Texans at Chiefs - Pick and Write-Up

[mjsuax13]

I'm just curious why you bet it over 54.5 and not bet the original line.

Don’t ask me questions Kermit! Dumb shit coward.

[mjsuax13]

What’s the results in this place?

59-60 guy

[thomorino]

Started the thread with an excuse in the first sentence..
Has no idea what variance is..

This game was the definition of negative variance you dumb shit. You redefine the word dumb.

[thomorino]

59-60 guy

You devote half your life to posting in my threads.

[thomorino]

59-60 guy

You are a parasite.

[mjsuax13]

You devote half your life to posting in my threads.

Signed, your #1 fan.

[Enkhbat]

Tough way to lose the over by the hook. Seemed like everyone was on the over too.

[juicername]

Bad variance.

[gauchojake]

Shitty number

[Buckandadime]

This game was the definition of negative variance you dumb shit. You redefine the word dumb.

[Emily_Haines]

Shitty number

shitty gambler

when the total moves from 52.5 to 55 and lands 54

NO ONE SHOULD HAVE LOST!

[JayLA]

Bad variance.

I've never piled on Marino like you all do but that comment was a bit suspect.

Variance in poker is I think more plausible because the math is more at the forefront....not sure about the math in sportbetting but variance I dont think plays a factor....or one really needs to be mathing it up to know that its variance.

[JayLA]

shitty gambler

when the total moves from 52.5 to 55 and lands 54

NO ONE SHOULD HAVE LOST!

It was at 54 at most books for most of the time, thats unfair.

[mjsuax13]

I've never piled on Marino like you all do but that comment was a bit suspect.

Variance in poker is I think more plausible because the math is more at the forefront....not sure about the math in sportbetting but variance I dont think plays a factor....or one really needs to be mathing it up to know that its variance.

Don’t worry. He’s about to come after you for this comment you parasite!

[gauchojake]

It was at 54 at most books for most of the time, thats unfair.

Marino states that he is a pro gambler.

[Emily_Haines]

Bad variance.

No.

bad gambler

[lakerboy]

It was at 54 at most books for most of the time, thats unfair.

It was at 52/53 at betonline today. That's a book that moron plays at. I advised the dummy to put more on the over at 53. He thought he was smart betting it at 54.5.

[thomorino]

Shitty number

[quote=Emily_Haines;29697272]
No.

bad gambler[


2 dumb shits

[KnuckleHeadz]

It was at 54 at most books for most of the time, thats unfair.

He was in traffic court when the good lines were out

[Emily_Haines]

It was at 52/53 at betonline today. That's a book that moron plays at. I advised the dummy to put more on the over at 53. He thought he was smart betting it at 54.5.

A lot of places had 54 when he bet. Of course Mr. Genius doesn’t use multiple books and has to bet the 54.5.

Guys like this are why books give away free money and beg you to play there.

[keely85]

I missed weeders threads at least his losses are a fun social event. This is just sad.

[mjsuax13]

Seaweed won tonight!

[juicername]

I've never piled on Marino like you all do but that comment was a bit suspect.

Variance in poker is I think more plausible because the math is more at the forefront....not sure about the math in sportbetting but variance I dont think plays a factor....or one really needs to be mathing it up to know that its variance.

Yeah in poker you can literally calculate the EV for every single hand that goes to showdown.

Morino sees every single loss of his as bad variance, but every lucky bounce he gets to get a lucky win he attributes to his great skill as a caper.

[thomorino]

He was in traffic court when the good lines were out

A lot of places had 54 when he bet. Of course Mr. Genius doesn’t use multiple books and has to bet the 54.5.

Guys like this are why books give away free money and beg you to play there.

I missed weeders threads at least his losses are a fun social event. This is just sad.

Yeah in poker you can literally calculate the EV for every single hand that goes to showdown.

Morino sees every single loss of his as bad variance, but every lucky bounce he gets to get a lucky win he attributes to his great skill as a caper.

Parasites.

[mjsuax13]

0-1 dipshit. How many units did you lose? Let’s keep track.

[juicername]

I missed weeders threads at least his losses are a fun social event. This is just sad.

We finally got the answer to who the bigger mush of the two is.

Seaweed found someone he's a better caper than, unrael!

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3618317-nfl-week-1-kc-vs-houston-under-54-5-total.html

[thomorino]

0-1 dipshit. How many units did you lose? Let’s keep track.

We finally got the answer to who the bigger mush of the two is.

Seaweed found someone he's a better caper than, unrael!
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...4-5-total.html

2 dumb shit cowards

[mjsuax13]

2 dumb shit cowards

Go to bed.

[Hman]

Tough hit

Get it back today

[stake1]

shitty gambler

when the total moves from 52.5 to 55 and lands 54

NO ONE SHOULD HAVE LOST!

Only morono

[thomorino]

Go to bed.

Only morono

2 parasites.

[mjsuax13]

This game was the definition of negative variance you dumb shit. You redefine the word dumb.

Thanks Will Hunting.

[JayLA]

Tried to help your dumbass but you stuck with a loss.

this was good advice by laker to hit over 53 once line got bet down

[JayLA]

Take under 42 in new England game. DUMMY

hmmm you think so lake or just saying? I was thinking of taking Miami spread but im a homer

[thomorino]

Thanks Will Hunting.

You are a dumb shit.