colts @ jags +3?!?

iceminers26 · 12-16-09, 05:48 AM

Jags +3 or no play IMO, line looks like the Colts will lose their 1st, but so did the Balty line earlier on in the season.

Hells Kitchen · 12-16-09, 07:01 AM

Post in NFL forum ala SBR Johns post

Chi_archie · 12-16-09, 07:32 AM

colts have everything locked up. will they be resting players?

Jacksonville is fighting for their wildcat berth.....

line seems to be right on, hard to NOT take the points AND the ml at this point

iceminers26 · 12-16-09, 07:36 AM

I saw an interview yesterday where Indy's coach stated he would play this game like any other week and starters will play the full time, take it for what you want, but that' what he said.

With that said, would still rather back a team fighting for their playoff life than a team trying to have a perfect record.

KC · 12-16-09, 07:50 AM

Jags usually play Colts tough, but only 3?

Wrigley · 12-16-09, 08:39 AM

Like colts they want to go 16-0 even though they act like its no big deal

Irish Lumberjack · 12-16-09, 09:30 AM

i like the colts in this spot, why? because they're the colts

LT Profits · 12-16-09, 09:48 AM

But they are NOT the Colts. LOL

Despite what Caldwell said publicly, this cheap line tells me the regulars will not play the whole game. Yes, he will probably play Manning a lot longer than Dungy did when he had things wrapped up, but I still doubt he plays more than a half.

As for going undefeated, that is totally overrated and not worth the effort. Save those emotions for the post-season, as the worst thing that can possibly happen is finishing the regular season unbeaten and then coming up flat when it matters the most.

Remember when the Patriots went 16-0, even before they lost to the Giants, they were not overly impressive in their two playoff wins and did not cover a single post-season spread.