Originally posted by brooks85
dallas cowboys @ Green Bay Packers thread
Collapse
X
-
boeing powerSBR Hall of Famer
- 03-23-10
- 9698
#211Read the rules you dumb fukin redneck.Comment -
BusteduSBR Sharp
- 10-02-10
- 291
#212the ball never hit the ground!!!!Originally posted by d2betsYep. I read that, but I still disagree. I believe he caught it first. And then he went down to the ground and lost it as lunging forward after elbow was down.Comment -
Gonz312SBR MVP
- 01-22-11
- 1467
#213In the words of cowboys fans...I think you are all are missing the point, they only managed 7 (3)pts in the second half...you cant complain about calls when you only score 7 (3)pts in a half.
Just had to replace one low number for another.Comment -
EaglesPhan36SBR Aristocracy
- 12-06-06
- 71662
#214Yep.Originally posted by packerd_00Did you read what the Lions tweetedComment -
EaglesPhan36SBR Aristocracy
- 12-06-06
- 71662
#215It's the definition of ironic. It's the exact argument they made last week with Detroit losing. That one call didn't make or break that game. Well when it happens to your team - umm, that one call makes a difference, doesn't it? I am going to enjoy listening to the suicide hotline that will be DFW sports radio tomorrow morning.Originally posted by Gonz312In the words of cowboys fans...I think you are all are missing the point, they only managed 7 (3)pts in the second half...you cant complain about calls when you only score 7 (3)pts in a half.
Just had to replace one low number for another.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82667
#216The line judge who was 2 feet from the ball called it a catch which is what the human eye can see in actual speed. The reversal was by the referee who saw everything from multiple angles and in slow motion frame by frame and made a judgment call (or what some conspirasists think what Roger Goodell told the ref to call).Originally posted by Rollins08One thing nobody has mentioned is that the call on the field was a catch. The video has to show 100% that it wasn't a catch to overturn. I'm not sure how it was reversed. I think however it was called on the field should have standed.Comment -
opie1988SBR Posting Legend
- 09-12-10
- 23429
#217Did you see Jason Garrett after the game? He said numerous times that this game wasn't decided by officiating. And it wasn't.Originally posted by EaglesPhan36It's the definition of ironic. It's the exact argument they made last week with Detroit losing. That one call didn't make or break that game. Well when it happens to your team - umm, that one call makes a difference, doesn't it? I am going to enjoy listening to the suicide hotline that will be DFW sports radio tomorrow morning.
That seemed like an absolute catch. But the rule is subjective. It's a stupid rule, but it's in there.
Great season by Dallas. Fun to cheer for them this year.
Love them or hate them....NFL playoffs are better when Cowboys are in it.Comment -
yankees10SBR Wise Guy
- 06-27-10
- 973
#218Can someone explain the challenge rule to me I thought once you lost the first one you was out of challenges ?Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17846
#219At the end of the day the Lions are stuck with Stafford,he was not going to beat Rodgers,and he damn sure wasn't going to beat Seattle,that Seahawk secondary would have eaten him alive.Originally posted by Booya711What's funny to me is how people get so mad about THEIR team losing. The only thing that matters is if you were on the right side with the money.
Lions fans - how would your lives have been different if they had beat Dallas? NO FUKKING different.
Cowboy fans - how would your lives have been different if they had beat the packers? NO FUKKING different
My point is lions and cowboy backers were both winners with the $$$$$Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17846
#220Your a good sport man.Originally posted by opie1988Did you see Jason Garrett after the game? He said numerous times that this game wasn't decided by officiating. And it wasn't.
That seemed like an absolute catch. But the rule is subjective. It's a stupid rule, but it's in there.
Great season by Dallas. Fun to cheer for them this year.
Love them or hate them....NFL playoffs are better when Cowboys are in it.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82667
#2212 max challenges you can lose. If you win the first one you get 2 more.Originally posted by yankees10Can someone explain the challenge rule to me I thought once you lost the first one you was out of challenges ?Comment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#222since when is that the rule?? you have to maintain possession all the way to the ground!Originally posted by KermitIn my opinion the act of him catching the pass with control of the ball had already been established.Comment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#223nanana nanana hey hey goodbyeOriginally posted by opie1988Did you see Jason Garrett after the game? He said numerous times that this game wasn't decided by officiating. And it wasn't.
That seemed like an absolute catch. But the rule is subjective. It's a stupid rule, but it's in there.
Great season by Dallas. Fun to cheer for them this year.
Love them or hate them....NFL playoffs are better when Cowboys are in it.
Comment -
yankees10SBR Wise Guy
- 06-27-10
- 973
#224Ok so the first one that they won that they should've lost is actually the one that cost them the game ?Originally posted by pavyracer2 max challenges you can lose. If you win the first one you get 2 more.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82667
#225I don't know. I'm just saying that if GB coach lost his first challenge earlier in the game and he had a timeout when Dez Bryant made the catch he could challenge again which he did.Originally posted by yankees10Ok so the first one that they won that they should've lost is actually the one that cost them the game ?Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#226Not if he had the ball long enough to make a football move. Looking in slow-mo it looks like Bryant:Originally posted by iloveladysince when is that the rule?? you have to maintain possession all the way to the ground!
