Usc/ucla-imgv94 Lives In L.a. Let Me Help You

[imgv94]

WELL I THOUGHT I'D ADD MY INPUT HERE BEING THAT I AM FROM LOS ANGELES. I MEAN ALL THEY TALK ABOUT IS THE TROJANS ON SPORTS T.V HERE..I KNOW THESE TWO TEAMS!! USC IS GOING TO WIN!! I DESPISE HAVING TO
GIVE 21PTS IN ANY SITUATION BUT KEEP THIS IN MIND
UCLA IS RANKED 117TH IN THE NATION AGAINST THE RUN. USC HAS#5 DO I EVEN NEED TO SAY HIS NAME? #5 IS THE BEST RUNNING BACK IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,AND IS A SHOE-IN TO WIN THE HEISMAN TROPHY.ALSO UCLA IN THERE LAST 3 GAMES HAVE NOT LOOKED VERY GOOD GETTING BEAT 52-14 BY ARIZ
AND BARELY BEATING STANFORD AND ARIZ ST. BUT HERE IS THE ICING ON THE CAKE LOOK AT THE AMOUNT OF POINTS UCLA HAS GIVEN UP IN THERE LAST 6 GAMES-35,52,27,28,
41&40, AND LOOK AT HOW MANY POINTS USC HAS SCORED-50,35,51,55,51&34 IN THERE LAST 6 GAMES!! USC OFFENSE
AGAINST UCLA DEFENSE IS HUGE MISMATCH!! WITH THAT BEING SAID DOES USC-21 SOUND A LITTLE BETTER TO YOU?? PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR THOUGHTS??

[Senator7]

I don't see an edge either way in this game. I don't like betting on USC games because it could be close (like Notre Dame) or they could blow them out of the water (like Oregon). People forget that USC is only 5-6 against the number. They're a very inconsistent team from a betting standpoint. As far as public favorites go, Texas and Virginia Tech are much more reliable from a betting standpoint, with 9-2 records ATS. 21.5 is a bad number to bet on USC with as well. That basically means they have to win by 24, so you're giving up an extra 2.5 points because of that hook on the three touchdowns. There may be some value in USC -20.5 and some value in UCLA +21.5, but not enough either way to warrant a play from me. USC will win the game obviously, but I could easily see UCLA keeping it close or covering from the backdoor. The fact that this is a major rivalry game (its UCLA's Super Bowl) makes it even more unpredictable and unattractive from a betting standpoint.

I don't know about you guys, but it would be interesting to see USC, Texas, and Virginia Tech all go down this week. Can you imagine the wrench that would throw into the BCS Standings? Probably not going to happen, but it would be something.

[imgv94]

I don't see an edge either way in this game. They're a very inconsistent team from a betting standpoint. 21.5 is a bad number to bet on USC.That basically means they have to win by 24, There may be some value in USC -20.5 and some value in UCLA +21.5, but not enough either way to warrant a play from me. USC will win the game obviously, but I could easily see UCLA keeping it close or covering from the backdoor. The fact that this is a major rivalry game (its UCLA's Super Bowl) makes it even more unpredictable and unattractive from a betting standpoint.
.

FACT THAT USC REGULARLY SCORES 50PTS
A GAME AND UCLA GIVES UP 52 VS ARIZ, 44 VS
WASH ST & 40 VS CAL WITH THIS FACT U STILL
THINK USC ISN'T A GOOD BET? USC IS A GREAT BET!!
THOSE TEAMS DONT EVEN COME CLOSE
TO HAVING A LEINART,BUSH,OR THE UNDERRATED
OFF LINE THAT USC HAS??REGGIE BUSH VS THE 117TH
RANKED DEF VS THE RUN ISN'T THAT A GOOD
ENOUGH REASON?AND THE MAJOR RIVALRY ASPECT? I WILL KILL THAT-LOOK AT THE LAST 4 YEARS OTHER THAN LAST YEAR UCLA HASN'T KEPT IT CLOSE!!

12/4/04- USC 29 UCLA 24
11/22/03-USC 47 UCLA 22
11/23/02-USC 52 UCLA 21
11/17/01 USC 27 UCLA 0

[Mudcat]

I like that. "Look at the last 4 years other than last year."

Hey, why not look at the last 20 years, other than the times it didn't fit your theory.

With that kind of capping, you could probably hit at 100% other than the ones you get wrong.

[Razz]

I don't trust USC's defense enough to bet on them here, but I am on USC's team total points over 47.5.

