-
Comment -
Vegas, you are the ONLY one with any sense on here!!! It is obvious she was violated and all you morons that say it was staged are trying to ratinalize the reasoning why you can watch a rape happen on camera. Erin Andrews was VIOLATED!!!!! You guys are all sick.Originally posted by VegasDaveComment -
Originally posted by CasperwaitsQuote:
Originally Posted by VegasDave
Ugh, it's bad enough that the girl's privacy was blatantly violated, now she has to deal with this shit too.
Keep telling yourself it was staged so you feel less guilty "using" the footage.
Sad. Just sad.
Vegas, you are the ONLY one with any sense on here!!! It is obvious she was violated and all you morons that say it was staged are trying to ratinalize the reasoning why you can watch a rape happen on camera. Erin Andrews was VIOLATED!!!!! You guys are all sick.
While I agree that its messed up that someone did that and then put it online, calling it "rape" makes you look like an idiot. All you're doing is damaging your argument because nobodys going to take what you say seriously.Originally posted by Dark HorseComment -
video is fake.. wasn't her.. it was a girl that looks exactly like her. there are about 200,000 typical american girls that look EXACTLY like her..Comment -
I think every guy in world wants to fiuk her now, she wanted the attention and that os what is real sad.Comment -
Suspect #1
Comment -
If you did about 10 seconds of research into this you'd know that she has admitted its her and her lawyers as well as ESPN are involved in the situation.Originally posted by Nicky SantoroOriginally posted by Dark HorseComment -
well doctor, i guess i was wrong.. i didn't even research it.. my bad..Originally posted by DrStaleComment -
It is rape in the mental sense. The fact is, she was violated in a camera sense. Granted, she wasn't physically traumatized, but the camera and the man that taped it raped her mentally. Calling me a moron is elementary and narrow minded.Originally posted by DrStaleQuote:
Originally Posted by Casperwaits
Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasDave
Ugh, it's bad enough that the girl's privacy was blatantly violated, now she has to deal with this shit too.
Keep telling yourself it was staged so you feel less guilty "using" the footage.
Sad. Just sad.
Vegas, you are the ONLY one with any sense on here!!! It is obvious she was violated and all you morons that say it was staged are trying to ratinalize the reasoning why you can watch a rape happen on camera. Erin Andrews was VIOLATED!!!!! You guys are all sick.
While I agree that its messed up that someone did that and then put it online, calling it "rape" makes you look like an idiot. All you're doing is damaging your argument because nobodys going to take what you say seriously.Comment -
Originally posted by Casperwaits
SOlid
Comment -
No research before a post? That's very unlike you.Originally posted by Nicky SantoroOriginally posted by pags11Originally posted by BuddyBearOriginally posted by curiousComment -
the way that i ratianolize it is hey, i pop HUGE wood when i see it, it makes me happyOriginally posted by Casperwaits
from a youtillitarean perspective it is fine
ALSO - she is probably a slut wether it was staged or not so who cares that we are calling her a slutComment -
This thread is useless without a link...Comment -
editOriginally posted by Mac4LyfeComment -
video not working anymore. i think sbr took it downComment -
It is staged or it is not her
One of the twoComment -
F**K YOU JJ.
Comment -
If there's a celebrity nudie clip of attractive women I've yet to see starkers, I want to see it. Don't care how it was obtained. Morally corrupt for sure......but although most of us will agree using the peephole strategy on the unknowing is wrong, it was done and there she is, Erin Andrews in all her glory.
Comment -
Originally posted by jjgold
bingo, we have a winner!!Comment -
Based on what exactly?Originally posted by Fishhead
Why would ESPN take such swift legal action if it wasn't her?
And if it was "staged", why not just leak the naughty photos as if they were taken by an ex-bf or something? Why would you go this disgusting pervert method?
It makes zero sense that it is staged/fake.Comment -
No way it was staged, this is just JJ being JJ.המוסד
המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים
Comment -
I'm sorry guys but I have to disagree here. I'm with VegasDave on this one. I love women but this is not right. I just felt bad for her and her family.
Trying to conceptualize a motive for the the video is sad. You have to be really desperate or lonely to be proud of watching something like that.
Take a shower, go outside and talk to the prettiest girl you see. Work on your game, instead of over thinking about a video where it seems the woman had a complete invasion of privacy.Comment -
Although I initially thought that allegations that it was staged or not her had some validity, I just found out that the video has been on the web for 4+ months and has only recently gained exposure.
This almost certainly means it wasn't staged because if it was they would've found a way to get it publicity sooner.
And as for it not being her, the fact that ESPN and her lawyers have admitted it was her pretty much rules that out, otherwise she'd be getting herself in shit for taking legal action when she knows it's not her.Comment -
?? it has?Originally posted by dwaechte
who said this?Comment -
no way in hell that video has been available for 4+ mos and we did not know about it until now.......... absolutely no fukkin way
the damn thing was just released............... the internet and sensationalist world moves too quickly guyComment -
Anyway to make video crystal clear? I want to see more of her and clearer.
