Just talked to CS at betjam regarding rollover, but wanted further clarification...

[pags11]

has been since last basketball season that I played with these guys...I was told that the risk ammount counts towards the rollover, so long as it's not a money line of -200 or more...

so $110/ $100, $110 would count towards the rollover...can anyone else confirm this for me?...

[raiders72002]

That's correct. Some books will take the lower amount between risk and win.

[tacomax]

You're a professional, right?

I was told that the risk ammount counts towards the rollover, so long as it's not a money line of -200 or more...

1) Is the line you are betting on any + price or a - price between -101 and -199? If yes then goto 2. If not then it doesn't count towards the rollover.

2) The amount you are risking counts towards the rollover.

It took me a while to understand this difficult conundrum but I think I've done a Ganchrow-esque job here. If you're having trouble counting past 10 without using your fingers, give me a shout.

[pags11]

no tacomax, never have once claimed to be a pro gambler...

and reason I asked is so man books have gone to the smaller ammount over the past 6 months, and I don't always get 100% correct answers out of the CS departments...thanks raiders...

[spliff]

I'm surprised BetJam uses the risk amount, I thought most books used the lesser number no matter what.

Another reason to play there.

[pags11]

exactly spliff, which is why I was just double checking...good policy from a good book...

[steelerfan]

most books use the lower of risk and win

[pags11]

correct steelerfan, and many of them have gone to that in the past year or so (whereas they used the current betjam policy previously)...

[magnavox]

most books use the lower of risk and win

I wouldn't agree with that statement.

[magnavox]

has been since last basketball season that I played with these guys...I was told that the risk ammount counts towards the rollover, so long as it's not a money line of -200 or more...

so $110/ $100, $110 would count towards the rollover...can anyone else confirm this for me?...

A year ago you were certain that it's otherwise. As always, you did not learn your lesson.

[pags11]

magnavox,

thanks so much for your once a month piece of shit post!...you must not have much of a life that you have to dig up my old posts like this?...should I let the authorities know that I have a stalker?...

[Mudcat]

Nothing pags hates more than being held accountable for his own words. Funny link there magnavox.

Well hopefully pags, the authorities can help you with this stalker who shows up, as you say, once a month. Nothing worse than guys who show up once a month to raise awareness of quality issues.

Those once-a-month stalkers are eating our society alive.


(Seriously though, pags didn't just say someone posts once a month then in the very same sentence, imply it is stalking, did he? )

[moses millsap]

That's what you call a "spot stalker"

Thanks for the link mags.

[pags11]

nothing more than Mudcat hates than him having $10,000.00 on one side of a game and $9,999.99 on the other and then bragging to everyone that he has 20 dimes riding on the game like he's a big shot!...hahahahahaha...you are a joke!...

[pags11]

owned,

did you have to copy the same icon as mudcat 'cause you aren't smart enough to choose your own?...maybe you could come up with some original plays too?...

[sean72]

most books use the lower of risk and win

What a crock of shit most books use the risk amount