to ganchrow and bill_dozer

[pico]

here is the screenshot of a wager i placed on pinnacle last year...the one i told you about pinny robbed me one dollar

[BuddyBear]

Okay how on earth was Kevin Milwood +224 to Jorge De La Rosa last year on a Royal team that lost 100 games...am I missing something there? Even this year Milwood would be no more than +140/+150 to the Royals and De La Rosa.

[onlooker]

Okay how on earth was Kevin Milwood +224 to Jorge De La Rosa last year on a Royal team that lost 100 games...am I missing something there? Even this year Milwood would be no more than +140/+150 to the Royals and De La Rosa.

You read it wrong BB. The Royals are underlined, so that is the bet and the +224. I had to read a few times to realize that, you had me wondering myself.

[BigBollocks]

He had the Royals for the game BB, and a damn good bet that was win or lose. I think you just saw the third line next to the bet stake and assumed he had the Rangers. His bet is underlined, although it's difficult to remember it's been so long since pinny left US customers

[BuddyBear]

i see...i was reading "Rangers for Game" +224.....

[JAHgger4noz]

Okay how on earth was Kevin Milwood +224 to Jorge De La Rosa last year on a Royal team that lost 100 games...am I missing something there? Even this year Milwood would be no more than +140/+150 to the Royals and De La Rosa.

Yea that was a little misleading. I also thought how the hell was Milwood at +224. But the way he's been pitching this year, +224 is about what he deserves on the ML! Even on his wins, he's giving up more than 4 runs and 80% of his games are 9 and up for the Over/Under Totals.

U got robbed for more than a dollar pal. U got robbed of a Dollar PLUS change, talk about kicking the nuts even harder. So did u get the money back? And I thought Pinnacle was so highly regarded. The Cream of the Crop.

If Milwood is ever scheduled to pitch against the Royals, I will gladly take KC and KC on the run line. 4 of Milwoods 5 loses have them losing by more than 2 runs.

[slash]

What's the point?? Pinnacle posts such dummy wagers from time to time.

[ion]

The bet was cancelled, so Pinnacle returned the $1.76. Pinnacle "robbed" him one dollar only if you believe the bet should have been a winner. I don't.

[Bill Dozer]

next time put it in a parlay...make it interesting

[pico]

The bet was cancelled, so Pinnacle returned the $1.76. Pinnacle "robbed" him one dollar only if you believe the bet should have been a winner. I don't.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/33110-pinny-post-bet-pic.html#post286982

[ion]

Now, it's cristal clear. Thanks

[Arilou]

I don't know about Test, but there's no question Dummy started.

[pico]

I don't know about Test, but there's no question Dummy started.

the reason i think i won this event is because, it is "do not wager" vs "on this event". since "on this event" is underlined, that means "on this event" beat "do not wager"...this is how pinnacle show winners and losers on their sheet. since "do not wager" lost that event, that means my bet should be valid since "do not wager" did not come through. "on this event" won so i should win on that event.

follow my logic?

plus "on this event" is the favorite, i should win it.