When Hilary Wins, How Will it Affect Your Life?

[Optional]

a president/party has never done anything like that before in recent history.. oh wait, yes they did when they lied to the country and reagan about securing the border.


Give me one good reason why a wall should be obstructed? Just one good reason.

Also, the president does not get to enact policies he/she wants. That is not how it works nor should it work that way as we have seen with Obama. No change is often better than forcing change so obstructionists for president's like obama is exactly what any rational citizen would want. Obama has literally been one of the worst presidents in history, the most obviously, so hillary getting her way would only further the damage.



Your logic that a president's policy should be supported simply because they are a president is extremely illogical. Now factor in Obama and it is obvious that thought process is dangerously wrong.

I think the best reason against a wall is how effective it would be per dollar spent.

Estimates run from 10 to 20 bill to build it and then 2 to 5 billion per year to maintain and police it.

So 30 to 70 billion over the next 10 years.

If there really is that sort of loot available to divert from other spending, I'd say it deserves a bit of a think tank on how to use that massive amount to solve the actual issue. If that happened to turn out to be a wall, so be it. But does anyone really believe that with their hand over the heart. I'm sure Trump doesn't but knew it was a touchstone issue people could rally behind.

[Greget]

Any reasonable evidence to support that?




awesome non-response to what I said. Again, they would have never given the loans because they knew it was going to bankrupt them. And just like any good financier they made sure the loss did not fall on them.

again, the only thing you are offering is a clown show.

Hot dog boy asking for evidence after making the tired old "black people crashed the economy" idiot talk.

[brooks85]

^lol greget making up quotes. The desperation of that idiot is comical.

I think the best reason against a wall is how effective it would be per dollar spent.

Estimates run from 10 to 20 bill to build it and then 2 to 5 billion per year to maintain and police it.

So 30 to 70 billion over the next 10 years.

If there really is that sort of loot available to divert from other spending, I'd say it deserves a bit of a think tank on how to use that massive amount to solve the actual issue. If that happened to turn out to be a wall, so be it. But does anyone really believe that with their hand over the heart. I'm sure Trump doesn't but knew it was a touchstone issue people could rally behind.

considering it would save us a trillion that is ideal math in my world. You have to consider how much the illegals are costing the country, the wall is an obvious choice.

[Greget]

Here dummy, you won't believe it but maybe someone with a bit higher IQ will learn something.

However, the new evidence from Manuel Adelino of the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University, Antoinette Schoar of the MIT Sloan School of Management and Felipe Severino of the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth undermines this story. In their paper, "Changes in Buyer Composition and theExpansion of Credit During the Boom," the researchers found:

http://www.nber.org/papers/w20848

"While there was a rapid expansion in overall mortgage origination during this time period, the fraction of new mortgage dollars going to each income group was stable. In other words, the poor did not represent a higher fraction of the mortgage loans originated over the period. In addition, borrowers in the middle and top of the distribution are the ones that contributed most significantly to the increase in mortgages in default after 2007. Taken together, the evidence in the paper suggests that there was no decoupling of mortgage growth from income growth where unsustainable credit was flowing disproportionally to poor people."

[Greget]

Lots of previous evidence supports this conclusion. For example, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission established by Congress concluded:

"...the CRA was not a significant factor in subprime lending or the crisis. Many subprime lenders were not subject to the CRA. Research indicates only 6% of high-cost loans -- a proxy for subprime loans -- had any connection to the law. Loans made by CRA-regulated lenders in the neighborhoods in which they were required to lend were half as likely to default as similar loans made in the same neighborhoods by independent mortgage originators not subject to the law."

[brooks85]

Here dummy, you won't believe it but maybe someone with a bit higher IQ will learn something.

However, the new evidence from Manuel Adelino of the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University, Antoinette Schoar of the MIT Sloan School of Management and Felipe Severino of the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth undermines this story. In their paper, "Changes in Buyer Composition and theExpansion of Credit During the Boom," the researchers found:

http://www.nber.org/papers/w20848

"While there was a rapid expansion in overall mortgage origination during this time period, the fraction of new mortgage dollars going to each income group was stable. In other words, the poor did not represent a higher fraction of the mortgage loans originated over the period. In addition, borrowers in the middle and top of the distribution are the ones that contributed most significantly to the increase in mortgages in default after 2007. Taken together, the evidence in the paper suggests that there was no decoupling of mortgage growth from income growth where unsustainable credit was flowing disproportionally to poor people."

That is not relevant. Again, your ignorance leads you to believe any headline you read. You obviously don't understand what happened. The problem was that POOR represented any noticeable amount of the triple AAA rating garbage(supposedly full of good loans) their mortgages were lumped into because banks were FORCED to loan to them. So no, you have not found someone more intelligent than me unless they clarified that. Go ahead and quote if they did... lol


Being poor and having income/assets so you can actually pay your house bill is not the same as being poor with nothing then getting a $200k+ house on a balloon mortage you dummy.

