Donald Trump To Run For President in 2016!!!!!!!!

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

Opposite. It's Trump Trump Trump so when someone calls they say Trump. But when it comes to the serious task of voting they are either not going to vote or will not vote for an unserious candidate.

I think Trump is pretty dang serious.

He could be making a hell of a lot more money making business deals right now.

Think about that one.

I think he truly loves our country and he hates seeing the path your current goon boy and evil regime have started!

[d2bets]

Trump's ad calling for a Mexico-US border wall shows the Spain/Morocco border instead.

WTF

Did he not know or did he intentionally misrepresent what was being shown?

[d2bets]

I think Trump is pretty dang serious.

He could be making a hell of a lot more money making business deals right now.

Think about that one.

I think he truly loves our country and he hates seeing the path your current goon boy and evil regime have started!

I think his egomaniacal narcissistic mind just loves being on TV and being talked about every day, good or bad. That's worth more to him than any amount of money can buy.

Think about that.

[DwightShrute]

Trump's ad calling for a Mexico-US border wall shows the Spain/Morocco border instead.

WTF

Did he not know or did he intentionally misrepresent what was being shown?

It was shown to show what can happen in the US by showing what happens in Spain/Morocco. No misrepresentation. You're grasping.

[dante1]

It was shown to show what can happen in the US by showing what happens in Spain/Morocco. No misrepresentation. You're grasping.

I finally figured out what this means after reading it 6 times.

No, you are grasping, just like his people are grasping. We are grasping, my god your guy makes statements that are outrageous and you claim we are grasping. lol

[DwightShrute]

I finally figured out what this means after reading it 6 times.

no one has ever accused you of being very bright.

[dante1]

I think his egomaniacal narcissistic mind just loves being on TV and being talked about every day, good or bad. That's worth more to him than any amount of money can buy.

Think about that.

Well yeah, I think everybody realizes this, except for his followers. Listen D2 this I believe is all irrelevant because I still think he doesn't win the r nomination. I hope he does, I really hope he does. If I could vote for him I would. I think I am going to be disappointed. But..

There is no way ever that a majority of Americans will vote for this clown in a national election. I mean even in real time he loses to H. Just imagine how bad that margin will become when he must debate her. He has no debating skills, he doesn't know the issues, he will simply talk about bs and she will be rattling off facts and answers. It will be disastrous for the R party

[d2bets]

Does Trump still think the exonerated Central Park 5 are guilty? He wanted them executed before a trial and ran an ad for it. Now we know they were innocent. Did he apologize? Of course not. I mean, they're black, of course they were guilty.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/23/nyregion/trump-draws-criticism-for-ad-he-ran-after-jogger-attack.html

[dante1]

no one has ever accused you of being very bright.

omg, well maybe we should have another discussion. you know the kind where you don't show up, or the kind where you answer with dancing men. should we start. I can ask a question about oh anything you posted in the past couple days. How about we discuss that article in THE ATLANTIC, the one you said was excellent. you see I really read it, twice. you did not.

lol

[DwightShrute]

omg, well maybe we should have another discussion. you know the kind where you don't show up, or the kind where you answer with dancing men. should we start. I can ask a question about oh anything you posted in the past couple days. How about we discuss that article in THE ATLANTIC, the one you said was excellent. you see I really read it, twice. you did not.

lol

no need. You have the conservation all by yourself. You speak for me and you like always. You have little to no people skills and that's why you have no credibility. Being dishonest is a whole other matter.

It is funny how much you are bothered when I give a couple of betpoints to someone. Like clockwork

[dante1]

dwight, when you start to know what you are talking about I will allow you some peace. when you back up your pastes and your bs with actual facts I will give you some peace. but when you are critical of a man who was awarded a noble prize in economics and you haven't one clue what econ is about well then you are fair game. you are critical of P Krugman but when I asked you two very elementary questions about economics you had no answer. you answered with little dancing men. remember that? You know if you are critical of P Krugman you should at least know what the study of econ means. you need not be an expert but have some fckin idea. Not be against a man simply because you think you should be.

so when you know wtf you are talking about you get peace from me. simple as that. and concerning your two points, I just think it is hilarious because often you give points to people who are on the opposite side of the fence.

remember when you pasted an article that was about the validity of climate change. but you were arguing the opposite. so I read your post and I am thinking wtf this article is pro climate change. I asked you wtf. Your answer was "you thought it was interesting" lol you posted an article against your argument and your excuse was "it was interesting", no you didn't read it. and that is the shit you do all the time, you find something and don't even read it and paste it. stop that shit and you get rid of me. very simple.