[imgv94]

I like that. "Look at the last 4 years other than last year."

Hey, why not look at the last 20 years, other than the times it didn't fit your theory.

With that kind of capping, you could probably hit at 100% other than the ones you get wrong.

Your point was? And Who do you like? Whoever you are
mudcat- senator's point was the crosstown rivalry being
a factor,I showcased that 3 out of the last 4 years usc
destroyed ucla! whats wrong with that? i'd love to see
you explain that one?? bet you don't..

[clonecat]

I am staying away from this game. I thought USC would be 15 point favorites. When I saw the line, it told me Blow - Out.

Does the game really matter anyway. If USC wouldn't show up and lose, they would still play in the Rose Bowl

[tacomax]

I like that. "Look at the last 4 years other than last year."

Hey, why not look at the last 20 years, other than the times it didn't fit your theory.

With that kind of capping, you could probably hit at 100% other than the ones you get wrong.

[Senator7]

I like that. "Look at the last 4 years other than last year."

Hey, why not look at the last 20 years, other than the times it didn't fit your theory.

With that kind of capping, you could probably hit at 100% other than the ones you get wrong.

Sharp post!

[moses millsap]

The only thing I know about this game is that USC can probably rack up 500 yards rushing if they want, as a matter of fact, I think they could win this game without throwing a single pass.

[Razz]

The only thing I know about this game is that USC can probably rack up 500 yards rushing if they want, as a matter of fact, I think they could win this game without throwing a single pass.

Except Fresno and ND, they probably could have won every game this season either running the ball on every play, or not running at all.

[moses millsap]

Except Fresno and ND, they probably could have won every game this season either running the ball on every play, or not running at all.

UCLA's run defense is ATROCIOUS, of course, I'd like to see the upset, but I just can't fathom them stopping the USC running attack even with LW a little banged up.

[imgv94]

The only thing I know about this game is that USC can probably rack up 500 yards rushing if they want, as a matter of fact, I think they could win this game without throwing a single pass.

SEE OWNED THATS WHY I RESPECT YOU! YOU SEE
THE OBVIOUS! THATS WHY YOU AND ME ARE WINNERS

[imgv94]

Sharp post!

TOTALLY LOST ALL RESPECT FOR YOU SENATOR.
FOR YOU TO AGREE WITH MUDCATS POST SHOWED
ME WHAT YOUR ALL ABOUT. COMPLETELY PROVED
WRONG AND STILL LEAVES A SHORT LITTLE POST
SAYING SHARP? NONETHELESS AS ANOTHER
GUY ASKED DOES IT REALLY MATTER? MY
ANSWER IS=NO IT DOESN'T MATTER BUT I KNOW
ALOT OF PEOPLE TAKING UCLA BECAUSE THEY
THINK THE POINTS ARE TOO MUCH WHEN ACTUALLY
THEY ARE NOT AND I THINK I SHOWCASED THAT PLENTY
. ITS NOT MY FAULT SENATOR AND MUDCAT ARE
WHO THEY ARE..

[Senator7]

TOTALLY LOST ALL RESPECT FOR YOU SENATOR.
FOR YOU TO AGREE WITH MUDCATS POST SHOWED
ME WHAT YOUR ALL ABOUT. COMPLETELY PROVED
WRONG AND STILL LEAVES A SHORT LITTLE POST
SAYING SHARP? NONETHELESS AS ANOTHER
GUY ASKED DOES IT REALLY MATTER? MY
ANSWER IS=NO IT DOESN'T MATTER BUT I KNOW
ALOT OF PEOPLE TAKING UCLA BECAUSE THEY
THINK THE POINTS ARE TOO MUCH WHEN ACTUALLY
THEY ARE NOT AND I THINK I SHOWCASED THAT PLENTY
. ITS NOT MY FAULT SENATOR AND MUDCAT ARE
WHO THEY ARE..

You need to stop attacking people who simply disagree with you. All I said is that I don't an edge either way in this game and I worry about a backdoor cover.

When I said that Mudcat's post was sharp, it was because many people make the mistake of skewing data so they can interpret it to be the outcome they want. You can take any set of data and manipulate it to get the outcome you want and the outcome you're looking for. You see this a lot with guys who bet trends.

How was I completely proved wrong by saying that this game had no real edge and that I could see value on either side for the right price and number? Sorry to break it to you, but not everyone is always going to agree with you on here so just chill out and continue to engage in the healthy and helpful debate that only the SBR forum can provide!

