Do you look at stuff like this?

[fearless]

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/pickem;_ylt=AkNaB2YhKQv5_z6u5t_FvscgsLYF

How can you ignore stuff like this? The experts + yahoo users were 77-8 combined! That's good stuff.

[louisvillekid]

is that no spread?

[fearless]

is that no spread?

Yes but it's still useful for me because I usually only bet money lines. You?

[louisvillekid]

not much, i could see betting a ML if a spread is over 15, but usually you have to lay out like -800 or sometimes even -1000 just to pick up a buck. one time i looked into playing a 8 or 10 team parlay and was going to play all ML's, because all the fav's were -500 or better, it would of only payed like 300 for a $100 bet, i was like hell, i would be better off playing each game individually.

[jjgold]

useless

because most people using service are not bettors, they just point and click based on team names, colors, ect

Totally useless

[pokernut9999]

Only 7-8 vs lined games. Hell I was 18-8

[pico]

i do look at them just to see whether to take the underdog.

epsn has the expert picks on nfl...ml only...so pretty useless. i remmeber one guy went 13-0 one week, but he took a lot of chalk...so he only have to pick 3 or 4 good teams.

[imgv94]

thanks

[pokernut9999]

1 spread was 7
2 at around 14
1 at 18
15 at a zillion

not hard to be 17-2 SU there

[fearless]

1 spread was 7
2 at around 14
1 at 18
15 at a zillion

not hard to be 17-2 SU there

That's an oversimplification (see the Michigan game), anyways, we'll see how they do next week.

[pokernut9999]

That's an oversimplification (see the Michigan game), anyways, we'll see how they do next week.

Yea games like Michigan happen how often?

Those games were a joke they picked.

[imgv94]

Waking up in the morning is expensive.

[onlooker]

No.