[DwightShrute]

dwight, when you start to know what you are talking about I will allow you some peace. when you back up your pastes and your bs with actual facts I will give you some peace. but when you are critical of a man who was awarded a noble prize in economics and you haven't one clue what econ is about well then you are fair game. you are critical of P Krugman but when I asked you two very elementary questions about economics you had no answer. you answered with little dancing men. remember that? You know if you are critical of P Krugman you should at least know what the study of econ means. you need not be an expert but have some fckin idea. Not be against a man simply because you think you should be.

so when you know wtf you are talking about you get peace from me. simple as that. and concerning your two points, I just think it is hilarious because often you give points to people who are on the opposite side of the fence.

remember when you pasted an article that was about the validity of climate change. but you were arguing the opposite. so I read your post and I am thinking wtf this article is pro climate change. I asked you wtf. Your answer was "you thought it was interesting" lol you posted an article against your argument and your excuse was "it was interesting", no you didn't read it. and that is the shit you do all the time, you find something and don't even read it and paste it. stop that shit and you get rid of me. very simple.

no people skills whatsoever. It's quite sad to watch.

[dante1]

no people skills whatsoever. It's quite sad to watch.

see this is what you and your buddies do when you have no answer. you do it all the time. here is some people skills for you. I promise when you know wtf you are talking about I will stop busting your balls. That means when you argue a point make sure you didn't argue the opposite point at one time. That means when you are critical of a person, place, thing or idea have at least a little knowledge of what you are arguing against. When you claim that an article is excellent, actually read it. That article in the Atlantic was not a bad article. I read it twice. But, you did not.

so how are those people skills, fair enough for you? Know what you are talking about and I will give you peace. My gosh I might even agree with something you have to say if you back it up with some real facts. I know facts and guys like you don't get along. That brings to mind a very good example. Politifact, they are valid dwight. Everybody knows they are valid. Deep in your brain you know it too. Admit to facts, that is all I ask. Admit to facts and know the facts and we will get along like best buddies.

[brooks85]

Well yeah, I think everybody realizes this, except for his followers. Listen D2 this I believe is all irrelevant because I still think he doesn't win the r nomination. I hope he does, I really hope he does. If I could vote for him I would. I think I am going to be disappointed. But..

There is no way ever that a majority of Americans will vote for this clown in a national election. I mean even in real time he loses to H. Just imagine how bad that margin will become when he must debate her. He has no debating skills, he doesn't know the issues, he will simply talk about bs and she will be rattling off facts and answers. It will be disastrous for the R party

[dante1]

well I clicked on this site thinking maybe Brooks has something of value to add. I was disappointed again. Listen brooks, why don't you for once, just once address an issue. My god your buddy Dwight at least addresses issues. He does, you do not. I have yet to read anything from you that wasn't an attack or a stupid paste like the above.

I am looking forward to a reply that says something. I guess I will get Jeopardy.

[TheMoneyShot]

All politicians lie to become president.

Obama con'd you to vote for him and it worked.

You wanted CHANGE.. you got it.

Anyone is better than this a$$hole


I'll take TRUMPS HYPED UP TALK any day.

[DwightShrute]

see this is what you and your buddies do when you have no answer. you do it all the time. here is some people skills for you. I promise when you know wtf you are talking about I will stop busting your balls. That means when you argue a point make sure you didn't argue the opposite point at one time. That means when you are critical of a person, place, thing or idea have at least a little knowledge of what you are arguing against. When you claim that an article is excellent, actually read it. That article in the Atlantic was not a bad article. I read it twice. But, you did not.

so how are those people skills, fair enough for you? Know what you are talking about and I will give you peace. My gosh I might even agree with something you have to say if you back it up with some real facts. I know facts and guys like you don't get along. That brings to mind a very good example. Politifact, they are valid dwight. Everybody knows they are valid. Deep in your brain you know it too. Admit to facts, that is all I ask. Admit to facts and know the facts and we will get along like best buddies.

lol. Case and point. You are untrustworthy and that is why I rarely engage in a back and forth on a particular topic. Yes I sometimes give in after repeated begging by you. The last time was when I answered the question about going back in time. Of course, after I did then you did your usual name calling. That is why you are dishonest dante and that is why I don't answer your questions. That's why you lack credibility.

You just haven't been able to show the ability to have a mature debate without name calling. Not with me anyways. You rather continue with your dishonest attacks by bringing up things I said about climate change (which you once again keep mentioning years later and still pretend you can read my mind) for example.

So go ahead. Make up some more shit about what I was thinking about in a post I made years ago, mentioning me in nearly every post you make and keep playing your games. Or grow up. You have the ability to choose.\

Oh and politifact aren't. It's been proven by many. So that is just another lie you will keep on spewing until your last dying breathe.

