If you produce nothing for your fans for 9 out of every 10 years why would the NFL keep your franchise? It is a privilege to have an NFL team and chronic underachievers should be kicked out by the league.
-
-
U need losers to have winnersComment -
Raiders were good at one time this decade, They have a good team now...just a horrible Qb
Chiefs were a powerhouse early this decade as wellComment -
So you do agree that Browns and Lions don't deserve a team.Comment -
Couldn't say it any better than thisOriginally posted by paco
Some owners need to give it up. It's a HUGE business, but they have to put some sort of competitive product on the field
That being said, for every win there is a loss. And some are better at losing than others.Comment -
great point...Originally posted by pacoComment -
less teams means less games..... which means less action for the gamblersComment -
I wish in US sports, the bottom teams got relegated to lower divisions.Comment -
Define "Browns and Lions"Originally posted by pavyracer
City? Ownership? Do you think they should move to other locations or fold?Comment -
Fold or merge and give Los Angeles a team.Originally posted by MadukweComment -
KC & Cleveland fans are the bestComment -
wait for another week for the KC Cheifs....Go w/ KC next week big...
NYG have been on the road, 3 consecutive weeksComment -
Los Angeles has already had two chances, with the LA Rams and LA Raiders.
Moving the team will not solve problems if the ownership is still the same, the fans do not make the team competitive. Players and coaches win gamesComment -
the maximum it should take a year it "rebuild" is 4 years. If your team still isnt good after then, you need some serious changes.Comment -
Originally posted by pavyracer
We need a team out here that has a chance. If you bring a perennial loser to Los Angeles, it will not supported. I am waiting for the Jaguars to leave Jacksonville and come to Southern California.Comment
