Sweeper calling in LIVE to Borgata race & sports manager @ 1pm eastern

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Grits n' Gravy
    Restricted User
    • 06-10-10
    • 13024

    #36
    jj getting his baby dick hurt over sweep. Whole thing is irrelevant since the manager is not likely to stay on phone with a customer and answer a ton of questions. They will refer you to a website that has faqs.
    Comment
    • KVB
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 05-29-14
      • 74817

      #37
      Originally posted by Optional
      Bloody drama queens.

      I bet there is not even 1 state where you are not allowed to record your own phone calls.

      Sweep is one party to the conversation, so he is allowed to record.

      If you are listening in your are not allowed.
      No, this is wrong. It's not about listening, it's about recording a conversation on the phone without the other person's knowledge or permission.

      Many customer service centers have a disclosure that things are recorded for quality purposes.

      It is not the same in every state. I think Lewinsky/Jones/Clinton scandal involves a conversation that was recorded without consent or knowledge but it didn't matter in that state.
      Comment
      • KVB
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 05-29-14
        • 74817

        #38
        Originally posted by jjgold
        If there is no consent SBR could be libel

        I would check into it
        SBR would not be liable, they would have the evidence though.

        In some states, this can be a pretty serious crime.
        Comment
        • KVB
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 05-29-14
          • 74817

          #39
          Originally posted by Grits n' Gravy
          jj getting his baby dick hurt over sweep. Whole thing is irrelevant since the manager is not likely to stay on phone with a customer and answer a ton of questions. They will refer you to a website that has faqs.
          lol...exactly.
          Comment
          • RudyRuetigger
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 08-24-10
            • 65084

            #40
            Originally posted by Optional
            Bloody drama queens.

            I bet there is not even 1 state where you are not allowed to record your own phone calls.

            Sweep is one party to the conversation, so he is allowed to record.

            If you are listening in your are not allowed.
            stick to what you know






            donuts
            Comment
            • jjgold
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 07-20-05
              • 388179

              #41
              Just pointing out legal angles

              Don't fuk with casinos
              Comment
              • TheSchafe
                SBR MVP
                • 12-29-09
                • 2143

                #42
                Originally posted by RudyRuetigger
                depends on which state this occurs in
                Every state but Nevada, if I'm not mistaken.

                Sweeper!!! Good to see you again pal. How's your 2018 going so far? You up or down for the year??? Hope all is well, brother. Always a pleasure
                Comment
                • sweep
                  SBR Posting Legend
                  • 10-09-10
                  • 16753

                  #43
                  Gritter prob spot on....even if I get the suit on the phone he probably wont answer anything directly. Whats the approach fellas Im ready



                  Comment
                  • RudyRuetigger
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 08-24-10
                    • 65084

                    #44
                    Originally posted by TheSchafe
                    Every state but Nevada, if I'm not mistaken.
                    you are mistaken BIGLY
                    Comment
                    • TheSchafe
                      SBR MVP
                      • 12-29-09
                      • 2143

                      #45
                      Originally posted by RudyRuetigger
                      you are mistaken BIGLY
                      Hmm...must have changed then. I only know that because that Comedy Central puppet prank call show Crank Yankers had to be produced in Nevada because at the time it was the only state that didn't require the other party's consent to record the call.
                      Comment
                      • Optional
                        Administrator
                        • 06-10-10
                        • 61703

                        #46
                        What do you guys think "One Party Consent" means?

                        My family business was private investigating for many years. I know about surveillance related laws and 100% understand what One Party Consent means.

                        Sweep is one party.

                        Only his consent is required.

                        One party to the call.
                        .
                        Comment
                        • Optional
                          Administrator
                          • 06-10-10
                          • 61703

                          #47
                          Originally posted by RudyRuetigger
                          stick to what you know
                          If you did that it would severely curtail your ability to comment on pretty much anything Rudy

                          Not that I don't enjoy your attempts.
                          .
                          Comment
                          • RudyRuetigger
                            SBR Aristocracy
                            • 08-24-10
                            • 65084

                            #48
                            Originally posted by Optional
                            What do you guys think "One Party Consent" means?

                            My family business was private investigating for many years. I know about surveillance related laws and 100% understand what One Party Consent means.

                            Sweep is one party.

                            Only his consent is required.

                            One party to the call.
                            my fault for not understanding your post

                            but do not use double negatives when reporting

                            THANKS





                            I will say illinois needs both parties apparently which is why jj said what he did

                            OK?//////////////
                            Comment
                            • sweep
                              SBR Posting Legend
                              • 10-09-10
                              • 16753

                              #49
                              Originally posted by Optional
                              What do you guys think "One Party Consent" means?

                              My family business was private investigating for many years. I know about surveillance related laws and 100% understand what One Party Consent means.

                              Sweep is one party.

                              Only his consent is required.

                              One party to the call.

