http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor <--- MLB park factors
So my theory is the dog beats the favorite more often than not in a close game (1 or 2 run differential) as opposed to a larger margin of victory.
Since pitcher's parks should lend themselves to a lower scoring game (over time), I'm proposing a play on dogs at pitcher's parks (the top 10).
Obviously some filtering would need to be done (i.e. don't bet on the Nationals etc.
). What do you think?
So my theory is the dog beats the favorite more often than not in a close game (1 or 2 run differential) as opposed to a larger margin of victory.
Since pitcher's parks should lend themselves to a lower scoring game (over time), I'm proposing a play on dogs at pitcher's parks (the top 10).
Obviously some filtering would need to be done (i.e. don't bet on the Nationals etc.
). What do you think?