SBR Sportsbook sure is tight with "correlated" parlays.....

[Doug]

The Following Error Occurred:

Invalid Combination (Max Related Limit is: 0 )
[706] TOTAL u206-110 (LA LAKERS vrs MEMPHIS)
[706] MEMPHIS +105

[podunk]

good work john

[THEGREAT30]

Yes, you can't make them

[The Seer]

already tried it too

[THEGREAT30]

anyone know the reasoning behind books not letting you make correlated parlays

[Grandmaster B]

anyone know the reasoning behind books not letting you make correlated parlays

Bookmaker has no problem with it...even on halftime plays

[Doug]

anyone know the reasoning behind books not letting you make correlated parlays

correlated parlays win money, but this one has no correlation at all, and should be allowed.

NBA is never correlated enough to refuse a pointspread and total parlay.

[THEGREAT30]

Maybe I am wrong in my thinking that bookmaker is one of the worse A+. I may give them another try.

[Justin7]

A lot of books have no clue if something is highly correlated or not. If you can't tell, you shouldn't offer it.

[BigDaddy]

A lot of books have no clue if something is highly correlated or not. If you can't tell, you shouldn't offer it.

LOL!

so are you saying the guys at sbrsportsbook can't tell which ones are and which ones aren't correlated?


BTW doug they have been that way for a long time.

[Doug]

A lot of books have no clue if something is highly correlated or not. If you can't tell, you shouldn't offer it.

If you can't tell , you shouldn't be a bookie !

[SBR_John]

It actually IS correlated. The dog and under is always correlated. But in this case the correlation is not significant, it should be allowed. I'll see what the criteria is for hoops.

The SBR staff is doing a very good job running the book now after nearly losing the farm the first month. We knew a lot of theory on how to run a book but its a little different where the rubber meets the road. Its running better and better now though.

[THEGREAT30]

Good job John you are good man