The most prolific tennis poster in SBR history?

EaglesPhan36 · 07-11-09, 03:03 PM

You guys do realize that the word prolific has nothing to do with picking winners right? Prolific is simply putting out a great number of posts than some one else. I'm not even sure Lou wins by that definition.

Fischnasty · 07-12-09, 08:28 PM

bump

RogueScholar · 07-12-09, 08:35 PM

Wow, I can't believe I'm still winning. This is such an honor guys, you have absolutely no idea how much your love and support mean to me.

Fischnasty · 07-12-09, 08:36 PM

i was hoping that certain new information which has recently been tabulated might influence future voting

KingRevolver · 07-12-09, 09:56 PM

Rogue and Louie are neck and neck. Louie keeps voting with ghost accounts

Dark Horse · 07-13-09, 05:12 AM

Why is a non-tennis evaluator like me on this list?

KingRevolver · 07-13-09, 08:22 AM

You still voted for yourself. Don't lie

yisman · 07-13-09, 11:05 AM

Originally posted by KingRevolver

Rogue and Louie are neck and neck. Louie keeps voting with ghost accounts

He's using OTW's ghosts. Note OTW's usage of the word 'we'.

Anyway, I think CluelessLou is the most prolific and incompetent tennis poster we have.

I didn't vote for him, though, since he seems to think it's a good thing and his ego is threatening to blow up the subforum.

If we're going with posters who have a clue about tennis handicapping, I think Rogue is my favorite, but I like to read EP's write-ups as well.

RogueScholar · 07-13-09, 03:56 PM

Awww Yisman, you're too sweet. You're my favorite tennis poster too actually, because you're not afraid to get involved in the "politics" of our little community. I love the way you speak your mind and try to make this place better for the rest of us. You are also our first-line of defense against misinformation, which is too often overlooked.

KingRevolver · 07-13-09, 04:21 PM

I find it odd that every time Rogue goes up by one...Lou gets another vote. LOL

Fischnasty · 07-13-09, 04:24 PM

Originally posted by KingRevolver

I find it odd that every time Rogue goes up by one...Lou gets another vote. LOL

screenshots might be in order here king. this could be groundbreaking stuff.

SBR Lou · 07-13-09, 04:25 PM

Originally posted by KingRevolver

I find it odd that every time Rogue goes up by one...Lou gets another vote. LOL

I really love the fact that some posters think of things in this light, if I wanted to corrupt the poll it would take all but a second to edit the amount of votes and no one would know the difference, but that would be completely pathetic and of low integrity.

I have myself to blame in some ways, but I'm wanting to get back to capping tennis, keeping a record, and cut back on some of the silly antics I have had a hand in.

KingRevolver · 07-13-09, 04:27 PM

Originally posted by Fischnasty

screenshots might be in order here king. this could be groundbreaking stuff.

That's your specialty

Don't post our sex conversation, you freak!

RogueScholar · 07-13-09, 04:33 PM

Lou, you have my total support in that spirit. I know I've stooped to some childish antics right along with you, and if you're willing to set aside the hyperbole, I'm certainly willing to stop with the low blows and petty bickering. We should have higher standards, I agree.

KingRevolver · 07-13-09, 04:35 PM

Originally posted by RogueScholar

Lou, you have my total support in that spirit. I know I've stooped to some childish antics right along with you, and if you're willing to set aside the hyperbole, I'm certainly willing to stop with the low blows and petty bickering. We should have higher standards, I agree.

Low blows?

Dark Horse · 07-13-09, 04:36 PM

Originally posted by CrazyLou

I'm wanting to get back to capping tennis, keeping a record, and cut back on some of the silly antics I have had a hand in.

Such as starting this thread?

Your only mistake is that you consider yourself an expert tennis evaluator. If you saw and projected yourself as a student of the game instead, there would have been no silly antics. Instead of having to back up and defend crazy statements with even crazier statements you could then have focused on improving your skills.

RogueScholar · 07-13-09, 08:49 PM

We can't let this end in a tie. Anybody else care to weigh in?

KingRevolver · 07-13-09, 09:06 PM

I feel like making a ghost account and giving JohnnyV a mercy vote. The poor bastard voted for himself...and that was it.

Does the poll ever expire? I don't see a date on it so I'm guessing it doesn't.

Dark Horse · 07-14-09, 12:48 AM

Give my vote to yisman. I hadn't even considered voting until KRevolver suggested that I vote for myself, which, to my infinite shame, I immediately did.

KingRevolver · 07-14-09, 12:57 AM

Originally posted by Dark Horse

Give my vote to yisman. I hadn't even considered voting until KRevolver suggested that I vote for myself, which, to my infinite shame, I immediately did.

Razz_Donkey · 07-14-09, 01:18 AM

This seems classless. What's the point, other than self promotion and an ego boost? Also, does picking a +1150 make up for countless -500 losers? With all due respect, you appear to have serious illusions of grandeur.

PAPSMEAR · 07-14-09, 01:22 AM

Originally posted by EaglesPhan36

You guys do realize that the word prolific has nothing to do with picking winners right? Prolific is simply putting out a great number of posts than some one else. I'm not even sure Lou wins by that definition.

Agreed

Prolific posts means nothing in trying to ascertain star tennis capper

Prolific means he who puts out the most plays (not necessarily winning plays)

On that basis the whole poll and thread is pointless

KingRevolver · 07-14-09, 02:03 AM

Originally posted by PAPSMEAR

Agreed

Prolific posts means nothing in trying to ascertain star tennis capper

Prolific means he who puts out the most plays (not necessarily winning plays)

On that basis the whole poll and thread is pointless

LOL The funny thing is I thought about this when he first posted it but I then thought that was also part of his point. I think he's saying that he's been highly productive in lobbying for Tennis and having it being accepted at SBR, i.e. reasons 1 and 2 in his initial post. A synonym would be fertile. Who knows, maybe he had no clue as to what he was saying...Eh - whatever - LOL

I think the thread is rather silly but I also find it somewhat entertaining.

This SBR is too much.

PAPSMEAR · 07-14-09, 02:14 AM

Originally posted by KingRevolver

LOL The funny thing is I thought about this when he first posted it but I then thought that was also part of his point. I think he's saying that he's been highly productive in lobbying for Tennis and having it being accepted at SBR, i.e. reasons 1 and 2 in his initial post. A synonym would be fertile. Who knows, maybe he had no clue as to what he was saying...Eh - whatever - LOL

I think the thread is rather silly but I also find it somewhat entertaining.

This SBR is too much.

By way of analogy, I'm not sure that by me starting a billion different threads and making as many picks (win, lose or draw) on the women's hopscotch would necessarily be productive and advance the interest of that "sport" at SBR...that said if these indivduals need some recognition to float their boat go for it I guess

KingRevolver · 07-14-09, 02:14 AM

Originally posted by RogueScholar

We can't let this end in a tie. Anybody else care to weigh in?

You got it

It'll be tied in the morning

KingRevolver · 07-14-09, 02:16 AM

Originally posted by PAPSMEAR

By way of analogy, I'm not sure that by me starting a billion different threads and making as many picks (win, lose or draw) on the women's hopscotch would necessarily be productive and advance the interest of that "sport" at SBR...that said if these indivduals need some recognition to float their boat go for it I guess

I like your name, too.

PAPSMEAR · 07-14-09, 02:22 AM

Thanks KR I like to think it's "catchy"