NBA V2.0 System Update
In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series.
The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible.
Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play.
Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play:
On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play.
You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point.
Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference.
MLB V3.0 System UPDATE:
The update here is designed to allow you even more betting opportunities during the course of the baseball season by taking advantage of the unofficial plays that fall outside of the acceptable level of RPI difference between the two teams.
The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of theirrematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [B] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, In some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [B] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager.
Remember, the same betting rules apply: Always bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win. Always bet on the run line (+1.5 runs) if the team you’re betting on is the underdog. You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the run line in the bet lineup. A team showing a +1.5 in the run line means they are the underdog. A team showing a -1.5 in the run line means they are the favorite.
Here’s an example of the v3.0 system in action:
During the 2008 MLB baseball season, the Boston Red Sox played the Kansas City Royals from May 19th to May 22nd and swept them in the entire series.
On August 4th, Boston played Kansas City again in a 3-game series. At this time during the season, Boston's RPI was at least .025 higher than Kansas City, making the series fall outside of the original v1.0 system's betting criteria for Kansas City. However, Kansas City ended up winning the first game of the series on August 4th.
Since Boston was the team that swept Kansas City previously, and their RPI is at least .025 higher than Kansas City, the fact that Kansas City came back and won the first game vs. Boston make the series eligible for play under the v3.0 MLB system.
Therefore, on August 5th, you would put down an [A] bet for Boston to beat Kansas City. Boston ended up winning the game. At this point you've won the betting series, and there's no need to make any more wagers for either team.
IF Boston had lost to Kansas City again on August 5th, then you would need to place a [B] bet for Boston again on August 6th when they play Kansas City in the final game.
There are no possible [C] bets in this series.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope you guys enjoy this even though hes a scammer but his system has a decent track record
In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series.
The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible.
Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play.
Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play:
On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play.
You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point.
Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference.
MLB V3.0 System UPDATE:
The update here is designed to allow you even more betting opportunities during the course of the baseball season by taking advantage of the unofficial plays that fall outside of the acceptable level of RPI difference between the two teams.
The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of theirrematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [B] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, In some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [B] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager.
Remember, the same betting rules apply: Always bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win. Always bet on the run line (+1.5 runs) if the team you’re betting on is the underdog. You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the run line in the bet lineup. A team showing a +1.5 in the run line means they are the underdog. A team showing a -1.5 in the run line means they are the favorite.
Here’s an example of the v3.0 system in action:
During the 2008 MLB baseball season, the Boston Red Sox played the Kansas City Royals from May 19th to May 22nd and swept them in the entire series.
On August 4th, Boston played Kansas City again in a 3-game series. At this time during the season, Boston's RPI was at least .025 higher than Kansas City, making the series fall outside of the original v1.0 system's betting criteria for Kansas City. However, Kansas City ended up winning the first game of the series on August 4th.
Since Boston was the team that swept Kansas City previously, and their RPI is at least .025 higher than Kansas City, the fact that Kansas City came back and won the first game vs. Boston make the series eligible for play under the v3.0 MLB system.
Therefore, on August 5th, you would put down an [A] bet for Boston to beat Kansas City. Boston ended up winning the game. At this point you've won the betting series, and there's no need to make any more wagers for either team.
IF Boston had lost to Kansas City again on August 5th, then you would need to place a [B] bet for Boston again on August 6th when they play Kansas City in the final game.
There are no possible [C] bets in this series.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope you guys enjoy this even though hes a scammer but his system has a decent track record