sharp Dr. Bob bettors aren't welcome either. Curious did they post that somewhere in their rules? I find it funny in the Royal site you cannot view their rules etc when logged on. I guess they really hope their customers are clueless.

edit

curious · 10-26-07, 07:41 PM

Originally posted by paul Mordeeb

I get my picks from Stu Finer. So I shouldn't bet at SBG with them?

edit