[JIBBBY]

IF HILLARY IS PRESIDENT -

If Hillary gets elected I learn to speak Spanish or move out of Calimexico....

I then buy a bullet proof vest and wear it when out in crowded public places to ward off the shrap metal when the next suicide bomber detonates himself..

Lastly, I'll say goodbye to any hope of Social Security benefits and National security in the future.. I'll also brace myself for a massive future tax increase to manage the ballooning National debt that will continue to grow under Hillary Clinton administration....

[Optional]

Lots of previous evidence supports this conclusion. For example, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission established by Congress concluded:

"...the CRA was not a significant factor in subprime lending or the crisis. Many subprime lenders were not subject to the CRA. Research indicates only 6% of high-cost loans -- a proxy for subprime loans -- had any connection to the law. Loans made by CRA-regulated lenders in the neighborhoods in which they were required to lend were half as likely to default as similar loans made in the same neighborhoods by independent mortgage originators not subject to the law."

I guess because their lower priced properties were devalued less?

[jjgold]

IF HILLARY IS PRESIDENT -

If Hillary gets elected I learn to speak Spanish or move out of Calimexico....

I then buy a bullet proof vest and wear it when out in crowded public places to ward off the shrap metal when the next suicide bomber detonates himself..

Lastly, I'll say goodbye to any hope of Social Security benefits and National security in the future.. I'll also brace myself for a massive future tax increase to manage the ballooning National debt that will continue to grow under Hillary Clinton administration....

Pretty simple..Country ruined

Might be good idea to get of of USA

[JIBBBY]

Pretty simple..Country ruined

Might be good idea to get of of USA

No not get out of USA but just grit the teeth and bare down for another 4 years of garbage..

[Greget]

IF HILLARY IS PRESIDENT -

If Hillary gets elected I learn to speak Spanish or move out of Calimexico....

I then buy a bullet proof vest and wear it when out in crowded public places to ward off the shrap metal when the next suicide bomber detonates himself..

Lastly, I'll say goodbye to any hope of Social Security benefits and National security in the future.. I'll also brace myself for a massive future tax increase to manage the ballooning National debt that will continue to grow under Hillary Clinton administration....

Buhhh buy!!!!!!!!!!

America will be a better place without all the bigots and social/fiscal leeches.

[PittsburghPlayer]

worth repeating !!!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EKi6AEolx7s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>

[PittsburghPlayer]

No not get out of USA but just grit the teeth and bare down for another 4 years of garbage..

In four years, you are either dead...

or with a chip in Ya...

put me down for dead.

[PittsburghPlayer]

IF HILLARY IS PRESIDENT -

If Hillary gets elected I learn to speak Spanish or move out of Calimexico....

I then buy a bullet proof vest and wear it when out in crowded public places to ward off the shrap metal when the next suicide bomber detonates himself..

Lastly, I'll say goodbye to any hope of Social Security benefits and National security in the future.. I'll also brace myself for a massive future tax increase to manage the ballooning National debt that will continue to grow under Hillary Clinton administration....

Under ANY administration.

War ahead.

Bigger war ahead !

[khicks26]

Hot dog boy, can't come up with an intelligent response and defend his insane blabber so its back to the insults.

Go make me a hot dog, put extra relish on there son. Thanks.

Hot Dog Boy LOL

[brooks85]

^ a clear sign of desperation when you have khicks bump your posts lol

[brainfreeze]

tyranny


sneaking in after midnight to pass a law more than half the country didn't want(not exaggerating at all). And, now with hindsight we now for a fact the law is garbage. Even nancy pelosi admitted we have to pass the law to find out what is in it. Well, it's bad.

[PittsburghPlayer]

Buhhh buy!!!!!!!!!!

America will be a better place NEVER, NEVER, NEVER

fixed that for You.

[PittsburghPlayer]

^ a clear sign of desperation when you have khicks bump your posts lol

brook-trout, a clear sign of being a piece of shit that eats other mens worms...

stealing from employer or fat cow and three kids.

we hoped that you were dead.

[chico2663]

[QUOTE=PittsburghPlayer;25965280]In four years, you are either dead...

or with a chip in Ya...

put me down for dead.[/QUOTE
Did you know that Mexico did that to it's border agents about 5 years ago?

[khicks26]

^ a clear sign of desperation when you have khicks bump your posts lol

Brooks you have no idea what caused the crash. LOL

But I will agree that the problem was systemic & everyone played a part. Some just had a bigger role, namely the banks & corporate America's so called free trade deals.

Do your homework loser. Start in the mid 70's maybe you will get a clue.

[khicks26]

brook-trout, a clear sign of being a piece of shit that eats other mens worms...

stealing from employer or fat cow and three kids.

we hoped that you were dead.

LOL

[Ralphie Halves]

Back on the original topic for a second.

