with their .292 winning % that is about the record they are due for?
that's about the 2003 tigers mark....
but otherwise we've seen nothing close to this sort of futility in 99% of the lifetimes of posters here....
is this team really this bad? or can we expect them to start regressing towards the mean? what is their pythorgean w-l record projected to be?
they have some talent.... enough you wouldn't think they would be an all time top 20 worst record in the majors.....
zimmerman, dunn, guzman, dukes
was thinking of martingaling against their current hot streak... but on second thought, maybe the best though is a prudent picking my spots backing of the nats... they can't be this bad can they?
that's about the 2003 tigers mark....
but otherwise we've seen nothing close to this sort of futility in 99% of the lifetimes of posters here....
is this team really this bad? or can we expect them to start regressing towards the mean? what is their pythorgean w-l record projected to be?
they have some talent.... enough you wouldn't think they would be an all time top 20 worst record in the majors.....
zimmerman, dunn, guzman, dukes
was thinking of martingaling against their current hot streak... but on second thought, maybe the best though is a prudent picking my spots backing of the nats... they can't be this bad can they?