So that's the head line of the artical I was reading then here is the last line....
" He also must pay a $500,000 fine in addition to the restitution already paid. "
So many odd things with this artical. Isn't the last line a better headline then the 30K? Restitution for what??? State Senitors that lost money on games he fixed??? I would have to track some of my old bets but I'm sure I'm at least owed $100 out of that!!
" He also must pay a $500,000 fine in addition to the restitution already paid. "
So many odd things with this artical. Isn't the last line a better headline then the 30K? Restitution for what??? State Senitors that lost money on games he fixed??? I would have to track some of my old bets but I'm sure I'm at least owed $100 out of that!!