Dangerous precedent being set where cancer-chemo kid in MN is being stalked by state

[BrentCrude]

Yup,it just had to be Minnesota,the state where nothing is allowed that decided they know what's best for the cancer-chemo kid that refused treatment that's now on the lamb with his mom.Life is a crap shoot and if the parents and the kid don't want to go through the hell of risking death by chemo treatment,that's up to them.If you have a religion,god or spiritual belief in how you want to conduct your life,that trumps what the state believes you should do.

So now the mom takes off with the kid and they are paying close attention to my area where there are alot of wilderness campgrounds they may be hiding out at.A network tv van was at the hotel here in town last night.

While the state of Minnesota is telling people how to conduct their lives,why don't they go after other people like politicians and tell them it's mandatory to go in for operations.Maybe an operation equiping them with nads,brains and souls for starters.Bill Clinton is lucky he doesn't live here,they should under the precedent they set with the cancer kid, haul him in to the hospital against his will to give him a penile transplant to cure his peonies disease ridden micro penis.How about giving Al Franken a mandatory face transplant so he doesn't scare babies to death when he picks them up when on the campaign trail here in Minnesota.

[MonkeyF0cker]

This isn't a decision being made by an adult for their own livlihood. This is a decision being made by a parent for their child and it's lunacy. If you're an adult and you want to deny YOURSELF cancer treatment, fine. But if your child is dying, there is something wrong with your judgement if you are willing to let them die. The kid's parents should be burned at the stake.

[BestPlay2day]

This is different, his "parents" found their believes in treating this on the internet and it's a scam. This kid is 13 and homeschooled and can't even read and can't even read the word "the" which any 4 year old would know. If Daniel was an adult and refused treatment, that's different. He had a 95% chance to survive with chemo and will die without the chemo. His parents are killing him and if he dies they should be charged with manslaughter.

Now this stupid bitch is in hiding with her kid so hopefully she will do some jail time and have her kids taken away. This is no different than these stupid people who believe they can heal with only prayers instead of seeing a doctor and the kid dies. What if my child had cancer and I believed he should be treated by eating snicker bars since I read that on the internet somewhere?

[pavyracer]

I like this concept. Maybe we can send our troops to war armed with just pocket knives and pray to god for victory. Who needs techonology when you can have god on your side?