Do You Like SBR Match Up Stats??

[jjgold]

???????????????

[SlickFazzer]

Scotty Landeua was the best i ever saw at utilizing match-up and trend stats.

[JohnAnthony]

You mean the match-up stats when you click the graph icon on SBRodds.com? Well, they are identical to what I have @ Pinnacle but I still prefer to use SBR's.

[pavyracer]

I don't use stats when I bet. I just look at the teams and judge if the spread is wrong. If it's off a lot I make a play.

[JohnAnthony]

I don't use stats when I bet. I just look at the teams and judge if the spread is wrong. If it's off a lot I make a play.

Are you a sharp pavyracer?

[pavyracer]

Are you a sharp pavyracer?

Yes. I picked two games under today. Wofford/Citadel and Samford/Elon. Both games ended 20-30 points below the posted totals which moved up. I studied zero stats.

[Cougar Bait]

I used to use stats. Now I just pour hot wax over my nipples and run my fingers over a Ouija board while I pleasure myself.

[BobHarvey]

JJ,

Back to the original question. I like the old stats/matchup program better. I believe it was Stat Fox.

[JohnAnthony]

Yes. I picked two games under today. Wofford/Citadel and Samford/Elon. Both games ended 20-30 points below the posted totals which moved up. I studied zero stats.

I know you are a sharp today. And yesterday?

[pavyracer]

I know you are a sharp today. And yesterday?

I won 5,000 points at the points sports book. I turned a $50 free play into $1000 twice.

[JohnAnthony]

I won 5,000 points at the points sports book. I turned a $50 free play into $1000 twice.

Well good job then. Just goes to show that there's more than one way to do this profitably..I've lost a ton following this and that system.

[minet123]

another vote for stat fox

[Richkas]

I know you are a sharp today. And yesterday?

Pavy is one of the sharpest on the web.

[LT Profits]

I used to use stats. Now I just pour hot wax over my nipples and run my fingers over a Ouija board while I pleasure myself.

That works for me.

[LT Profits]

Oh and I also preferred the old statfox matchups.

[SBR_John]

Have not used the match ups for baskets yet. I thought the football college match stats were good.

[The Seer]

Personally I think they suck. They need full schedules and alot of other stuff.

[odusmykal]

Pavy is one of the sharpest on the web.

Always solid..

[jgray]

Personally I think they suck. They need full schedules and alot of other stuff.

At a minimum.

[RichardMoss]

Previous version was powered by Stats Fox, now by Chalk. Are we getting votes on StatsFox due to...?, power ranking, the edge value on a team? Please go as deep as you want to, we can discuss both versions.

[RichardMoss]

LA Clippers vs Nuggets
Chalk version: http://twurl.nl/zcigqd
StatFox version: http://twurl.nl/t02gyw

[LT Profits]

I like the the Recent trends section of Statfox where it shows how teams have done in very specific situations, as those sometimes reveal something that might be missed by looking a just the raw numbers. Sure, some of it is meaningless like days of the week (LOL), but a lot of it is useful, such as how teams do vs. good defenses, when playing with no rest, etc...

[BobHarvey]

I agree with LT. Stat Fox offers the head to head matchups of this year and up to three seasons prior. The stats and the overall layout of SF is far superior IMO to what SBR has currently.

I think it's the best stats service out there but no one seems to carry it anymore. Is it the pricing?

[RichardMoss]

I think it's the best stats service out there but no one seems to carry it anymore. Is it the pricing?

It have to do with the leagues' coverage, where StatFox only offers major US leagues and the industry now demands a wider selection, per say, Soccer.

[BobHarvey]

Got you. I'd love to see it re-added. Maybe users could have it for the major sports. Just a thought.