In all my life, i have never seen anything like this..................

durito · 08-17-09, 09:52 PM

it happens

Intuitive_Edge · 08-17-09, 09:54 PM

I noticed them overs a while ago. Talk about offensive firepower

Shortstop · 08-17-09, 09:56 PM

They sure can put runs up. An offensive machine.

SBR_John · 08-17-09, 09:57 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

i have not see a team in any sport dominate in making money and over the total like the 2009 Anaheim Angels.. unreal... it just doesn't stop..

Every game for the last month, with the exception of a few days, it has been Anaheim, and Anaheim over.. if you have been betting ANA and ANA over for the last month, you'd be living the life

and now the best part.. if you have been betting ANA and ANA over all year, you'd be up close to 55 units.. so if you bet 1k on each (no parlay, just side bets), you'd be up 55,000..

you'd have made 55x your investment on just 1 team...

i have never seen anything like it in my long gambling career.

The big question is... will it continue??

When is it too late for a trend player? Do you risk 10 units here?

Iceman · 08-17-09, 10:28 PM

The funny thing is how it all kind of came out of nowhere also.

They got hit hard with injuires ealier in the year and it seemed like they may be done but instead they turned it up offensively since then and have never turned stopped.

The thing is they have now become the Rangers and the Rangers have become the Angels.

It's like they are NEVER out of a game. Seems like they get behind early all the time only to come flying back and then blow people out.

They are fun to bet and it seems because they have such shaky staring pitching they are usually resonably priced.

Nicky Santoro · 08-17-09, 10:31 PM

here's another great stat about Anaheim..

they have had 6 straight seasons where they made money each year.. they have not had a losing gambling year since 2003.. and up close to 75 units in those 6 yrs.

I guess anaheim was the team to bet for the last 6 yrs..

Ever since Vladimir Guerrero went there, that's when they never lost again..

what do you expect from a former expo...my team..

StraitShooter · 08-17-09, 10:31 PM

I thought this thread was going to be about the ending in the Giants game

Iceman · 08-17-09, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by Nicky Santoro

here's another great stat about Anaheim..

they have had 6 straight seasons where they made money each year.. they have not had a losing gambling year since 2003.. and up close to 75 units in those 6 yrs.

I guess anaheim was the team to bet for the last 6 yrs..

Ever since Vladimir Guerrero went there, that's when they never lost again..

what do you expect from a former expo...my team..

I think they could be dominite if some of their proven starters can get their act together. This may be their best shot with that offense. It's a totally different Angels team then the ones in the past. Their scary because they are NEVER out of game.

BeatTheJerk · 08-17-09, 10:54 PM

Nicky how do you get +55 units from 67-42 ? on a one unit scale ...................

durito · 08-17-09, 10:56 PM

you need the odds on every game.

what if one game was +23,300

Nicky Santoro · 08-17-09, 10:58 PM

Originally posted by BeatTheJerk

Nicky how do you get +55 units from 67-42 ? on a one unit scale ...................

+55 is based on ANA and ANA over.. 2 bets.

durito, are you drunk, or are you just dumb as usual..

they are up about 25 units money wise.. $$$$$..

try to make some sense when you talk... for once..

durito · 08-17-09, 11:01 PM

I am in fact drunk. But, I make perfect sense.

Your stats are surley based on their odds each game. So, where am I not makin sense. Obviously no mlb game is +23,300. But, he asked how one could be +55 at 67-42. well, as you should know, there's about a million ways one could come to that depending on the odds on each game

FreeFall · 08-17-09, 11:04 PM

Nicky's numbers are never right. Why do you guys even bother asking.

Nicky Santoro · 08-17-09, 11:05 PM

sides are already established in $$.. so it's irrelevant.. totals that are 67-42 will always come within 1 or 2 games of the record cause every total is between even, +110 or -120.. never more.. over 110 games, it will even out to zero..
so if they're not +25 units, then they'll be +23.7 units.. it won't be at +11 units..

Nicky Santoro · 08-17-09, 11:06 PM

Originally posted by FreeFall

Nicky's numbers are never right. Why do you guys even bother asking.

my #'s are always right.. i do this for a living.. find me 1 time i was wrong with my #'s.. dont waste your time cause you won't find anything..

durito · 08-17-09, 11:07 PM

lol

BeatTheJerk · 08-17-09, 11:08 PM

I understand now. I guess I didn't read the 2 bet configure for the units .......................