Got a question for Dr. Bob? Post it here.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pavyracer
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 04-12-07
    • 82905

    #36
    Dr Bob,

    If I get an erection lasting more than 4 hours without taking any erectile dysfunction drugs what should I do?
    Comment
    • iLogan
      SBR Sharp
      • 10-11-09
      • 357

      #37
      Originally posted by Bread
      sat⋅ire

       /ˈsætaɪər/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sat-ahyuhr] Show IPA Use satire in a Sentence

      See web results for satire

      See images of satire

      –noun 1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.



      Learn it. Dumbass.
      I can use google too, haha
      Comment
      • iLogan
        SBR Sharp
        • 10-11-09
        • 357

        #38
        Originally posted by mmike032
        I think it went over his head
        Lol @ this dick rider.
        Comment
        • Bread
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 03-16-08
          • 23726

          #39
          Calm down angry new guy.
          Comment
          • iLogan
            SBR Sharp
            • 10-11-09
            • 357

            #40
            Originally posted by Bread
            Calm down angry new guy.
            Ok sorry old guy
            Comment
            • stats13
              SBR MVP
              • 06-29-09
              • 1687

              #41
              what is funny is for the first time in a long time i perused dr bob's site today and came across this gem. I mean, wtf does this mean? who did he like?

              Boise has pretty big edges regardless of which team has the ball and my math model gives the Broncos a very good 57% chance of covering the spread in this game. However, Tulsa applies to a very strong 49-10-2 ATS home underdog momentum situation that is 9-0 ATS since I discovered it. Boise, meanwhile, applies to a negative 34-86-4 ATS road letdown situation and Tulsa has a 59% chance of covering a fair line based on the situations. Overall, Tulsa is about a 52% play and the under looks like a pretty good play.
              Comment
              • xyzky
                SBR MVP
                • 08-23-07
                • 1577

                #42
                You really are that dumb...
                Overall, Tulsa is about a 52% play and the under looks like a pretty good play.
                Comment
                • stats13
                  SBR MVP
                  • 06-29-09
                  • 1687

                  #43
                  Originally posted by xyzky
                  You really are that dumb...
                  Overall, Tulsa is about a 52% play and the under looks like a pretty good play.
                  so what happened to the broncos having a 57% chance of covering?
                  Comment
                  • durito
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 07-03-06
                    • 13173

                    #44
                    can you read?
                    Comment
                    • stats13
                      SBR MVP
                      • 06-29-09
                      • 1687

                      #45
                      Originally posted by durito
                      can you read?
                      yes, i can. the translation from dr bob is: i'm playing both sides of this fence so that i'm correct either way and thus you will be more likely to pay me $2k a season for picks.
                      Comment
                      • spongerat
                        SBR MVP
                        • 10-01-08
                        • 2023

                        #46
                        wrong, theres a reason hes one of the only touts that is actually EV+
                        Comment
                        • durito
                          SBR Posting Legend
                          • 07-03-06
                          • 13173

                          #47
                          Originally posted by stats13
                          yes, i can. the translation from dr bob is: i'm playing both sides of this fence so that i'm correct either way and thus you will be more likely to pay me $2k a season for picks.
                          i take it english isn't your first language
                          Comment
                          • koby25
                            SBR MVP
                            • 10-14-08
                            • 1507

                            #48
                            I want to know why your name is Dr. Bob? Are you a doctor?

                            I should change my name to Dr. Koby
                            Comment
                            • LT Profits
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 10-27-06
                              • 90963

                              #49
                              Originally posted by stats13
                              what is funny is for the first time in a long time i perused dr bob's site today and came across this gem. I mean, wtf does this mean? who did he like?

                              Boise has pretty big edges regardless of which team has the ball and my math model gives the Broncos a very good 57% chance of covering the spread in this game. However, Tulsa applies to a very strong 49-10-2 ATS home underdog momentum situation that is 9-0 ATS since I discovered it. Boise, meanwhile, applies to a negative 34-86-4 ATS road letdown situation and Tulsa has a 59% chance of covering a fair line based on the situations. Overall, Tulsa is about a 52% play and the under looks like a pretty good play.
                              The 57% for Boise is ONLY what his math model spit out. The 52% on Tulsa was his official conclusion combining all factors.
                              Comment
                              • pavyracer
                                SBR Aristocracy
                                • 04-12-07
                                • 82905

                                #50
                                Originally posted by LT Profits
                                The 57% for Boise is ONLY what his math model spit out. The 52% on Tulsa was his official conclusion combining all factors.
                                To make it a little bit clearer. When he flipped a nickel 100 times it landed 57 times on Boise. When he flipped a dime 100 times it landed 52 times on Tulsa.
                                Comment
                                • suicidekings
                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                  • 03-23-09
                                  • 9962

                                  #51
                                  Originally posted by pavyracer
                                  To make it a little bit clearer. When he flipped a nickel 100 times it landed 57 times on Boise. When he flipped a dime 100 times it landed 52 times on Tulsa.


                                  Come on now Pavy. Dr. Bob is big time. He only flips silver dollars.
                                  Comment
                                  Search
                                  Collapse
                                  SBR Contests
                                  Collapse
                                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                  Collapse
                                  Working...