                              Probably bad posture for me to just record and post it here, I think the better approach is to just flat out say "would you like to go on record and answer a few questions "....
                              Comment
                              • Optional
                                Administrator
                                • 06-10-10
                                • 61703

                                #50
                                Originally posted by sweep


                                Probably bad posture for me to just record and post it here, I think the better approach is to just flat out say "would you like to go on record and answer a few questions "....
                                It's fine: http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/new-...-recording-law

                                But do as you feel most comfortable with. I'd prefer to either ask, or tell, the other person if I planned to publish the recording too i guess.
                                .
                                Comment
                                • Optional
                                  Administrator
                                  • 06-10-10
                                  • 61703

                                  #51
                                  Originally posted by RudyRuetigger
                                  my fault for not understanding your post

                                  but do not use double negatives when reporting

                                  THANKS





                                  I will say illinois needs both parties apparently which is why jj said what he did

                                  OK?//////////////
                                  No worries Rudy.
                                  .
                                  Comment
                                  • phinfan27615
                                    SBR MVP
                                    • 07-10-17
                                    • 1837

                                    #52
                                    Originally posted by RudyRuetigger
                                    1. will sbr survive now that it is legal

                                    2. what are their opinions on RUDY RUETIGGER

                                    3. should i get chickfila or dominos
                                    go to the bar and get nachos and millers
                                    Comment
                                    • jjgold
                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                      • 07-20-05
                                      • 388179

                                      #53
                                      If sweeper asked the guy there’s no problem posting anyway give us a report we all want to know what’s going on down there in Atlantic City


                                      Only reason I brought this up because I read the story the other day I don’t want to see the kid get in trouble
                                      Comment
                                      • KVB
                                        SBR Aristocracy
                                        • 05-29-14
                                        • 74817

                                        #54
                                        Comment
                                        • Chi_archie
                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                          • 07-22-08
                                          • 63172

                                          #55
                                          what happened?
                                          Comment
                                          • reigle9
                                            SBR Posting Legend
                                            • 10-25-07
                                            • 17879

                                            #56
                                            massage/hooker service comps...do we get anything?
                                            Comment
                                            • reigle9
                                              SBR Posting Legend
                                              • 10-25-07
                                              • 17879

                                              #57
                                              Originally posted by sweep
                                              Gritter prob spot on....even if I get the suit on the phone he probably wont answer anything directly. Whats the approach fellas Im ready



                                              lol fukk, love your degeneracy
                                              Comment
                                              • reigle9
                                                SBR Posting Legend
                                                • 10-25-07
                                                • 17879

                                                #58
                                                Originally posted by Optional
                                                Bloody drama queens.
                                                yeah, i was about to call fukkin fagg-ot shit on this one

                                                people are seriously concerned with recording some scumbag book boss hahahaha

                                                max sentence is a $5 fine
                                                Comment
                                                • jjgold
                                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                                  • 07-20-05
                                                  • 388179

                                                  #59
                                                  Guys we try to cover all the legal angles

                                                  Recent wave of arrests that is why..can care less what Sweeper does

                                                  MAN MY JOB
                                                  Comment
                                                  • phinfan27615
                                                    SBR MVP
                                                    • 07-10-17
                                                    • 1837

                                                    #60
                                                    Originally posted by jjgold
                                                    Guys we try to cover all the legal angles

                                                    Recent wave of arrests that is why..can care less what Sweeper does

                                                    MAN MY JOB
                                                    He’s a smart guy I’m sure he’ll be fine, most people know doing the opposite of JJ puts them in good shape
                                                    Comment
                                                    • reigle9
                                                      SBR Posting Legend
                                                      • 10-25-07
                                                      • 17879

                                                      #61
                                                      lol
                                                      Comment
                                                      • jjgold
                                                        SBR Aristocracy
                                                        • 07-20-05
                                                        • 388179

                                                        #62
                                                        Originally posted by phinfan27615
                                                        He’s a smart guy I’m sure he’ll be fine, most people know doing the opposite of JJ puts them in good shape
                                                        not federal wiretapping /evesdropping violations on a legal casino

                                                        It is a no no
                                                        Comment
                                                        • KVB
                                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                                          • 05-29-14
                                                          • 74817

                                                          #63
                                                          Originally posted by jjgold
                                                          not federal wiretapping /evesdropping violations on a legal casino

                                                          It is a no no
                                                          It might seem like no big deal but you can really get fukked if you play that wrong.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • reigle9
                                                            SBR Posting Legend
                                                            • 10-25-07
                                                            • 17879

                                                            #64
                                                            sweeper, i'll pay the $5 fine

                                                            get this shit done
                                                            Comment
                                                            • KVB
                                                              SBR Aristocracy
                                                              • 05-29-14
                                                              • 74817

                                                              #65
                                                              California is $2500 fine per violation and/or jail or state prison time.

                                                              Repeat offenders pay $10,000 per violation and time.
                                                              Comment
                                                              • reigle9
                                                                SBR Posting Legend
                                                                • 10-25-07
                                                                • 17879

                                                                #66
                                                                cool, nobody in the history of the country got max penalties unless theyre black

                                                                non-issue joke shit
                                                                Comment
                                                                • jjgold
                                                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                                                  • 07-20-05
                                                                  • 388179

                                                                  #67
                                                                  Reigle look it up

                                                                  An eighth grader got locked up the other day for taping a teacher without him knowing

                                                                  The teacher or administrator call the police
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • reigle9
                                                                    SBR Posting Legend
                                                                    • 10-25-07
                                                                    • 17879

                                                                    #68
                                                                    sounds too gay

                                                                    how poor was the family? any dork that made it out of law school would counter sue for the raging faggotry of the situation and put on a precedence
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • KVB
                                                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                                                      • 05-29-14
                                                                      • 74817

                                                                      #69
                                                                      No reigle, this is not taken lightly. They do not want this to get out of hand. There's a reason recorded conversations aren't all over the place and that punishments can be worse than DUI's.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      • reigle9
                                                                        SBR Posting Legend
                                                                        • 10-25-07
                                                                        • 17879

                                                                        #70
                                                                        ok. i'll do it then

                                                                        dont want anyone getting locked up
                                                                        Comment
                                                                        Search
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        SBR Contests
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Working...