jj getting his baby dick hurt over sweep. Whole thing is irrelevant since the manager is not likely to stay on phone with a customer and answer a ton of questions. They will refer you to a website that has faqs.
-
Comment -
No, this is wrong. It's not about listening, it's about recording a conversation on the phone without the other person's knowledge or permission.Originally posted by Optional
Many customer service centers have a disclosure that things are recorded for quality purposes.
It is not the same in every state. I think Lewinsky/Jones/Clinton scandal involves a conversation that was recorded without consent or knowledge but it didn't matter in that state.Comment -
SBR would not be liable, they would have the evidence though.Originally posted by jjgold
In some states, this can be a pretty serious crime.Comment -
lol...exactly.Originally posted by Grits n' GravyComment -
stick to what you knowOriginally posted by Optional
donutsComment -
Just pointing out legal angles
Don't fuk with casinosComment -
Every state but Nevada, if I'm not mistaken.Originally posted by RudyRuetigger
Sweeper!!! Good to see you again pal. How's your 2018 going so far? You up or down for the year??? Hope all is well, brother. Always a pleasureComment -
Gritter prob spot on....even if I get the suit on the phone he probably wont answer anything directly. Whats the approach fellas
Im ready
Comment -
you are mistaken BIGLYOriginally posted by TheSchafeComment -
Hmm...must have changed then. I only know that because that Comedy Central puppet prank call show Crank Yankers had to be produced in Nevada because at the time it was the only state that didn't require the other party's consent to record the call.Originally posted by RudyRuetiggerComment -
What do you guys think "One Party Consent" means?
My family business was private investigating for many years. I know about surveillance related laws and 100% understand what One Party Consent means.
Sweep is one party.
Only his consent is required.
One party to the call..Comment -
If you did that it would severely curtail your ability to comment on pretty much anything RudyOriginally posted by RudyRuetigger
Not that I don't enjoy your attempts..Comment -
my fault for not understanding your postOriginally posted by Optional
but do not use double negatives when reporting
THANKS
I will say illinois needs both parties apparently which is why jj said what he did
OK?//////////////Comment -
Originally posted by Optional
Probably bad posture for me to just record and post it here, I think the better approach is to just flat out say "would you like to go on record and answer a few questions "....Comment -
It's fine: http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/new-...-recording-lawOriginally posted by sweep
But do as you feel most comfortable with. I'd prefer to either ask, or tell, the other person if I planned to publish the recording too i guess..Comment -
No worries Rudy.Originally posted by RudyRuetigger
.Comment -
go to the bar and get nachos and millersOriginally posted by RudyRuetiggerComment -
If sweeper asked the guy there’s no problem posting anyway give us a report we all want to know what’s going on down there in Atlantic City
Only reason I brought this up because I read the story the other day I don’t want to see the kid get in troubleComment -
Comment -
what happened?Comment -
massage/hooker service comps...do we get anything?Comment -
lol fukk, love your degeneracyOriginally posted by sweepGritter prob spot on....even if I get the suit on the phone he probably wont answer anything directly. Whats the approach fellas Im ready
Comment -
yeah, i was about to call fukkin fagg-ot shit on this oneOriginally posted by Optional
people are seriously concerned with recording some scumbag book boss hahahaha
max sentence is a $5 fineComment -
Guys we try to cover all the legal angles
Recent wave of arrests that is why..can care less what Sweeper does
MAN MY JOBComment -
He’s a smart guy I’m sure he’ll be fine, most people know doing the opposite of JJ puts them in good shapeOriginally posted by jjgoldComment -
lolComment -
not federal wiretapping /evesdropping violations on a legal casinoOriginally posted by phinfan27615
It is a no noComment -
It might seem like no big deal but you can really get fukked if you play that wrong.Originally posted by jjgoldComment -
sweeper, i'll pay the $5 fine
get this shit doneComment -
California is $2500 fine per violation and/or jail or state prison time.
Repeat offenders pay $10,000 per violation and time.Comment -
cool, nobody in the history of the country got max penalties unless theyre black
non-issue joke shitComment -
Reigle look it up
An eighth grader got locked up the other day for taping a teacher without him knowing
The teacher or administrator call the policeComment -
sounds too gay
how poor was the family? any dork that made it out of law school would counter sue for the raging faggotry of the situation and put on a precedenceComment -
No reigle, this is not taken lightly. They do not want this to get out of hand. There's a reason recorded conversations aren't all over the place and that punishments can be worse than DUI's.Comment -
ok. i'll do it then
dont want anyone getting locked upComment