[imgv94]

You need to stop attacking people who simply disagree with you.

When I said that Mudcat's post was sharp, it was because many people make the mistake of skewing data so they can interpret it to be the outcome they want.
How was I completely proved wrong by saying that this game had no real edge and that I could see value on either side for the right price and number? continue to engage in the healthy and helpful debate that only the SBR forum can provide!

WELL ATTACK IS A EXAGGERATION,BUT NONETHELESS
I WAS ATTACKED 1ST BY MUDCAT AND YOU DONT THINK
THAT DUM-DUM SKEWED WHAT I SAID? USC DESTROYED
UCLA 3 OUT OF THE LAST 4 YEARS WHAT IS WRONG
WITH THAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH SAYING EXCEPT
FOR LAST YEAR USC HAS DESTROYED THEM? I DONT
GET IT? AFTER READING THAT I THOUGHT ANYONE WITH
20 BRAIN CELLS WOULD LOOK AT THAT AND WONDER
WHAT HIS POINT WAS? BUT THEN (YOU)SENATOR CAME ON
HERE WHO I HAVE RESPECTED ALOT OF YOUR OPINIONS
IN THE PAST,BACKED WHAT HE WAS SAYING? WHICH
MADE ME WONDER? ABOUT YOU? BUT ANYWAY I'M NOT
GONNA FIGHT WITH YOU CAUSE WE DISAGREE I RESPECT
YOU SENATOR, AND I APOLOGIZE TO YOU. BUT STILL
USC HAS DESTROYED UCLA 3 OUT OF LAST 4 YEARS
AND I DIDNT SKEW THAT. ONE OTHER THING TO NOTE
MAYBE IS THAT IT IS RAINING HARD RIGHT NOW IN LA

[imgv94]

I Just Saw A Guy Predict Ucla Winning Game On Fsn
What An Idiot JUST TRYING TO BE DIFFERENT.

[CrazyHorse]

Why do you have the caps lock on 90% of the time? That makes your posts very difficult to read.

[onlooker]

Why do you have the caps lock on 90% of the time? That makes your posts very difficult to read.

I agree. Was about to say something about that myself.

[Illusion]

Why do you have the caps lock on 90% of the time? That makes your posts very difficult to read.

He must be a fan of BTJ

[imgv94]

He must be a fan of BTJ

The trouble with most of us is that we would rather be ruined by praise than saved by criticism.

who's btj?? thanks!!!

[Max Levine]

I thought USC 1H -13.5 was a decent bet.

Max

[jentude]

Im sorry, did you guys not watch USC this year? Did you see the points they gave up to arizona st? fresno? nd? Ucla has one of the best offense's in the nation, they arent going to try to stop usc, they are going to try to outscore them. SMART THINKING! I like ucla, and the points 21 1/2 . GO BRUINS

[imgv94]

Im sorry, did you guys not watch USC this year? Did you see the points they gave up to arizona st? fresno? nd? Ucla has one of the best offense's in the nation, they arent going to try to stop usc, they are going to try to outscore them. SMART THINKING! I like ucla, and the points 21 1/2 . GO BRUINS

24-3 USC 8:29 2nd qtr....

[misteve]

Imgv94: USC is looking good to me too, today. Can't remember what you picked, but I know you picked Texas and USC as big winners today. I won all three of mine so far, Tulsa, Navy, and Texas and hoping to win big on USC. Playing a couple more today to make huge money.
Do you have a feeling on the Fl International game? Fl Int +6 is tempting.
Also, are you all over VA TECH tonight?
Let's keep making the $$$!

[imgv94]

Imgv94: USC is looking good to me too, today. Can't remember what you picked, but I know you picked Texas and USC as big winners today. I won all three of mine so far, Tulsa, Navy, and Texas and hoping to win big on USC. Playing a couple more today to make huge money.
Do you have a feeling on the Fl International game? Fl Int +6 is tempting.
Also, are you all over VA TECH tonight?
Let's keep making the $$$!

THIS IS ONE WINNER TALKING TO ANOTHER
WINNER!!! WHATS UP STEVE. CHECK OUT MY
POST FL INTL IS THE OTHER IN MY PARLAY.
I HAMMERED TEXAS HARD!! BOY I HOPE
FLA INTL COVERS NOW I'LL BE IN GOOD!!
I LOVE THE 49ERS TOMORROW GOT A HUGE PARLAY
WITH TEXAS USC FLA INTL TO 49ERS ML+145
EXACTLY BRO LETS KEEP MAKING THAT $$$
EVERYBODY TALKING CRAP TO ME ON THESE POSTS
ARE LOSING $$$$...