I want to see her nipples and stuff, compact dikk anyway to do this??Comment -
Mr. Gold you are freaking classic...................."i want to see her nipples and stuff............." LMAOComment -
Video has been online for 4+ months.
Comment -
that is unreal.Comment -
From:
It appears that the videos were posted on Dailymotion.com by username “Goblazers1″ as early as February 17, 2009. I’ve tried to get a response from this user and they haven’t responded, and given the current threat of legal issues coming their way I doubt anyone will ever hear from this person.
So my gut instinct based on the username is that this person is a Portland Trailblazers fan. So the next question is has Erin ever been in the Portland, Oregon area? Yes. She was there in 2008 for the USC-Oregon State football game on September 25, 2008.
However, that is a pretty generic username. Could there be another place where someone would root for a Blazer? Try the University of Alabama-Birmingham Blazers. While Andrews probably didn’t cover a Blazers game, the ESPN College Gameday crew was in Alabama for the week 5 Tennessee-Auburn tilt and the week 14 Auburn-Alabama game. Both of these games, and their surrounding hotels, are in Blazer Country.
Sure you might think I’m going on all assumptions here, but some of the videos on Daily Motion are geotagged. Some are tagged with Atlanta, some are tagged with an obscure college outside Waco, Texas and others are geotagged, ahem, right outside of Montgomery, Alabama. [see screen shots below]
So if the Erin Andrews wrecking crew is looking for a place to start, I recommend checking the hotel records for her recent stays in the Montgomery area. Get the room number, the employee records, and so on. This case should be closed by next week.
Update: In some of the videos the source code has “Erin Andrews” in it, implying that the original files were named something along the lines of erin-andrews-view-in-original-forma_sexy.wmv. This is what was picked up by Google and one of the reasons why this video the video shows up in the Google Video search tab.Comment -
It was clearly not faked. I can tell just from watching the video. Yes, I have watched it. I happened to see the link that was first posted on SBR's Player's Talk, before the link was dead and the thread was moved to the PZ. I was also the first person to comment on the post and condemn the video's existence. HG was the first one to laugh in my face and say it was great.
While it was a criminal violation of Erin's privacy, now the damn story has grown beyond just cheesy peephole eroticism into a matter of ethics and criminal law, which to me are the juicy topics. Watching it now is like watching the security-camera videotape of a crime scene. But it also tells me that the scene was not faked or staged. One telltale sign that Erin did not know she was on camera is when she slid her hand along one of her buttocks and then immediately wiped her itchy nose with the same hand. No way a pro like her would do that if she knew she was on camera.Comment -
i agree with you nick, it looks real to meComment -
From Yahoo Sports:
"In conjunction with ESPN and her attorney, Andrews is working with authorities to catch the perpetrators of this heinous act, but the damage has been done. Her privacy has been invaded, and the video of her naked body is out there. Most Web sites have deleted the video under threat of legal action, but that can't undo the fact that it was shot and posted in the first place.
"Nor will it change what could be a ripple effect on women working on-camera in sports. Until now, most of the attention around Andrews has been harmless fun. She is attractive, friendly and knowledgeable about sports, which made her a magnet for attention. Blogs were smart enough to take advantage of that. Her nickname is "Erin Pageviews" because any mention of her is an automatic traffic boost.
"That sort of attention wouldn't keep most women from working in sports. Sexual assault -- and, make no mistake, Andrews was assaulted -- will. Voyeurism isn't "boys will be boys," or realizing that men are ogling your (clothed) picture. Voyeurism is about taking safety and security from a victim in a place they should feel comfortable."
Regardless of what the emotionally challenged and disturbed men on this forum think, what happened to Erin Andrews was just tragically wrong. I've said it before and I'll say it here: I really enjoy internet porn and have nothing against it. I even like photos of women who appear to be victimized (ever see those "sleeping girl porn" sites? Hilarious). But almost all that crap is staged. This was not. This was a violation of privacy, which I hold even more sacred than the right to beat off to whatever the hell you want to.
Aren't there any fathers here who imagine how they would feel if this was their daughter being peeped on? What if your daughter was only 15 when it happened and the video ended up on the internet? Wouldn't you want to kill the guy who put it on the net? Or would you beat off to the image of your own daughter's body being spied upon?
Erin Andrews is somebody's daughter. The perv who shot the video has no salvageable soul. The people here who crow about how great the video is have no conscience. Maybe if there were more women on this forum, there would be a little more sensitivity about right and wrong and a little less Neanderthal attitudes.Comment -
I have watched it no lie over 300 times and going to watch it again in 10 minutes
This is greatComment -
Whoa. Suddenly the board is full of moralists. I wonder why.
She should have just shrugged it off. And she definitely knows it will get much more attention if she jumps all over it.
I remember using a public toilet in a LA hotel and suddenly I saw this little hole in the partition. Then I realized that there was an eye behind that hole! Did I go for the millions? No. I just wiped my ass.
Then I got up, kicked down the door, and put the guy head first in the toilet. Why does it always have to be about the money?Comment
