If you're on Dallas..

Mikail · 09-28-09, 07:40 PM

I agree with the King

paco · 09-28-09, 07:41 PM

Pal, we had our differences in ur picks but i hope u are correct tonight

Limey · 09-28-09, 08:37 PM

I still don't think there is any such thing as 'square' or 'sharp' bets.

The last stat I saw had 59% of bets on this game were carolina +9, does that mean Carolina is the so-called 'square' bet?

pokernut9999 · 09-28-09, 08:44 PM

All I know is neither team is picking apart anyone.

spurginobili · 09-28-09, 10:34 PM

Doc JS · 09-28-09, 10:35 PM

Originally posted by Enogsiwon

If you're on Dallas.....I'm sorry to be the one to tell you, but,

YOU'RE A

WINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!

Afrot69 · 09-28-09, 10:36 PM

dallas wins

G's pks · 09-28-09, 10:37 PM

what an idiot!

G's pks · 09-28-09, 10:37 PM

Originally posted by Enogsiwon

...I'm sorry to be the one to tell you, but,

YOU'RE A SQUARE!!!!

Panthers have seen two good defenses in Eagles and Falcons..They'll pick apart the Cowboys secondary and COVER easy..

Tons of value in the Panthers ML

~~King~~

[strike]QUEEN!

SamsNCharge99 · 09-28-09, 10:38 PM

The King is now 11-1 in BTP

COWBOYS DO WORK

Slim · 09-28-09, 10:40 PM

Lucky Dallas cover. Pick 6 saved their ass.

masr · 09-28-09, 10:43 PM

Jake delhomme sucks...when the panthers gonna get rid of him!!

PorkChop · 09-28-09, 10:44 PM

Where was carolinas running game. The game was not Jake Delhommes fault. Both INT's were his WRs fault. Both teams played sloppy and looked like shit.

chrisharvard01 · 09-28-09, 10:44 PM

Enog, if I'm so square why does my BR seem so large?

DALLAS -6 (-160)!!!!!!!!!!

Robyn · 09-28-09, 10:46 PM

Mikail · 09-28-09, 10:48 PM

Even squares win

ChuteBoxe · 09-28-09, 10:51 PM

Technically, squares lose money.

masr · 09-28-09, 10:52 PM

Originally posted by PorkChop

Where was carolinas running game. The game was not Jake Delhommes fault. Both INT's were his WRs fault. Both teams played sloppy and looked like shit.

Panthers are 0-3 , In 3 games Delhommo has 1 TD and 5 Int... I know WR didnt cost them other games..........DELHOMME SUCKS

Mikail · 09-28-09, 10:55 PM

Originally posted by masr

Panthers are 0-3 , In 3 games Delhommo has 1 TD and 5 Int... I know WR didnt cost them other games..........DELHOMME SUCKS

Delhomme is horrid!

Iwinyourmoney · 09-28-09, 11:09 PM

I feel like a circle after that win, I don't have 4 corners

chrisharvard01 · 09-28-09, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by Mikail

Even squares win

yeah, all the squares were on dallas.

stupid squares.

why can't we all be pros like you and lose money

you fu_cking jackoff. why don't you PM me your next play so I can put 10u on a fade

khaden · 09-28-09, 11:25 PM

THIS IS WHAT I POSTED IN ANOTHER THREAD BEFORE THE GAME STARTED:
[COLOR=#000000 ! important]
Delhome had to have a good game to start the year against philly and he was worse than he was in the playoffs, he then had to have a good game and win against atlanta and they didn't, if they had any option in a backup qb he would be benched-they have no choice but to play him.

Romo had a bad game last week against the giants who you could argue might be in the super bowl this year and dallas still almost won the game. They scored what like 21 or 24 pts of off turn overs--not to mention every stupid bounce of the ball went against dallas. Plus the cowboys shut down the giants rushing who is one of the best rushing teams in the nfl--. Which brings us back to they should be able to shut down the panthers run game and make delhome try to win the game--which he can't.

I think romo will be playing with chip on his shoulder tonight as opposed to delhome playing with zero confidence and looking not to make any mistakes. There is a big difference in those two mentaliites. As much as this game is tough to call i keep coming back to dallas winning big.[/COLOR]

AS YOU CAN SEE CAROLINA COULD NOT RUN THE BALL AND HAD TO RELY ON DELHOMME--WHICH MEANT HE THREW 2 PICKS ONE FOR A TD, AND A FUMBLE. PLUS HE WAS MISSING OPEN RECEIVERS.

DALLAS RAN THE BALL DOWN THEIR THROATS AND ACTUALLY LEFT 11 PTS OFF THE BOARD-ONE MISSED FIELD GOAL, AND BEING ON THE ONE YD LINE TWICE AND MAKING TERRIBLE PLAY CALLS. IN REALITY THE SCORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN 31-7.

