Jason Day
Hideki Matsuyama
Bubba Watson
2 shots
Unders 281.5
Under 151.5
Unders 65.5
Yes
No
Hideki Matsuyama
Bubba Watson
2 shots
Unders 281.5
Under 151.5
Unders 65.5
Yes
No
-
Comment -
Henrik Stenson
Brendan Steele
Jason Day
Winning margin: 2 Shots
Winning score: U 281.5 (par 288)
Cut score: O151.5 (par 144)
Lowest single score: U 65.5
Tiger makes the cut?: Yes
Will there be a hole-in-one?: NoComment -
closed thank you for entering and good luck
Comment -
I would like to clarify that "Johnson" in post #29 is of course Dustin JohnsonComment -
The over 65.5 is still in play. No hole in one yet.Comment -
Zach Johnson had a better round today.Comment -
Zach Johnson was high up on the leaderboard and Dustin had not even teed off yet
When I saw Zach all over the leaderboard I realized I didn't put "Dustin" Johnson
If I was trying to pull something I would have said I meant ZachComment -
Zach had pars on first 6 holes Thursday. Zach shot a 63 and two 64's in tournaments this year he is good for a very low round when he is on.Comment -
He was in good shape and on the leaderboard. He was what, 200/1 pre tourney, while Dustin was something like 12/1? So it's obvious what happened. I gained no advantage because I pointed it out early and Dustin had not teed off yet, but what is it you want? Do you want me to withdraw? It was not stated to post full names so I didn't break any rules purposefully or accidentally, and Zach Johnson was not on my radar so I didn't even think about him until I saw him on the leaderboard.
Do you want me to withdraw? If I am told I have to do that because of this BS expect to get slowrolled regularly
Comment -
Just when everyone thought Tiger Woods was ready for the come back, he is back to struggling.Comment -
It seems like you should be disqualified for not specifying, clearly it isn't fair to give anyone the choice of 2 golfers to be named after the contest starts (regardless of which one you meant)He was in good shape and on the leaderboard. He was what, 200/1 pre tourney, while Dustin was something like 12/1? So it's obvious what happened. I gained no advantage because I pointed it out early and Dustin had not teed off yet, but what is it you want? Do you want me to withdraw? It was not stated to post full names so I didn't break any rules purposefully or accidentally, and Zach Johnson was not on my radar so I didn't even think about him until I saw him on the leaderboard.
Do you want me to withdraw? If I am told I have to do that because of this BS expect to get slowrolled regularlyComment -
Oh does it seem like that? That I purposefully was ambiguous by posting Johnson? Do you really think there was any evidence of intent or an advantage taken by me since I clarified it early on the 1st day when the other Johnson was doing well compared to everyone and my guy had not teed off yet? You go ahead and ask Drew to make a decision and I will abide by it.Comment -
I didn't even choose to make an entry to win the other $200, but Empiremaker thinks I hatched a plan that would never work to help me out in winning $150, sureComment -
Sure some guys got knocked out with some decent names missing cut..
Come on Poulter can you have one great round now that you made the cut barely?Comment -
considering when he said something and the johnson he didnt even pick was doing just fine thru a couple holes and.dustin hadnt even hit the course yet, I am not sure how that shows anything at all. much less Dlo trying to pull something.Comment -
So far......
Cut Score- Under
Lowest Single Score- Over*
Tiger - Made the cut
Hole in One- No (need to double check)*
* = subject to changeComment -
No, what you did is freeroll two players, for the price of one, whether that was your intention or not. If you clarified before the tournament started you wouldn't have gotten an unfair advantage (whether that was your intention or not) you didn't. There is a reason the contest was declared CLOSED. You specified which Johnson after it was closed, so either you A) knew that not specifying was a problem or B) were trying to cheat. Even if you weren't trying to get an advantage just typing Johnson doesn't specify which Johnson.Comment -
Or c)I never even thought about Zach Johnson until I saw him on the leaderboard and realized I should have put full names
None of what you say makes sense. I gained no advantage. I pointed it out early on the first day. Dustin Johnson was a tourney favorite, while Zach Johnson was a longshot. If I really was angle shooting I would have waited until someone called me on it so I could choose the best player as late as possible. The example in the first post was in last names only, and without thinking about it I did the same thing. Why would I cheat to gain an edge to win $150, but not enter the bonus for $200?
Have you asked yourself these questions, or are you just trolling? Seems like there's a lot of that latelyComment -
When has SBR ever let people edit there entries after the deadline? is that something that should happen ? He knew his entry covered 2 players at some point or he wouldn't have bothered with the "oh obviously" post after the contest closedComment -
So anybody that selected Garcia is out? Were there any other golfers selected that missed the cut?
Anybody that used Mickelson or Woods is probably done and not gonna be able to make up this many strokes
Nobody selected the leader Reed?Comment -
Yeah baby, bury these libtard trolls baby!!! LOCK HER UP!!!!!!Or c)I never even thought about Zach Johnson until I saw him on the leaderboard and realized I should have put full names
None of what you say makes sense. I gained no advantage. I pointed it out early on the first day. Dustin Johnson was a tourney favorite, while Zach Johnson was a longshot. If I really was angle shooting I would have waited until someone called me on it so I could choose the best player as late as possible. The example in the first post was in last names only, and without thinking about it I did the same thing. Why would I cheat to gain an edge to win $150, but not enter the bonus for $200?
Have you asked yourself these questions, or are you just trolling? Seems like there's a lot of that latelyComment -
The whole last name business could present the same issue on the NFL Draft contest.
Everyone is picking Bradley Chubb. The problem is there is a Nick Chubb (UGA) who I think is a 3rd round guy. Nick Chubb is ranked as a 3rd or 4th RB in many draft analysis so it’s a feasible pick. Unlikely that’s anyone’s intent but what are going to do.
No disrespect to those who disagree, but I think dlowilly meant Dustin Johnson.
I think, however, Drew will be the arbiter if needed.
Just my .02 cents.
Fair Warning: If you put just “Chubb” on the NFL contest, I would follow up with another post with a first name.Comment