[misteve]

Good luck imgv94 on Fl. International tonight...I'm going to pass on that this time, even though I respect your pick. I'm going with W. VA later on.

[imgv94]

Sharp post!

YEAH,SENATOR SHARP POST!!! MUDCAT WHERE
ARE YOU?? QUIET VERY QUIET WITH THE SCORE
51-6 IN THE 3RD QTR. REMEMBER WHAT THE TITLE
TO THIS POST WAS LET ME HELP YOU. I TRIED TO
HELP. SORRY GUYS!! AGAIN MUDCAT SHARP POST
BUDDY..

[jentude]

IMG, great call. Biggest problem i have is the absolutly horrible coaching of the ucla coach. goes for field goals against usc? punts with the ball on usc's 35? you saw usc go for it on 4th and 10 they didnt care, but your gonna puss out in the biggest game of the year! You lost the game right there coach! punt into the end zone and gain 15 yards wow. This guy reminds me of mooch from detroit!

[imgv94]

IMG, great call. Biggest problem i have is the absolutly horrible coaching of the ucla coach. goes for field goals against usc? punts with the ball on usc's 35? you saw usc go for it on 4th and 10 they didnt care, but your gonna puss out in the biggest game of the year! You lost the game right there coach! punt into the end zone and gain 15 yards wow. This guy reminds me of mooch from detroit!

Thank you. I know USC i live 10 mins away all
they do is talk about them here on TV RADIO etc.
the key to this game that well below average
cappers or like senator7,and mudcat failed to
get thru there heads was the fact that UCLa is
119th against the run!!! they failed to give that
consideration. thats why they aren't on here
well everyone who listened to me won again!!!
jen thank you! and you weren't on here earlier
so you are not included in the well below average
category that senator7 and mudcat were proven
into today!!

[Senator7]

YEAH,SENATOR SHARP POST!!! MUDCAT WHERE
ARE YOU?? QUIET VERY QUIET WITH THE SCORE
51-6 IN THE 3RD QTR. REMEMBER WHAT THE TITLE
TO THIS POST WAS LET ME HELP YOU. I TRIED TO
HELP. SORRY GUYS!! AGAIN MUDCAT SHARP POST
BUDDY..

Wow, you are so great IMGV94. You can actually pick a 22 point favorite. You must be a real sharp with that kind of talent. I don't really care about the USC game because I chose not to play it. I didn't have a betting opinion on the game. I didn't say USC wasn't going to cover, I simply said I didn't like the game and I didn't see an edge on either side. I just don't like laying 22 points with a team that's .500 ATS. The fact that I didn't play USC isn't going to ruin my 5-1 day any.

Mudcat's post was very sharp as it pertained to statistics. You really haven't been here long enough to be talking as much trash as you are. You've picked heavy favorites in every game you've called (in a year when favorites are dominating) and you won a 2 team 10 pt teaser. Big deal! I said this to one other person on here who was also very annoying: Humility is the best way to show people how great you really are. Think about it.

[Senator7]

Thank you. I know USC i live 10 mins away all
they do is talk about them here on TV RADIO etc.
the key to this game that well below average
cappers or like senator7,and mudcat failed to
get thru there heads was the fact that UCLa is
119th against the run!!! they failed to give that
consideration. thats why they aren't on here
well everyone who listened to me won again!!!
jen thank you! and you weren't on here earlier
so you are not included in the well below average
category that senator7 and mudcat were proven
into today!!

Well below average cappers like Mudcat and I? Please stop embarrassing yourself by making moronic comments like this.

[Quarm]

wb to the forum JJGold, if this guy is for real im gonna jump out of my window

[Senator7]

wb to the forum JJGold, if this guy is for real im gonna jump out of my window

Was thinking the exact same thing!

[imgv94]

ANSWER THIS QUESTION WHAT DID USC WIN BY??
BUT SEE THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FACT
AND OPINION. Fact is i did everything i could to convince
you guys that USC would win and win big! I'm doing people
a favor on here giving nothing but winners and great insight
on games.I've had alot of winners and have been on a roll.
I tried to help you Senator, If your not open to that or
think you know it all then thats shows alot.
USC 66 UCLA 19
your opinion was great senator.