SIA re-opens discussion...

[Justin7]

SBR is once again discussing prior disputes with SIA. I have emailed everyone I know of that had a non-resolved dispute. I have not heard back from one player on a major dispute.

If you had an unresolved dispute with SIA, contact me.

[RogueScholar]

This is great to hear, SIA is another book that has had a rocky past but still serves as a great out for tennis punters.

[durito]

This is great to hear, SIA is another book that has had a rocky past but still serves as a great out for tennis punters.

yea those $100 tennis limits are a must have


SIA should, however, be rated far higher

[RogueScholar]

For a recreational player, that's about what I risk on my strong plays anyway. Not all of us are trying to make enough money at gambling to live off of, Durito. I just enjoy having multiple options as tennis is my favorite sport to wager on when there's no football, basketball or hockey going on.

[Justin7]

I agree that SIA has the potential to be rated much higher, especially based on their last 2 years. They have not had any "bad" disputes, their CS has improved, and they are processing well.

That said, I think they are "stuck" where they are rating wise until they address several older serious disputes.