I waited a day before I posted this just because I wanted to see how many asinine threads would be started about how the Red Sox Championships are now tainted. My answer is they are simply not tarnished in ANY way. Here is how. Any baseball fan will tell you that if they released that full list today, there would be a smattering of players from EVERY team on it. To say the Red Sox (or Yankees for that matter) are any more guilty than lets say the Cardinals or the Cubs from that era is absurd. You cannot put an asterik on the championships won in the mid 90's to the mid 2000's. There was a level playing field. A field that was awash in steroid use, but a level one at that. Now if anyone says that the Red Sox 2 best hitters were on roids, and that makes all the difference, all I need to say is DUH!! Of course the BEST ballplayers at that time were on roids! Once again, would any of you be surprised if you found out the best ballplayer from the era on your favorite team was on roids? I doubt it. When the Yankees players were found to be on the juice, I found it funny, but NEVER said they should put an asterik next to their championships or ever thought that their wins were tainted. When EVERYONE is doing it, it makes EVERYTHING equal. The next Yahoo that says otherwise will be eligible for POTM (Putz Of The Month).
They gave us soooooo much shit about Bonds