Will PFF give you a refund?
Indianapolis Colts +8
Collapse
X
-
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#456Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#457Is this the guy that's played 15 games in the last 3 years ?Originally posted by raiders72001August 5, 2023 https://touchdownwire.usatoday.com/l...laremy-tunsil/Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#458"Entrenched blindside blocker"
How is he entrenched? On the bench?Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#459I think a LT that can the whole year allowing 1 sack and 0 hits is pretty good.Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#460HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHA. That's why you're not very bright. Sacks aren't a very good indicator of future performance or even present performance for that matter. All stuff that's way wayyy over your head thoughOriginally posted by raiders72001I think a LT that can the whole year allowing 1 sack and 0 hits is pretty good.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#461How many more guys on the current practice squad are better than the starters?Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#462One day I'll teach you about thatOriginally posted by asiagamblerHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHA. That's why you're not very bright. Sacks aren't a very good indicator of future performance or even present performance for that matter. All stuff that's way wayyy over your head thoughComment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#463get a refund.Originally posted by asiagamblerHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHA. That's why you're not very bright. Sacks aren't a very good indicator of future performance or even present performance for that matter. All stuff that's way wayyy over your head thoughComment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#464Arthur Maulet > Ardarius WashingtonOriginally posted by raiders72001How many more guys on the current practice squad are better than the starters?Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#465Washington started one game in his whole career. Get a refund.Originally posted by asiagamblerArthur Maulet > Ardarius WashingtonComment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#466I'm just going by you. You counted him as a starter (how else would there be 10 starters out?)Originally posted by raiders72001Washington started one game in his whole career. Get a refund.Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#467How did practice squad player Maulet do today ?Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#468Wrong but I'm not going back to the pattern where I have to correct everything you say.Originally posted by asiagamblerI'm just going by you. You counted him as a starter (how else would there be 10 starters out?)
What's so good about this 30 year old practice squad player?Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#469The only reason you didn't explicitly count him is because you were clueless as usual. He was definitely the ? nickelback in your original reply though. So he was one you counted as part of the 10 playersOriginally posted by raiders72001Wrong but I'm not going back to the pattern where I have to correct everything you say.
What's so good about this 30 year old practice squad player?Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#4704 tackles including 1 TFL, tipped pass that led to INTOriginally posted by raiders72001Wrong but I'm not going back to the pattern where I have to correct everything you say.
What's so good about this 30 year old practice squad player?
Plenty of starting experience with Pitt but we count him as a practice squad player anywayComment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#471You like picking on Mekari, how did the other 14 practice squad players do ?
Players like MauletComment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#472I'd throw out everything that happened in today's game. I'm guessing there will be a new backup QB game 6.Originally posted by asiagambler4 tackles including 1 TFL, tipped pass that led to INT
Plenty of starting experience with Pitt but we count him as a practice squad player anywayComment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#473Why? Does the QB run the ball 30 times a game too ?Originally posted by raiders72001I'd throw out everything that happened in today's game. I'm guessing there will be a new backup QB game 6.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#474The feel good stories are nice, but next you'll be telling me that Maulet's more important to the Ravens than Roquan Smith.
You don't see the same game the rest of us see. It's obvious that the loss of Watson was the cause of the loss of the game. No team can win with that QB in the game. You come up with strange theories to fit your agenda.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#475duplicateComment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#476https://apnews.com/article/deshaun-w...0couldn't%20go.He barely threw during practice this week, and the Browns listed him as questionable while holding out hope he’d be able to play.But after a 10-minute pregame workout watched closely by head trainer Joe Sheehan, coach Kevin Stefanski and general manager Andrew Berry, Watson informed the Browns he couldn’t go.
“He pushed himself. He tried,” said Stefanski. “He did everything in his power to get ready, but just did not feel comfortable earlier this morning and didn’t feel like we could put him out there. He knows his body. I trust him.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#477This is what most of us sawThe 23-year-old, who made 48 starts in college, rarely appeared confident and his stat line — 19 of 36 for 121 yards — didn’t fully capture his struggles. Thompson-Robinson threw several passes that were nearly picked off, and the three the Ravens grabbed were balls he forced into tight coverage.
Watson wouldn't talk after the gameStefanski said there was no structural damage in Watson's shoulder. The CBS broadcast mentioned "fluid" on the shoulder, but he wouldn't confirm or deny that report.
"Specifics, I don't know," Stefanski said. "But structurally he's OK."Comment -
asiagamblerSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-23-17
- 6827
#478Maulet was just an example of a player that filled in and played at the level of or better than the starter he was replacing. And this was easily predictable if you looked beyond just "practice squad player called up to replace starter"Originally posted by raiders72001The feel good stories are nice, but next you'll be telling me that Maulet's more important to the Ravens than Roquan Smith.
You don't see the same game the rest of us see. It's obvious that the loss of Watson was the cause of the loss of the game. No team can win with that QB in the game. You come up with strange theories to fit your agenda.
Roquan Smith has nothing to do with anything except that IF he was ruled out, that WOULD be an injury that mattered MUCH MORE than the ones that didn't. He wasn't so you're just arguing about nothing here
Cleveland didn't lose because of Watson or no Watson. Baltimore was BY FAR the superior team that day. Their defense was better, their running game was better, their special teams were better, their coaching was better. They were the better team all around. You have to give credit to their defense for MAKING DTR look that bad. Watson wasn't changing that result
I'm ready to end this feud
You made some bets. You will make some more betsComment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#479The only reason for the loss was the QB. Cleveland forced Balt to punt first series. Cleveland got the ball threw an interception that led to 7 and the game was over. QB threw 3 picks, averaged 3.4 yds/pass with a QB rating of 25.3. Cleveland can't score a TD in 4 games with that QB.Originally posted by asiagamblerMaulet was just an example of a player that filled in and played at the level of or better than the starter he was replacing. And this was easily predictable if you looked beyond just "practice squad player called up to replace starter"
Roquan Smith has nothing to do with anything except that IF he was ruled out, that WOULD be an injury that mattered MUCH MORE than the ones that didn't. He wasn't so you're just arguing about nothing here
Cleveland didn't lose because of Watson or no Watson. Baltimore was BY FAR the superior team that day. Their defense was better, their running game was better, their special teams were better, their coaching was better. They were the better team all around. You have to give credit to their defense for MAKING DTR look that bad. Watson wasn't changing that result
I'm ready to end this feud
You made some bets. You will make some more betsComment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11247
#480Holding my nose today and taking the Giants. They must give Jones time and I'm definitely worried about that.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
