All The Sharps Had The UNDER Tonight...

Jimmy0607 · 10-14-09, 10:32 PM

only if we would've thrown that ball like a man, oh well

pavyracer · 10-14-09, 10:33 PM

Fishhead had the over but you won't see onthewhat making any threads about it. Trust me.

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by Shortstop

I even got a horrible line last night at 52.5 and it still cashed easily.

what a joke of a thread........when you're "SHARP" plays lose do you post threads pointing that out?....

Don't go around making cocky posts about being a sharp unless you do the same and call yourself a square when you lose. Don't make me beat you in a capping competition too

lakerboy · 10-14-09, 10:35 PM

Originally posted by pavyracer

Fishhead had the over but you won't see onthewhat making any threads about it. Trust me.

Fishhead should refund all of those that followed him. He buried the whole points forum and Rich Boy is laughing his head off.I laughed earlier in that thread how people were all taking the over. Only 1 person had the under ^^^^^^

Shortstop · 10-14-09, 10:36 PM

Originally posted by Dbldown11

what a joke of a thread........when you're "SHARP" plays lose do you post threads pointing that out?....

Don't go around making cocky posts about being a sharp unless you do the same and call yourself a square when you lose. Don't make me beat you in a capping competition too

Who the fukk are you? You had the Over obviously. Sorry for your loss.

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:38 PM

Originally posted by Shortstop

Who the fukk are you? You had the Over obviously. Sorry for your loss.

Nope didnt play the game...the side or the total. I just hate cocky people that post stupid shit about being sharp cause they make a right pick, knowing that you dont call yourself out when you lose.

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:39 PM

Originally posted by Shortstop

Who the fukk are you? You had the Over obviously. Sorry for your loss.

And I'll tell you who I'm not...I'm not someone that has been a member for less than a year with over 6,000 posts. Now that's a joke

Shortstop · 10-14-09, 10:40 PM

Originally posted by Dbldown11

And I'll tell you who I'm not...I'm not someone that has been a member for less than a year with over 6,000 posts. Now that's a joke

You're the joke, I've never heard of you, now get lost guy.

L2Gunz · 10-14-09, 10:41 PM

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:42 PM

Originally posted by Shortstop

You're the joke, I've never heard of you, now get lost guy.

You've never heard of me cause it's a gambling forum and I post picks and thoughts in the respective sporting threads. I dont compile 6,000 posts in 10 months jabbering about being a "sharp" cause I picked an under in a game.

DrStale · 10-14-09, 10:45 PM

Originally posted by Shortstop

I even got a horrible line last night at 52.5 and it still cashed easily.

I had the under as well, but saying it "cashed easily" certainly isn't true. There were plenty of times that either team could have scored late and the game jumped out to a lot of points early. That overthrown deep ball from Boise to a wide open receiver in the 4th quarter springs to mind.

Intuitive_Edge · 10-14-09, 10:45 PM

BSU left points all over the place.. it should have went over with ease. It happens.. but to say it was a sharp play is beyond retarded. Boise State got lazy it cost the over/cover plain and simple.

Richkas · 10-14-09, 10:47 PM

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:47 PM

there is no such thing as sharps or squares....only winners and losers

L2Gunz · 10-14-09, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by Intuitive_Edge

BSU left points all over the place.. it should have went over with ease. It happens.. but to say it was a sharp play is beyond retarded. Boise State got lazy it cost the over/cover plain and simple.

very true

L2Gunz · 10-14-09, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by Richkas

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:47 PM

just like my Florida pick on Saturday was a "square pick".....but wait it won? So should I have been on LSU since they were the sharp side?

Intuitive_Edge · 10-14-09, 10:48 PM

Originally posted by Shortstop

You're the joke, I've never heard of you, now get lost guy.

You never heard of Dbldown11 ? Are you serious ? Get the hell outta of PT and you'd see real people talking about sports

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:49 PM

Originally posted by Intuitive_Edge

You never heard of Dbldown11 ? Are you serious ? Get the hell outta of PT and you'd see real people talking about sports

Thanks bud. Problem is most people on this site arent interested in real discussion of games which is what used to take place much more frequently

Shortstop · 10-14-09, 10:53 PM

To all the squares that had the OVER, I am truly sorry for your loss.

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 10:54 PM

Originally posted by Shortstop

To all the squares that had the OVER, I am truly sorry for your loss.

did you call yourself a square last night after your loss with the over?

Shortstop · 10-14-09, 10:57 PM

Originally posted by Dbldown11

did you call yourself a square last night after your loss with the over?

Yes, I called myself a square.

tripp · 10-14-09, 10:58 PM

Not many of the sharps I know touched the total here. A lot on Tulsa and a few were on Boise. To me Boise was the best play in this game, Tulsa and under just happened to be the winning plays.

Congrats on cashing your play, however.

FreeFall · 10-14-09, 11:00 PM

U56 @ The Greek

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 11:06 PM

And one more thing...if there wss such a thing as a "sharp"...I would think they wouldn't bet a line at 52.5 when it was on its way up.....

wal66 · 10-14-09, 11:08 PM

When the masses are on one side. When the line opens at a lower number than it probably should and there are no apparent injuries. When you recognize these indicators and go the opposite of what seems like an easy win.................isn't that kind of sharp?

I only ask because I pointed all these things out in my thread.

Got very fortunate but still pointed out several reasons for looking int Tulsa.

Shortstop · 10-14-09, 11:10 PM

Originally posted by wal66

When the masses are on one side. When the line opens at a lower number than it probably should and there are no apparent injuries. When you recognize these indicators and go the opposite of what seems like an easy win.................isn't that kind of sharp?

I only ask because I pointed all these things out in my thread.

Got very fortunate but still pointed out several reasons for looking int Tulsa.

Great post. The total climbed from 52 to 56 for no apparent reason.

Dbldown11 · 10-14-09, 11:11 PM

Wal that's a winning play....there are losers and winners not sharps and sqaures....I've seen too many "shar" plays lose and had too many of my plays get called "square" and win....that's why I say that

wal66 · 10-14-09, 11:14 PM

DblDown it's October and I was a square last week so I wanna be a sharp this week. Kind of like being a an goofy kid before Halloween and a goofy kid with candy on Halloween.

BobHarvey · 10-14-09, 11:21 PM

Originally posted by Dbldown11

there is no such thing as sharps or squares....only winners and losers

That's one of the smartest things I've ever heard on this forum. Couldn't agree more.

G's pks · 10-14-09, 11:37 PM

Zboiz returned and his first pick was the over...anyone who saw that knew they were doomed...just like old Dac... who finally left...

Hotdiggity11 · 10-14-09, 11:45 PM

If this had been created after the first quarter, I would have been amazed. Instead, it is just post-game gloating.

20Four7 · 10-14-09, 11:49 PM

I would have glady given up my under if I cashed my tulsa +325 bet.....

Shortstop · 10-14-09, 11:56 PM

Originally posted by Hotdiggity11

If this had been created after the first quarter, I would have been amazed. Instead, it is just post-game gloating.

Originally posted by Shortstop

99-70-0 +26.17

NCAA College Football

Boise State @ Tulsa

Under 52.5 (+110) Matchbook

Originally posted by Shortstop

I like the Under 53.

I'm seeing a 28-21 type of game.