Nash 2016 MLB Baseball

iloseagain · 04-22-16, 07:29 PM

grand salami for the mets!! Weeee!

Miavia · 04-22-16, 08:17 PM

Let's go...Texas hopefully can get it going....

iloseagain · 04-22-16, 08:55 PM

damn this mets game needs to get it friggen going... jesus..

whydubya · 04-22-16, 09:55 PM

Rain delay..any way this gets called and our already won bet pushes?

Miavia · 04-22-16, 10:23 PM

Damn...This ain't good....

iloseagain · 04-22-16, 10:29 PM

Originally posted by whydubya

Rain delay..any way this gets called and our already won bet pushes?

Originally posted by Miavia

Damn...This ain't good....

if it gets PPD, then we push.

I checked the map and it honestly doesnt look like it should last very long..

iloseagain · 04-22-16, 10:41 PM

We back!

stevenash · 04-24-16, 11:32 AM

Mets under Braves 7.5 is my afternoon play.

Bear in mind deGrom is on a strict 85 pitch count, I don't think it matters here.
deGrom should limit Atlanta to 1 run in six or so innings.

Aaron Blair makes his MLB debut, had a solid minor league career, struck out 1 an inning, an usually (not always) first time starters in these spots have an edge over the batters.

2* under 7.5 total in that game.

HurlSweatPants · 04-24-16, 11:55 AM

Blair was on everyone's radar during trade discussions and the Braves wouldn't part with him so he must have a ton of upside. Agree with you on deGrom, he didn't look good before the child fiasco, his velocity on his fastball was down quite a bit, but I am not sure with this lineup it matters that much. Freeman has been struggling and the bottom of the order is awful. As long as he doesn't give Francouer first pitch fastballs, or fastballs period, this should be a low scoring game, I'm tailing you on this GL.

Francouer not in the lineup.

stevenash · 04-24-16, 02:37 PM

SD Padres +136 over St. Louis Cardinals

4:05 game.

No time for write up

I don't think Leake can out pitch Rea, and I personally think Rea keeps the Cards at bay all afternoon.

Like the home dogs at +136

2*

Jayvegas420 · 04-25-16, 08:00 AM

I get that last place teams are going to win a game every now and then but, against the st. Louis Cardinals? I have no faith in the San Diego Padres yet this year and even less faith in the Braves. The bottom of the Barrel in the National League looks terrible. One small blemish in a thread full of terrific pics can be overlooked just this once, but don't let it happen again Nash. LOL ..good luck

OckertCR · 04-25-16, 08:04 AM

Cards have been all or nothing so far this year.

They could score 11 or they could score 2

stevenash · 04-25-16, 08:06 AM

Originally posted by Jayvegas420

I get that last place teams are going to win a game every now and then but, against the st. Louis Cardinals? I have no faith in the San Diego Padres yet this year and even less faith in the Braves. The bottom of the Barrel in the National League looks terrible. One small blemish in a thread full of terrific pics can be overlooked just this once, but don't let it happen again Nash. LOL ..good luck

It was a spot play against Leake.
I had this bitch (not you, the game) when it was 5-3 until back to back solo shots.

I will take shots at live dogs all season when I'm up.
3 and 3 in my last six, we're fine.

GGGJR82 · 04-25-16, 08:18 AM

I loved the Padre's play yest, good money on home team against a sub par pitcher... 5-3 they were in the drivers seat but like you said, 2 solo shots were the dagger... Good play, just came up a bit short, but those are the plays that add to our bank roll's... I feel that way today about the Reds with Iglesias on the mound

stevenash · 04-25-16, 08:41 AM

White Sox bring up Miguel Gonzalez (former Oriole)
Blue Jays should hammer him, Gonzalez yields a home run + a game.

Was watching some of the Jays yesterday, when they weren't hitting them out, Donaldson and Bautista hit bombs that this morning I am still trying to figure out how those ball died at the warning track.

Very scary line up.

stevenash · 04-25-16, 08:51 AM

I think I have a live one here boys.

Oakland starts Graveman

DATE	OPPONENT	RESULT	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	GB	FB	Pit	BF	GSc	Dec.	Rel.	ERA
20-Apr	@ NYY	W 5-2	6.1	3	1	1	1	3	8	9	4	111	25	68	W(1-1)	-	2.04
12-Apr	vs LAA	L 5-4	6	4	1	1	0	2	3	11	7	98	23	61	-	-	2.38
7-Apr	vs CHW	L 6-1	5.1	3	2	2	1	1	4	12	5	84	22	57	L(0-1)	-	3.38
Monthly Totals			17.2	10	4	4	2	6	15	32	16	293	70	--	1-Jan	0 sv	2.04
			IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	GB	FB	Pit	BF	AGS	W-L	S-BS-H	ERA
Totals			17.2	10	4	4	2	6	15	32	16	293	70	62	1-Jan	0-0-0	2.04

Jordan Zimmerman does not scare me.

Oakland playing very good ball as of late.

A's 7 and 2 on the road, Graveman looks good so far, line is +156.
The only question is see i you can get 160 or lock it in at +156?

Jayvegas420 · 04-25-16, 09:34 AM

Alright, you changed my mind. Tailing on the Jays.
Was not aware that Sox were going with Gonzalez.
GL

stevenash · 04-25-16, 11:43 AM

Originally posted by stevenash

I think I have a live one here boys.

