An unbiased estimator of poster quality

[mathdotcom]

Relevant variables:
-Number of posts
-Quality of posts

My proxy for quality of posts = [(Avg number of thread views by posters other than thread starter) + (Avg number of replies to posts by poster of interest) + 5*(Avg number of "" per thread started by poster of interest] = X

Poster Quality = aX + b(Number of Posts)

I suggest a = 1 and b = 0.34

[flyingillini]

[TheIntegrityKid]

Relevant variables:
-Number of posts
-Quality of posts

My proxy for quality of posts = [(Avg number of thread views by posters other than thread starter) + (Avg number of replies to posts by poster of interest) + 5*(Avg number of "" per thread started by poster of interest] = X

Poster Quality = aX + b(Number of Posts)

I suggest a = 1 and b = 0.34

I think someone is tryin to pick on me because he felt disrespected that I dare ask about a pick, when all I wanted was to find out why he liked the under lol

So sensitive...

[mathdotcom]

Integrity, those discussions always turn into:

"I like the under because I think the pitchers will be hot"
'Yeah but Pitcher A's last start was not so good'
"I think he will be better today"
'I'm not so sure. And I think Batter B will be really hot today.'
"I disagree, he has a terrible record against Pitcher A."
'Yeah but today is his birthday so he will be hot.'
"You're an idiot."
'Go fukk yourself'

Just take the pick and enjoy the free money

[flyingillini]

I think someone is tryin to pick on me because he felt disrespected that I dare ask about a pick, when all I wanted was to find out why he liked the under lol

So sensitive...

Nope, Mathy is not being sensitive. There are things about posters and things about SBR which you will soon learn in time. All I am saying if you receive a PM with a poster wanting to meet up, I would not do it, as your safety might be in danger. God Bless you and your plays.

[MrMonkey]

Flyingillini, with all due respect, get the gun you had in your previous avatar and shoot the guy in your avatar presently!

MrMonkey

[TheIntegrityKid]

Integrity, those discussions always turn into:

"I like the under because I think the pitchers will be hot"
'Yeah but Pitcher A's last start was not so good'
"I think he will be better today"
'I'm not so sure. And I think Batter B will be really hot today.'
"I disagree, he has a terrible record against Pitcher A."
'Yeah but today is his birthday so he will be hot.'
"You're an idiot."
'Go fukk yourself'

Just take the pick and enjoy the free money

Will do sir and I'll NEVER ask you to explain a pick again. I guess with you, no reason is needed...Fair enough

[flyingillini]

Flyingillini, with all due respect, get the gun you had in your previous avatar and shoot the guy in your avatar presently!

MrMonkey

It is at the Gun Shop right now, getting it cleaned. Will do when I pick it up today.

[mathdotcom]

lion eye, is that a certain rabbi in your picture!?

[flyingillini]

Yes the one from the Show, I think he is doing time at the moment. God Bless the girl that looks like a guy that works for perverted justice.

[mathdotcom]

lion eye, change your avatar back to rabbi. This new one has got to go.

[mathdotcom]

aka David A. Kaye aka "REDBD"

[mathdotcom]

[flyingillini]

God Bless this thread.

[mathdotcom]

no wonder you've converted to Islam, lion eye. They are much more discrete with their child abuse.

[Willie Bee]

1) Search the last 500 posts by a poster.

2) Count the number of times they are just smilies.

3) Count the number of posts that are merely attacking a poster and not discussing the topic at hand.

4) Add 2 and 3 together.

5) If they exceed 100, Fail.

[AgainstAllOdds]

[Dbldown11]

Relevant variables:
-Number of posts
-Quality of posts

My proxy for quality of posts = [(Avg number of thread views by posters other than thread starter) + (Avg number of replies to posts by poster of interest) + 5*(Avg number of "" per thread started by poster of interest] = X

Poster Quality = aX + b(Number of Posts)

I suggest a = 1 and b = 0.34

I'm not a math wiz BY ANY MEANS....but why would you multiply X by 1 and add that to b times the number of posts????

X will always remain X then.....so why multiply it by 1 at all?

[mathdotcom]

I'm not a math wiz BY ANY MEANS....but why would you multiply X by 1 and add that to b times the number of posts????

X will always remain X then.....so why multiply it by 1 at all?

I see that

[TheIntegrityKid]

1) Search the last 500 posts by a poster.

2) Count the number of times they are just smilies.

3) Count the number of posts that are merely attacking a poster and not discussing the topic at hand.

4) Add 2 and 3 together.

5) If they exceed 100, Fail.

I guess mine would be 500 then... well in a couple days when I am at 500 haha

oops, I meant mine would be 0, that my 500 would be legit lol

[Willie Bee]

Oh, if there is a single post condemning an entire culture, ethnic group or religion, Epic Fail.

[mathdotcom]

Willie, it seems you're condemning an entire culture of racists.

[Dbldown11]

I see that

So....how am I wrong? instead of being a ****ing jackass how about you explain yourself?

X multiplied by 1 will always be X....no???

[flyingillini]

The Rabbi has got to be in Protective Custody, there is no way in hell he is in General Population.

[TheIntegrityKid]

So....how am I wrong? instead of being a ****ing jackass how about you explain yourself?

X multiplied by 1 will always be X....no???

Watch out Dbldown11,

you may get the same warning about SBR meeting to potentially ban you too

[MrMonkey]

1) Search the last 500 posts by a poster.

2) Count the number of times they are just smilies.

3) Count the number of posts that are merely attacking a poster and not discussing the topic at hand.

4) Add 2 and 3 together.

5) If they exceed 100, Fail.

If trying to be funny posts with no serious harm intended fall under the attacking catagory? If so, then Monkey might be in the fail column of late?

MrMonkey

[mathdotcom]

So....how am I wrong? instead of being a ****ing jackass how about you explain yourself?

X multiplied by 1 will always be X....no???

1*X = X only if 1 is a positive integer whose infinite limit approaches 1.

[flyingillini]

God Bless the Math Genius

[Dbldown11]

........so I'm right anytime you multiply X by 1 it will equal X. Thank you

[TheIntegrityKid]

........so I'm right anytime you multiply X by 1 it will equal X. Thank you

I'm pretty sure I don't care if that Blair dude likes me or not, cuz I'm beginning to really like Dbldown11

And ofcourse Nicky and lakerboy.

Not that anyone else cares or anything, but props to Dbldown11 for stating his case and not backing down

[Dbldown11]

haha well I'm just pointing out the obvious. that's standard second grade math. Thanks though Integrity

[mathdotcom]

Thanks for sticking up for your firmly held convictions.

[TheIntegrityKid]

Thanks for sticking up for your firmly held convictions.

dont take this the wrong way, but you sir are a riot

i dont care if you hate me or not, but you are certainly entertaining me

[Willie Bee]

Willie, it seems you're condemning an entire culture of racists.

Just as it seems to me you're confusing bigotry, hatred and ignorance with 'culture.' God bless.

[TheIntegrityKid]

haha well I'm just pointing out the obvious. that's standard second grade math. Thanks though Integrity

no prob Dd11

I really liked your Obama posts... good stuff