[JIBBBY]

Way to go Jimmy He was a shitty president but I commend him for doing this..

[DwightShrute]

she's right

[DwightShrute]

Donald Trump dominates in first national poll of 2016

WASHEX.AM

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

Go trump go win and build the wall and kick out all the fukking illegal pieces of shit who don't pay their taxes and fine their asshole employers big time!

[brooks85]

well I clicked on this site thinking maybe Brooks has something of value to add. I was disappointed again. Listen brooks, why don't you for once, just once address an issue. My god your buddy Dwight at least addresses issues. He does, you do not. I have yet to read anything from you that wasn't an attack or a stupid paste like the above.

I am looking forward to a reply that says something. I guess I will get Jeopardy.

until you answer the question, you asked in the first place, that is correct.

[DwightShrute]

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

dante1 is obviously a DEMONAZEVILFUKKEDUPCRAPPY worthless piece of shit . He lies so much like Hitlary, pussy lipstick on a pig goon boy con and fraud, Dingy Harry Reid that he can't keep track of all his fukking lies!

[khicks26]

dante1 is obviously a DEMONAZEVILFUKKEDUPCRAPPY worthless piece of shit . He lies so much like Hitlary, pussy lipstick on a pig goon boy con and fraud, Dingy Harry Reid that he can't keep track of all his fukking lies!BALL HAIR

lol

[dante1]

dante1 is obviously a DEMONAZEVILFUKKEDUPCRAPPY worthless piece of shit . He lies so much like Hitlary, pussy lipstick on a pig goon boy con and fraud, Dingy Harry Reid that he can't keep track of all his fukking lies!

would you please repeat this, I can't quite make it out.

[dante1]

lol. Case and point. You are untrustworthy and that is why I rarely engage in a back and forth on a particular topic. Yes I sometimes give in after repeated begging by you. The last time was when I answered the question about going back in time. Of course, after I did then you did your usual name calling. That is why you are dishonest dante and that is why I don't answer your questions. That's why you lack credibility.

You just haven't been able to show the ability to have a mature debate without name calling. Not with me anyways. You rather continue with your dishonest attacks by bringing up things I said about climate change (which you once again keep mentioning years later and still pretend you can read my mind) for example.

So go ahead. Make up some more shit about what I was thinking about in a post I made years ago, mentioning me in nearly every post you make and keep playing your games. Or grow up. You have the ability to choose.\

Oh and politifact aren't. It's been proven by many. So that is just another lie you will keep on spewing until your last dying breathe.

no black heart you don't engage with me because every time you have you got destroyed, you refuse to answer questions because you believe you will be tricked. no black heart you don't engage because you are terrified, much like your two buddies and your twin.

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

Take your meds instead of illegal drugs you fukking moron dante1 !!

[darrell74]

Whoops is what they call it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6d_YKFO_20

Neat little video

At 1:16, little lady said that she would "Eat her hand" if Trump wins GOP.
She should get a lot of flak for it.

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

Whoops is what they call it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6d_YKFO_20

Neat little video

At 1:16, little lady said that she would "Eat her hand" if Trump wins GOP.
She should get a lot of flak for it.

Yes sir she sure should!

[DwightShrute]

Whoops is what they call it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6d_YKFO_20

Neat little video

At 1:16, little lady said that she would "Eat her hand" if Trump wins GOP.
She should get a lot of flak for it.

good video. I really like this guy Trump more and more. I hope he becomes the potus.

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

I totally agree 300% Dwight.

I just saw him speaking on Hannity!

[Jayvegas420]

You are untrustworthy and that is why I rarely engage in a back and forth on a particular topic. Yes I sometimes give in after repeated begging by you. The last time was when I answered the question about going back in time. Of course, after I did then you did your usual name calling. That is why you are dishonest dante and that is why I don't answer your questions. That's why you lack credibility.

You just haven't been able to show the ability to have a mature debate without name calling. Not with me anyways. You rather continue with your dishonest attacks by bringing up things I said about climate change (which you once again keep mentioning years later and still pretend you can read my mind) for example.

So go ahead. Make up some more shit about what I was thinking about in a post I made years ago, mentioning me in nearly every post you make and keep playing your games. Or grow up. You have the ability to choose.\

Oh and politifact aren't. It's been proven by many. So that is just another lie you will keep on spewing until your last dying breathe.[/QUOTE]

It's casing point you dummy!

[Jayvegas420]

too drunk to quote properly but my point is still the same its casing point you illiterate fuc. by the way I still love you Dwihite

[DwightShrute]

[IMG]https://****************************/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/12509080_1541698312817100_17118986710583 08840_n.jpg?oh=b727fb63acf29f2c8812b69c8 9ec8ea9&oe=56FC50D9[/IMG]