Oakland starts Graveman

DATE	OPPONENT	RESULT	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	GB	FB	Pit	BF	GSc	Dec.	Rel.	ERA
20-Apr	@ NYY	W 5-2	6.1	3	1	1	1	3	8	9	4	111	25	68	W(1-1)	-	2.04
12-Apr	vs LAA	L 5-4	6	4	1	1	0	2	3	11	7	98	23	61	-	-	2.38
7-Apr	vs CHW	L 6-1	5.1	3	2	2	1	1	4	12	5	84	22	57	L(0-1)	-	3.38
Monthly Totals			17.2	10	4	4	2	6	15	32	16	293	70	--	1-Jan	0 sv	2.04
			IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	GB	FB	Pit	BF	AGS	W-L	S-BS-H	ERA
Totals			17.2	10	4	4	2	6	15	32	16	293	70	62	1-Jan	0-0-0	2.04

Jordan Zimmerman does not scare me.

Oakland playing very good ball as of late.

A's 7 and 2 on the road, Graveman looks good so far, line is +156.
The only question is see i you can get 160 or lock it in at +156?

This is now

<small>Oakland Athletics at Detroit Tigers</small>
Mon 4/25	913 Oakland Athletics K Graveman - R	<input id="editx" name="S1_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altS1_30" name="altS1_30" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">+1½ -175</option><option value="1">+2½ -235</option><option value="2">-1½ +210</option><option value="3">-2½ +390</option><option value="4">+1 -123</option></select>	<input id="editx" name="M1_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> +130 Listed	<input id="editx" name="L1_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altL1_30" name="altL1_30" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">o8 -125</option><option value="1">o8½ -105</option><option value="2">o7½ -140</option><option value="3">o9 +120</option><option value="4">o7 -200</option></select>	<input id="editx" name="E1_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> o3½ -115	<input id="editx" name="E3_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> u3½ -105
7:05PM	914 Detroit Tigers J Zimmermann - R	<input id="editx" name="S2_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altS2_30" name="altS2_30" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">-1½ +155</option><option value="1">-2½ +195</option><option value="2">+1½ -250</option><option value="3">+2½ -490</option><option value="4">-1 +103</option></select>	<input id="editx" name="M2_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> -140 Listed	<input id="editx" name="L2_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altL2_30" name="altL2_30" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">u8 +105</option><option value="1">u8½ -115</option><option value="2">u7½ +120</option><option value="3">u9 -140</option><option value="4">u7 +170</option></select>	<input id="editx" name="E2_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> o4½ +110	<input id="editx" name="E4_30" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> u4½ -130

And this is what I locked it in for.

374265012-1

4/25/16 9:53am

$200.00

$316.00

Pending

4/25/16 7:05pm MLB Baseball 913 Oakland Athletics +158* <small style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">vs</small> Detroit Tigers (K Graveman - R must Start J Zimmermann - R must Start)

I think I beat the closing number by 10am.
Genius, pure genius! (no, I don't believe my own shit)

stevenash · 04-25-16, 11:47 AM

Originally posted by Jayvegas420

Alright, you changed my mind. Tailing on the Jays.
Was not aware that Sox were going with Gonzalez.
GL

Careful I'm not laying the -177, I was just pointing out Jays should hammer them.
I might use the Jays in a 2 team parlay though.

VegasPlayer · 04-25-16, 11:49 AM

Rain possible in Detroit early....

stevenash · 04-25-16, 12:21 PM

^
Just noticed that, good looking out.

SteezW · 04-25-16, 01:48 PM

Originally posted by stevenash

White Sox bring up Miguel Gonzalez (former Oriole)
Blue Jays should hammer him, Gonzalez yields a home run + a game.

Was watching some of the Jays yesterday, when they weren't hitting them out, Donaldson and Bautista hit bombs that this morning I am still trying to figure out how those ball died at the warning track.

Very scary line up.

Hey Nash

Good stuff here, I've been following along for a while.

The White Sox are not as good as their 13-6 record indicates and they score way less than Toronto. I like Blue Jays -1.5 +115

BOL

stevenash · 04-25-16, 02:44 PM

Originally posted by SteezW

Hey Nash

Good stuff here, I've been following along for a while.

The White Sox are not as good as their 13-6 record indicates and they score way less than Toronto. I like Blue Jays -1.5 +115

BOL

Yeah, like I mentioned on paper it looks like a blood bath in the makings.
My problem is laying the lumber, it goes against everything I believe in.
(first one that tells me you don't pay juice when you win gets five across the eye - lol)
I also don't like giving up an inning of at-bats and a run and a half, in other words I don't like betting home teams on run lines.
I might parlay Toronto with Bummy in SF tonight, but yeah, Stroman and the Jays look solid.

iloseagain · 04-25-16, 03:35 PM

Originally posted by stevenash

Yeah, like I mentioned on paper it looks like a blood bath in the makings.
My problem is laying the lumber, it goes against everything I believe in.
(first one that tells me you don't pay juice when you win gets five across the eye - lol)
I also don't like giving up an inning of at-bats and a run and a half, in other words I don't like betting home teams on run lines.
I might parlay Toronto with Bummy in SF tonight, but yeah, Stroman and the Jays look solid.

exactly what i did as well. GL

stevenash · 04-25-16, 03:57 PM

OK, in case you missed it, at 9:30 this morning I loved Oakland at +156, booked it at +158 (screen shot above)
I anticipated once handicappers started breaking things down they would see the same things I did and bet down Oakland.
Game sits now at +128.

I can scalp this game and make a profit, I would definitely scalp if I had 2 dimes on this game instead of 200, but I don't.
For those not familiar with the term scalp, it's also know as arb or arbitrage (taking advantage of price differences in two or more markets)

Oakland 2* at +158
be back later.

ThaWoj · 04-28-16, 05:52 PM

Where u at Nash, need a winner. Went big on cardinals/m's parlay last night and Iwaukama (sp?) shit the bed.

ThaWoj · 05-04-16, 11:03 AM

I hope some scumbag didnt run nash off like last year..we need u nash!!