They filed a full appeal before the entire 3rd circuit.
Delaware's argument is a simple one.
They are contending that Nevada is offering 1300 different wagers they did not have available in 1992, why shouldn't they be offered the same consideration under the Federal Act as Nevada.
It is simple, it makes sense....and I have no idea how the circuit will be able to defend one state having a different set of rules than another.
Delaware's argument is a simple one.
They are contending that Nevada is offering 1300 different wagers they did not have available in 1992, why shouldn't they be offered the same consideration under the Federal Act as Nevada.
It is simple, it makes sense....and I have no idea how the circuit will be able to defend one state having a different set of rules than another.
