sbrodds.com or sportsinsight?

jjgold · 08-21-09, 12:48 PM

Sports Insights might have better percentages

Sports Insights does cost $70 a month

SBR is free

As far as quickness and accuracy of line changes there is very little

RogueScholar · 08-21-09, 01:06 PM

Sports Insights data is far and away more accurate and reliable. They pay for feeds from the sportsbooks (hence why they charge for the service) and their consensus numbers reflect all the books in their feed (also each individual book's data can be viewed), whereas SBROdds only displays data from 5Dimes (a book that caters specifically to losing players). You get what you pay for, and SBROdds is nothing more than a convenience for small recreational gamblers that aren't concerned about turning a profit. If you're not one of those, then you need better information than they provide with which to make decisions.

nosniboR11 · 08-21-09, 04:30 PM

good post rogue

jjgold · 08-21-09, 04:51 PM

Rogue good post but I think your under estimating sbrlines

good luck Ace

RichardMoss · 08-21-09, 07:35 PM

If I will have the insight of the competition platforms I will be more than glad to give details of functionality. Ours is a very robust platform and highly complicated to follow, but for handling such amount of data it is very stable and reliable. Still a lot work to do. If this wouldn't be the case Big Stick Media wouldn't be one of our clients.

rake922 · 08-21-09, 08:37 PM

Originally posted by bilsonx_nc

Which one is more accurate on the percentages of bets on each side sbrodds.com or sports insight? They have opposite data, for example, sbrodds.com is showing that Atlanta today had 39% bets but then sportsinsight is showing they have 73% bets.

That's why I don't beleive either one

jjgold · 08-21-09, 10:02 PM

SBR only has I beleive one consensus book

Sports Insights has like 6

RogueScholar · 08-21-09, 10:07 PM

Originally posted by RichardMoss

If I will have the insight of the competition platforms I will be more than glad to give details of functionality. Ours is a very robust platform and highly complicated to follow, but for handling such amount of data it is very stable and reliable. Still a lot work to do. If this wouldn't be the case Big Stick Media wouldn't be one of our clients.

English, please? I was unable to recognize a single point you were making. If Big Stick Media is such a big deal for you guys why isn't that shit made a bigger deal out of? Sounds like you are trying to write SBR propaganda in Hungarian and then translate it to English using Google.

Intuitive_Edge · 08-21-09, 10:10 PM

Originally posted by RogueScholar

Sports Insights data is far and away more accurate and reliable. They pay for feeds from the sportsbooks (hence why they charge for the service) and their consensus numbers reflect all the books in their feed (also each individual book's data can be viewed), whereas SBROdds only displays data from 5Dimes (a book that caters specifically to losing players). You get what you pay for, and SBROdds is nothing more than a convenience for small recreational gamblers that aren't concerned about turning a profit. If you're not one of those, then you need better information than they provide with which to make decisions.

So anybody who uses 5D is a loser ?

RogueScholar · 08-21-09, 10:14 PM

Originally posted by Intuitive_Edge

So anybody who uses 5D is a loser ?

Not at all. I've played at 5Dimes for almost three years and I've gotten about half a dozen payouts for them. I'm just saying that they've got a well-earned reputation for limiting winning players and then eventually showing them the door. As I've become more profitable I'm very careful to only make wagers there that I can get comparable value at elsewhere so as preserve my account with them. Certainly winners play at 50Pennies, but not nearly as long as at books that cater to professional players.