It won't affect me much right now. If all my dreams come true, then who is in office will affect me more. Not until then though.

Thing is, the whole "well if it doesn't affect you don't worry about it" argument is retarded. Some people care about the good of their country too, not just themselves and families. Since whoever is in office won't affect my life much right now, I care more about what it will do for the USA. A rising tide lifts all ships.

Aaaannnnnnd I'm still not voting anyway. Just hoping dems don't overrun the entire government, as they have no idea what's best for the greater good anymore.

[brooks85]

^so you're not going to vote? That is absurd considering what people fought for and the fact this is the first time in recent history where your vote could actually change something for the better.

Brooks you have no idea what caused the crash. LOL

But I will agree that the problem was systemic & everyone played a part. Some just had a bigger role, namely the banks & corporate America's so called free trade deals.

Do your homework loser. Start in the mid 70's maybe you will get a clue.

lying isn't going to help you

[brooks85]

brook-trout, a clear sign of being a piece of shit that eats other mens worms...

stealing from employer or fat cow and three kids.

we hoped that you were dead.

still putting those beers back hourly I see. At least that makes you good for something; paycheck to paycheck consumer.

[jtoler]

^so you're not going to vote? That is absurd considering what people fought for and the fact this is the first time in recent history where your vote could actually change something for the better.

What a stupid ideology.

[brooks85]

What a stupid ideology.

coming from the idiot that said bernie wasn't a socialist that is a good sign for me. I certainly don't need it but I appreciate the support.

[Grits n' Gravy]

Same as every other president during my lifetime, very minimal impact. My businesses are virtually recession proof.

Think a lot of people are going to be bent out of shape when she skates into White House. Republicans have nobody to blame but themselves. Couldn't find an electable candidate so they are stuck with a guy who has no shot in Trump.

[brooks85]

Same as every other president during my lifetime, very minimal impact. My businesses are virtually recession proof.

Think a lot of people are going to be bent out of shape when she skates into White House. Republicans have nobody to blame but themselves. Couldn't find an electable candidate so they are stuck with a guy who has no shot in Trump.

lol then you are TERRIBLE with numbers and/or infertile. Or I suppose just no plans to have kids and you don't care about any of your relatives including their future kin? Or do you have no family whatsoever?


I suppose if you had no kids or plans to have them, and no family or anyone you care about then you could at least reasonably have your position. In that case it just ends with you so being selfish isn't unreasonable.

[Grits n' Gravy]

lol then you are TERRIBLE with numbers and/or infertile. Or I suppose just no plans to have kids and you don't care about any of your relatives including their future kin? Or do you have no family whatsoever?


I suppose if you had no kids or plans to have them, and no family or anyone you care about then you could at least reasonably have your position. In that case it just ends with you so being selfish isn't unreasonable.

You are really a sad and pathetic excuse for a man. Probably explains why you act like a bitch. For someone like yourself that has a peon government job you sure do like to try and bite the hand that feeds you.

As for me, I don't rely on the government to take care of me or my family. My daughter will never want for anything in her lifetime because her father has put in the work to set things up for my entire family. Be accountable for yourself and quit blaming a government for your own failures in life brooks.

[TheMoneyShot]

She effects my life everyday because I have to look at that old ugly face.

[Tommy Karate]

Hey dipstick you don't think it has anything to do with those unfunded wars that Bush started? Bush made history as the first president to go to war without asking congress to pay for it.

you must be joking right now. 8 years of this pos and now lets blame Bush.
wow - you people are sick and blinded by the truth.

[rkelly110]

Back on the original topic for a second.

It won't affect me much right now. If all my dreams come true, then who is in office will affect me more. Not until then though.

Thing is, the whole "well if it doesn't affect you don't worry about it" argument is retarded. Some people care about the good of their country too, not just themselves and families. Since whoever is in office won't affect my life much right now, I care more about what it will do for the USA. A rising tide lifts all ships.

Aaaannnnnnd I'm still not voting anyway. Just hoping dems don't overrun the entire government, as they have no idea what's best for the greater good anymore.

^so you're not going to vote? That is absurd considering what people fought for and the fact this is the first time in recent history where your vote could actually change something for the better.

lying isn't going to help you

What a stupid ideology.

Sorry, I agree with brooks on this one.

[brooks85]

You are really a sad and pathetic excuse for a man. Probably explains why you act like a bitch. For someone like yourself that has a peon government job you sure do like to try and bite the hand that feeds you.

As for me, I don't rely on the government to take care of me or my family. My daughter will never want for anything in her lifetime because her father has put in the work to set things up for my entire family. Be accountable for yourself and quit blaming a government for your own failures in life brooks.

notice the need for your psyche to make things up to "needs" to be true. You're not fooling anyone as to what you are grits. I personally enjoy watching you try though.


Again, you must be terrible with numbers.

[The Kraken]

Brroks you are a desperate sheep that commits logical fallacies frequently