There seems to be 2 trains of thought with this guy that get brought up in each of his threads and they're both pretty self-explanatory:
1. He works for the books and has been posting terrible plays to entice people to fade him so that when he posts good plays, people will automatically fade, thus losing their cash.
2. He really just picks TERRIBLE plays. I'm not talking about losing one or two because of bad luck - some of his picks are just awful.
My lean: #2. For a few reasons. One being he has no control where we place our bets so what incentive does a book have to plant someone here in that capacity? It's not like everyone in BookLand are mates and don't care where we spend our cash, as long as we do. As I said in another thread though, I honestly hope he is working for the books so he has income flowing in or at the very least not really betting any cash on his picks.
1. He works for the books and has been posting terrible plays to entice people to fade him so that when he posts good plays, people will automatically fade, thus losing their cash.
2. He really just picks TERRIBLE plays. I'm not talking about losing one or two because of bad luck - some of his picks are just awful.
My lean: #2. For a few reasons. One being he has no control where we place our bets so what incentive does a book have to plant someone here in that capacity? It's not like everyone in BookLand are mates and don't care where we spend our cash, as long as we do. As I said in another thread though, I honestly hope he is working for the books so he has income flowing in or at the very least not really betting any cash on his picks.