Does SBR have a moral obligation if they spot a poster with a problem?

onthewhat · 05-21-09, 05:26 PM

No

jjgold · 05-21-09, 05:31 PM

YES

Same as a bartender that sees a customer drinking too much.

tacomax · 05-21-09, 05:31 PM

They have an obligation to get them to click on as many affiliate links as possible.

unde0087 · 05-21-09, 05:36 PM

SBR isn't anyone's mom or dad, if they are responsible for others lack of money managment then SBR owes Landers around $90K.

People are responsible for their own actions!

AMBlai01 · 05-21-09, 05:37 PM

do they have an obligation? NO But to be able to look in the mirror at the end of the night...maybe they should do something.

onthewhat · 05-21-09, 05:42 PM

Originally posted by tacomax

They have an obligation to get them to click on as many affiliate links as possible.

This is their stance

BestPlay2day · 05-21-09, 05:42 PM

No, chances are those type of posters are storytellers anyways. It would be hard for SBR to know who's posting real bets and who is posting fake amounts.

Mudcat · 05-21-09, 05:50 PM

How would you even know who has a compulsive gambling problem on a forum? So much posing and pretend gambling going on.

Real gamblers are posting their picks at sportsbooks, not forums. That's where you would need to be to evaluate problems.

Last I checked SBR had a GA link. That's about all I would expect of them.

SlickFazzer · 05-21-09, 06:06 PM

Good info guys.