I’m considering making an all-in, truly massive wager on the Padres tonight

[BIGDAY]

Unreal.

[Bostongambler]

Best of luck going forward John.

[stake1]

Massive Sunday night on the Indians. Massive Monday night All In on the -2 Padres.

Which team do you have for a massive terrific Tuesday? Please post early. Please post often.

[JAKEPEAVY21]

Tatis Jr being out loomed large...Garcia, the fill in SS, butchered a couple of plays that Tatis Jr likely would have made.

[stake1]

Please don't talk the mush Henry Hill off the Pads, I'm on Atlanta and need the help.

Congrats to us.

[Believe_EMT]

stealth is wealth boys.

my main concern wouldn't be the result of a single event

i am extremely concerned that OP watched this line move overnight with Sharps backing the Braves and Johnny boy still backed SD even though the line rose again throughout the day!!

the market is clearly telling you Atl was mispriced all the way up to 160-ish. so you went all-in against a 20+ cents line move?!?

even with an efficient closing line, you would need this same match up to play out infinite times and then you would still finish down. terrible play, not based on the actual outcome, but the decisions leading all the way up to placing the bet.

[Slipknot26]

Christ
Youve lost every "massive" play you posted .
Nicely done

[Sam Odom]

Tatis will be missed...

Tatis Jr being out loomed large...Garcia, the fill in SS, butchered a couple of plays that Tatis Jr likely would have made.

Sorry for your loss but gotta look for better spots

[pabonaparte]

This wasn't even close... John?

[pabonaparte]

stealth is wealth boys.

my main concern wouldn't be the result of a single event

i am extremely concerned that OP watched this line move overnight with Sharps backing the Braves and Johnny boy still backed SD even though the line rose again throughout the day!!

the market is clearly telling you Atl was mispriced all the way up to 160-ish. so you went all-in against a 20+ cents line move?!?

even with an efficient closing line, you would need this same match up to play out infinite times and then you would still finish down. terrible play, not based on the actual outcome, but the decisions leading all the way up to placing the bet.

You may want to rethink this strategy. Underdogs in this spot have historically been profitable. It all depends on how massive the move is and whether it is dictated by line-up changes or not.

[JamesBrown]

Padres roll tonight though. Double up and get that money back.

[2daBank]

You may want to rethink this strategy. Underdogs in this spot have historically been profitable. It all depends on how massive the move is and whether it is dictated by line-up changes or not.

Spot on..

I’m way more likely to bet against those 20 cent moves than play same side, well part of that cause I’ll never make a play after losing 20 cents or more on the line. Part of it cause those alleged “sharps” 1st off not necessarily sharp just cause they betting ebough to move line, secondly sharp or not it often creates value on the other side.,

[gojetsgomoxies]

did the line move on sharps?... or did it move on tangible info? which is completely different.

[BGS 9.5]

Hank, where are you pal?

[Bostongambler]

Where’s John tonight?

[TigerWoods3]

I got it all back on the dodgers tonight, we were hilariously only -141 with Buehler on the mound against the pitiful giants. Big $800 hit

And btw guys, I’m Tiger. I don’t know who this other guy is you keep talking about. No clue. I’m Tiger and nobody else

[TigerWoods3]

Night night time

Gonna start season 2 of Stranger Things

Have a good night sbr and god bless

[Plaza23]

I got it all back on the dodgers tonight,

It’s crazy SBR keeps finding these clowns.

Goes “all in” one day, loses. Miraculously wins it back the next day with no posted ticket

[stake1]

It’s crazy SBR keeps finding these clowns.

Goes “all in” one day, loses. Miraculously wins it back the next day with no posted ticket

Clown. That is the perfect word for the OP.

He gets destroyed on two massive posted plays on Indians and Padres. Then claims a past posted all in win. Lmao!

In addition to all that, apparently “tigger” is banned here under his original user name, and was recently banned under a different name, hence the new “tigger” persona.

OP is definitely a clown.

[TigerWoods3]

Clown. That is the perfect word for the OP.

He gets destroyed on two massive posted plays on Indians and Padres. Then claims a past posted all in win. Lmao!

In addition to all that, apparently “tigger” is banned here under his original user name, and was recently banned under a different name, hence the new “tigger” persona.

OP is definitely a clown.

What?

Not one word of this is true

You are talking utter nonsense, little boy

However, I’m still feeling great from my big Dodgers hit last night

[jjgold]

[2daBank]

I got it all back on the dodgers tonight, we were hilariously only -141 with Buehler on the mound against the pitiful giants. Big $800 hit

And btw guys, I’m Tiger. I don’t know who this other guy is you keep talking about. No clue. I’m Tiger and nobody else

Lmao. Biggest clown move a poster can pull. “No worries i got my all in play back on a game I didn’t even post about before the fact”.

Even if you not another pathetic ghost which you probably are since these guys have a incredibly high success rate calling you types out, you already making a name for yourself as a clown w this bs nobody believes or cares about.

[TigerWoods3]

Lmao. Biggest clown move a poster can pull. “No worries i got my all in play back on a game I didn’t even post about before the fact”.

Even if you not another pathetic ghost which you probably are since these guys have a incredibly high success rate calling you types out, you already making a name for yourself as a clown w this bs nobody believes or cares about.

Okie dokie

[Bostongambler]

Okie dokie

Good come back Potsie

[Believe_EMT]

You may want to rethink this strategy. Underdogs in this spot have historically been profitable. It all depends on how massive the move is and whether it is dictated by line-up changes or not.

in god we trust, all others bring data, please.

but if you aren't getting a better number than the closer, you will lose long term. so your claim here is that the closing line is not efficient?