AS FAR AS BEING A SQUARE--A SHIT LOAD OF "SHARPS" WERE ON CAROLINA AND LOST. HOW THAT OLD SONG GOES "I GUESS IT'S HIP TO BE SQUARE"

G's pks · 09-28-09, 11:25 PM

Originally posted by chrisharvard01

yeah, all the squares were on dallas.

stupid squares.

why can't we all be pros like you and lose money

you fu_cking jackoff. why don't you PM me your next play so I can put 10u on a fade

Mikail · 09-28-09, 11:29 PM

Originally posted by chrisharvard01

yeah, all the squares were on dallas.

stupid squares.

why can't we all be pros like you and lose money

you fu_cking jackoff. why don't you PM me your next play so I can put 10u on a fade

U sorry excuse for a man take your square win and be happy. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Get it right foolish man, I MAKE MONEY. Like I said even square bettors will win on occasion!

khaden · 09-28-09, 11:39 PM

Can someone please tell me what a "square better" actually is. Does it mean betting on popular teams that the public likes? Aren't we the public when we place the bet. I never had my book or off shore ask me "is this a square bet or a sharp bet" they just take my money and place the bet. They also never ask me to explain my reason for picking team or offer analysis with all kinds of trends and stats--they simply take my money and place the bet. I look at alot of information and trends before i make a bet-but to be honest most times i decide on what the current match ups are, what kind of talent do they have vs. Their opp, and do they play hard. And one of my golden rules--never put good money on a bad team--there are too many good teams that will play hard for you--those are the ones you put your money on.

SexyMit · 09-29-09, 12:46 AM

Originally posted by khaden

THIS IS WHAT I POSTED IN ANOTHER THREAD BEFORE THE GAME STARTED:
[COLOR=#000000 ! important][/color]
[COLOR=#000000 ! important]Delhome had to have a good game to start the year against philly and he was worse than he was in the playoffs, he then had to have a good game and win against atlanta and they didn't, if they had any option in a backup qb he would be benched-they have no choice but to play him. [/color]
[COLOR=#000000 ! important][/color]
[COLOR=#000000 ! important]Romo had a bad game last week against the giants who you could argue might be in the super bowl this year and dallas still almost won the game. They scored what like 21 or 24 pts of off turn overs--not to mention every stupid bounce of the ball went against dallas. Plus the cowboys shut down the giants rushing who is one of the best rushing teams in the nfl--. Which brings us back to they should be able to shut down the panthers run game and make delhome try to win the game--which he can't. [/color]
[COLOR=#000000 ! important][/color]
[COLOR=#000000 ! important]I think romo will be playing with chip on his shoulder tonight as opposed to delhome playing with zero confidence and looking not to make any mistakes. There is a big difference in those two mentaliites. As much as this game is tough to call i keep coming back to dallas winning big.[/color]

AS YOU CAN SEE CAROLINA COULD NOT RUN THE BALL AND HAD TO RELY ON DELHOMME--WHICH MEANT HE THREW 2 PICKS ONE FOR A TD, AND A FUMBLE. PLUS HE WAS MISSING OPEN RECEIVERS.

DALLAS RAN THE BALL DOWN THEIR THROATS AND ACTUALLY LEFT 11 PTS OFF THE BOARD-ONE MISSED FIELD GOAL, AND BEING ON THE ONE YD LINE TWICE AND MAKING TERRIBLE PLAY CALLS. IN REALITY THE SCORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN 31-7.

AS FAR AS BEING A SQUARE--A SHIT LOAD OF "SHARPS" WERE ON CAROLINA AND LOST. HOW THAT OLD SONG GOES "I GUESS IT'S HIP TO BE SQUARE"

Well someone gave you the wrong info, cause according to the mole we have out there in Vegas the Sharps were on Dallas and so was I. The Public was all over Carolina.

khaden · 09-29-09, 12:58 AM

Maybe i did get the wrong info as far as where the sharp money went--but they more i learn about these "sharps" they don't seem to win anymore than most people on here. In fact alot of people on here are better than the so called professionals.

danrman · 09-29-09, 01:02 AM

talk is cheap... cowboys win

og4667 · 09-29-09, 11:47 AM

sometimes the square play is the right play. Besides I thought the public was on Carolina, wouldn't that be a square play???

yisman · 09-29-09, 11:53 AM

If the court jester calls you a square, it's a good thing.

daggerkobe · 09-29-09, 12:05 PM

I'm glad the mall cop banned me over the weekend because I was loving the Panthers also. But not on the ML.

G's pks · 09-29-09, 12:06 PM

winning is all that matters...this guy ran two losing baseball threads....maybe he is the biggest square!

BadNina · 09-29-09, 12:17 PM

Eggnog sure is quiet in this thread.

jayc88 · 09-29-09, 12:19 PM

Originally posted by khaden

Maybe i did get the wrong info as far as where the sharp money went--but they more i learn about these "sharps" they don't seem to win anymore than most people on here. In fact alot of people on here are better than the so called professionals.

sharps still lose almost 50 % of their bets