ANOTHER "FREE" POINTS QUIZ..caus' the GAMBLING GODS favored ABE once more !

TWEETS · 09-22-09, 02:27 PM

Somehow the evolution of the universe got screwed up and he ended up without one, and black men evolved theirs from his.

ABEHONEST · 09-22-09, 02:30 PM

Originally posted by TWEETS

Somehow the evolution of the universe got screwed up and he ended up without one, and black men evolved theirs from his.

TWEETS you are the early favorite !
Great answer...I smell,or sense, humor there !

TWEETS · 09-22-09, 02:32 PM

Been in a meeting for 6 hours with no break or lunch, and SBR is the only thing keeping me going.

SamsNCharge99 · 09-22-09, 02:36 PM

King Kong was a chick

shhhhh22 · 09-22-09, 02:36 PM

It was edited out of the movie... but the Chopper cut it off to get him off the damn building

Deuce · 09-22-09, 02:36 PM

Because it is not neccessary and would change the ratings if so. Would have been a distraction and the director did not want unneeded attention.

Fishhead · 09-22-09, 02:37 PM

Very simple, they did not want the movie to have an "R" or "XXX" rating.

Thanks in advance for the points.

FH

VegasDave · 09-22-09, 02:37 PM

He didn't have a Peter because he wasn't gay, silly. He had an Ann.

illmatick · 09-22-09, 02:41 PM

cumtwat!

G's pks · 09-22-09, 02:43 PM

Because if it was anatomically correct...just over a foot in length, the director felt it would have been a distraction dangling in public view.

Regul8er · 09-22-09, 02:43 PM

They would have had no choice but to call him KING DONG........just didn't seem appropriate.

Immortality · 09-22-09, 02:44 PM

He did have a Peter. Peter Jackson directed the movie King Kong in 2005.

yisman · 09-22-09, 02:45 PM

it would've been a hard sell with the chick if she had to deal with that thing.

charitableman · 09-22-09, 02:46 PM

King Kong version1 which was made in the 1930's was probably heavily influenced by the prevailing racist ideas of the time.
The recent Kong,(2005 edition)version 2, tries to stay true to the original and thus contiues the visual reflection of racist ideas that were put forth through the 30's Kong/Kong version 1. Hitler favorite movie was King Kong.

The reason he had no penis is because its an attempt to portray blacks as bestial savages but without an actual penis.
Even when King Kong was standing erect we could not see his penis yet blacks are portrayed as rapists of young blonde virgin white women. Even when the blonde was between his legs we could not see his penis.
King Kong lives in an island inhabited by dark skinned primitive people. Subsequently the creature becomes attached to a blonde woman, gets captured, transported overseas in chains, exhibited to the public as a curiosity, and is ultimately killed by members of the woman's society.

So basically in the 1930's they reflected of racist attitudes and propaganda prevalent at the time of the making of the original

yisman · 09-22-09, 03:08 PM

^ wow.

G's pks · 09-22-09, 03:43 PM

Originally posted by yisman

^ wow.

that was just copied and pasted! Read the same thing...

My answer is the best give me the points or make me a runner up and give me 25...

ABEHONEST · 09-22-09, 03:54 PM

Originally posted by G's pks

Because if it was anatomically correct...just over a foot in length, the director felt it would have been a distraction dangling in public view.

Almost a good answer there G's pks,however a foot would have to be a "bit" shy to be accurate for his gigantic height !

poker_dummy101 · 09-22-09, 04:00 PM

King Kong doesn't have a peter because the film is American. If he had to pee or let out his "manhood" it would in effect be a tsunami that killed most of the Eastern United States and tsunamis don't happen in NY. Wouldve made the movie too unrealistic imo.

If you notice, he also doesnt have an asshole either because this might cause another "natural disaster" such as "gassing the public", or "raining cats and dogs" if thats what he chose to eat prior to this event.

Regul8er · 09-22-09, 04:12 PM

King dong

sickler · 09-22-09, 04:14 PM

Censorship.

Nowadays it would be okay. Dr Manhattan's shlong would've been covered back then.

Gemoka · 09-22-09, 04:16 PM

His wife cut it off after she found out he was screwing a 4 foot midget from UAB

GiveMeaBJ · 09-22-09, 04:17 PM

King Kong did have a penis. It is the average human size of 7". If you pause the movie at times and zoom in you can see it. But for a monkey of his size it is extremley hard to see. I don't think his chick was pleased.

ABEHONEST · 09-22-09, 09:29 PM

Just got back after a huge break....I am going to pick the winner shortly !

Does anyone else want to take a shot at the 50 points ?

G's pks · 09-22-09, 09:32 PM

Originally posted by ABEHONEST

Just got back after a huge break....I am going to pick the winner shortly !

Does anyone else want to take a shot at the 50 points ?

I think I won..

G's pks · 09-22-09, 09:33 PM

my answer easily made the most sense do the right thing...

GiveMeaBJ · 09-22-09, 09:35 PM

I win.

lolbear · 09-22-09, 09:38 PM

Dawg he's too hairy

ABEHONEST · 09-22-09, 11:25 PM

And the Winner[S] are TWEETS n POKER-101 !

The two best clever and witty answers ! [could not choose just one between them]

25 points each

As for SICKLER,he comes in last place,but I will give him one point !
That's because I have never heard of Dr, Manhattan !

Now let me give my version of why they would not show his penis .

If the movie producers exposed KING KONG'S shlong[as SICKLER suggests],women and gays would have stampeded to the theaters,therefore, every time he exposed that humongous humdinger,all the women and gays would launch a chorus of ..OOOOHS and AHHHS,all in unison, and the deafening noise it created, would burst every ear-drum inside a city block ,bringing ton's of law-suits against the movie and theater owners !

G's pks · 09-22-09, 11:27 PM

wow...it was fixed...and your answer was a waste of time!

rm18 · 09-22-09, 11:30 PM

Gorillas dicks are like 1.5 inches and they are hairy so you cannot see them.

InThisMoment · 09-22-09, 11:32 PM

Gorillas have the smallest penis of primates. It is only an inch and a half when erect on average. With King Kong being larger than the average gorilla e would have a slightly larger penis. However, it would still be proportionally very small. Perhaps King Kong just wishes he was hung like a human.

ABEHONEST · 09-22-09, 11:48 PM

Originally posted by InThisMoment

Gorillas have the smallest penis of primates. It is only an inch and a half when erect on average. With King Kong being larger than the average gorilla e would have a slightly larger penis. However, it would still be proportionally very small. Perhaps King Kong just wishes he was hung like a human.

You two fellows sure know your Gorilla dicks...hmmmmmmmm ?

Now if KING KONG can hold Fay Raye in the cup of his hand ,then he must be 2 or 3 stories tall,right ?
Sooo ,a 1.5inches for a 5Ft. 5 inch Gorilla, x a 30 foot Gorilla...equals a 3ft. cannon ?

rm18 · 09-22-09, 11:54 PM

no that equals 8 inches much less soft, invisible

3 feet =10% 1.5 inches is about 2% of 5.5

Does not matter how tall the gorilla is though you cannot see their dick because the hair will be longer even if it is hard.

InTheHole · 09-22-09, 11:57 PM

So JJ is a gorilla....is that the point of this thread