Would be interesting to look at the last few year's best and worst teams to bet on the money line.
In theory, teams like the Nationals or Pirates would be profitable to blindly bet all season long, because prices they get as dogs would be so inflated because no one wants to touch them with a 10 foot poll.
Meanwhile, teams like Boston and New York always require more chalk then they actually should. I know some people believe in blindly fading the Yanks all year...
That is just in theory though. Anyone have any numbers on the matter?
In theory, teams like the Nationals or Pirates would be profitable to blindly bet all season long, because prices they get as dogs would be so inflated because no one wants to touch them with a 10 foot poll.
Meanwhile, teams like Boston and New York always require more chalk then they actually should. I know some people believe in blindly fading the Yanks all year...
That is just in theory though. Anyone have any numbers on the matter?