Andy Roddick v Andrew Murray

[uPaxus]

Any thoughts?

Thanks

[bigboydan]

I like Murray +120 in this match.

[uPaxus]

I like Murray +120 in this match.

Thank you my friend.

[tribet]

Murray to beat the 1 trick pony in 3.

[Tchocky]

1. Roddick -138
2. Roddick -2 games -102
3. Over 22.5 games -133

[Santo]

Murray was sub-par last match, don't know how much of that carries forward. Line may be about right.

[Poventino]

Close Match, but I think A. Roddick should come out on top.

GL

[Tchocky]

Roddick retires after pulling a hamstring. Murray faces either Nadal or Djokovic in the semis.

[tribet]

Like FedX Murray has Roddicks number.

[jjgold]

Roddick has played better and still is a top 5 player but he never had the real killer instincts to be big time.

[vanman]

Roddick has played better and still is a top 5 player but he never had the real killer instincts to be big time.

I think you will find that until federer came along roddick was world no1,but he is still a one trick bone head.

[uPaxus]

Roddick did not look good from the get-go.

I had Roddick to win the match and one of my books graded it as a lose. I personally that all Books would of graded it as a Void. Surprise, surprise. Learn something new everyday.

Thanks for the feedbacks in this thread.

[Santo]

There are a few different variations in tennis rules, you need to check what you're betting into, different rule sets suit different situations.

- One ball completed
- One set completed
- Two sets completed
- Match completed

[Preussen]

I've come across a book that also made a difference between a retirement due to injury and a disqualification but I cannot remember the book or the exact rules right now.

[Tchocky]

Roddick did not look good from the get-go.

I had Roddick to win the match and one of my books graded it as a lose. I personally that all Books would of graded it as a Void. Surprise, surprise. Learn something new everyday.

Thanks for the feedbacks in this thread.

That's bullshit! The wager should have been cancelled. I know some places grade the wager as the player to advance but I don't agree with this rule. Every book has their own rules and you should become familiar with them before you wager.

[tribet]

Roddick did not look good from the get-go.

I had Roddick to win the match and one of my books graded it as a lose. I personally that all Books would of graded it as a Void. Surprise, surprise. Learn something new everyday.

Thanks for the feedbacks in this thread.

Was it Expekt by any chance.

[uPaxus]

Was it Expekt by any chance.

Tribet, It was Ladbrokes. I know for the next time. Out of 3 Books that I placed bets on the match, they were the only one that didn't grade it as a Void.