Consensus is 60/40 Colts to cover ATS.
Consensus is 51/49 Colts straight up. (numbers from sbrodds).
Help me understand the thinking here. More people think the Colts can cover than win straight up? or is that ML bettors like to bet the underdog for the bigger score?
How do people make sense of this contradiction?
Consensus is 51/49 Colts straight up. (numbers from sbrodds).
Help me understand the thinking here. More people think the Colts can cover than win straight up? or is that ML bettors like to bet the underdog for the bigger score?
How do people make sense of this contradiction?