(a) catches it with clear possession at about the 5.5 yard line; then
(b) left foot down at the 5; then
(c) right foot down at the 4; then
(d) left foot touches down again at the 3; then
(e) a stretchout covering 2.5 yards; then
(f) elbow/forearm down at the .5 yard line; then
(g) with an outstretched left arm the ball contacts the ground causing the ball to come loose at the 0.25 yard line.
This rule of maintaining possession is supposed to apply on dive catches and catches where the player jumps and falls down where the catch must be maintained. I don't see how process of the catch can cover 5 yards on a clean initial catch. That's just not correct.
They got it wrong.Comment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#227Originally posted by Busteduthe ball never hit the ground!!!!

and i bet you think there wasnt contact on the pi in the lions game too. the ball popped up not because it hit the ground but because the packers greased it up
Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#228Originally posted by lakerboySea should be favored by 7. Canbt see how gb will protect Rodgers and stop lynch.
FL Football - Sun 1/18 Game Handicap Money Line Total Points More Sun 1/18 301 Green Bay Packers +7 -112 +260 Over 47 -105 12:05 PM 302 Seattle Seahawks -7 +102 -295 Under 47 -105 Comment -
yankees10SBR Wise Guy
- 06-27-10
- 973
#229Right but he won the first one lost the second but should've lost the first one because that ball hit the ground so therefore should've been out of challenges when that reception occurred thus not being able to challenge it so therefore the first challenge that clearly hit the ground is what actually cost Dallas the game or the lead at least who knows what would've happened after thatOriginally posted by pavyracerI don't know. I'm just saying that if GB coach lost his first challenge earlier in the game and he had a timeout when Dez Bryant made the catch he could challenge again which he did.Comment -
tony_comeSBR Posting Legend
- 03-31-10
- 21695
#230Next gameComment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#231geniusssssssOriginally posted by lakerboyFL Football - Sun 1/18 Game Handicap Money Line Total Points More Sun 1/18 301 Green Bay Packers +7 -112 +260 Over 47 -105 12:05 PM 302 Seattle Seahawks -7 +102 -295 Under 47 -105
Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#232you have 258 posts. this is the last time i will recognize you. you are a nothing here or anywhere else in life.Originally posted by iloveladygeniusssssss
Comment -
Rollins08SBR MVP- 04-20-07
- 1337
#233I'm not saying it was the wrong call. I'm just saying I don't know how it was 100% conclusive. It looked very close to me although I would say it probably wasn't a catch I don't think it should have been overturned.Originally posted by pavyracerThe line judge who was 2 feet from the ball called it a catch which is what the human eye can see in actual speed. The reversal was by the referee who saw everything from multiple angles and in slow motion frame by frame and made a judgment call (or what some conspirasists think what Roger Goodell told the ref to call).Comment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#234isnt that want you want? to be recognized as a genius?? i hate attention whores and you are at the top of thatOriginally posted by lakerboyyou have 258 posts. this is the last time i will recognize you. you are a nothing here or anywhere else in life.
Comment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#235you dumb fuk. you dont have to quote your own posts. we all saw what you wrote.Originally posted by lakerboyyou have 258 posts. this is the last time i will recognize you. you are a nothing here or anywhere else in life.
pat yourself on the back loser
Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82667
#236I think if the TD was scored at that point and Cowboys went up by a point or 2 the Packers would have drove down for the winning FG because the Cowboys defense was finished. So the final score would have been 29-28 Packers.Originally posted by yankees10Right but he won the first one lost the second but should've lost the first one because that ball hit the ground so therefore should've been out of challenges when that reception occurred thus not being able to challenge it so therefore the first challenge that clearly hit the ground is what actually cost Dallas the game or the lead at least who knows what would've happened after thatComment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#237if you can name 1 person that respects you on this forum I will quit posting right now and they have to agree. wizzle doesnt count because thats youOriginally posted by lakerboyyou have 258 posts. this is the last time i will recognize you. you are a nothing here or anywhere else in life.
Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#238You might very well be right. Too bad we won't know. That would have been more exciting. I feel robbed. THey would have led by either 1 or 3, not 2.Originally posted by pavyracerI think if the TD was scored at that point and Cowboys went up by a point or 2 the Packers would have drove down for the winning FG because the Cowboys defense was finished. So the final score would have been 29-28 Packers.Comment -
opie1988SBR Posting Legend
- 09-12-10
- 23429
#239I respect him.Originally posted by iloveladyif you can name 1 person that respects you on this forum I will quit posting right now and they have to agree. wizzle doesnt count because thats you
Now let's see if you're a man of your word???
Adios, dumbfukk.Comment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#240no problem. show me a post where you reply to one of his threads with kind words and im doneOriginally posted by opie1988I respect him.
Now let's see if you're a man of your word???
Adios, dumbfukk.Comment -
The KrakenBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-25-11
- 29085
#241I got mad respect for LB
now gtfo.
oh, now I see you're trying to qualify your statement
LB >>>>> your sorry assComment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#242lmao thats good enough. im rolling to covers where its not just a bunch of dumb penetrates like lb and wizzle. anybody that respects lakers should kill themselves. never seen such a loser in all my lifeOriginally posted by The KrakenI got mad respect for LB
now gtfo
Comment -
The KrakenBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-25-11
- 29085
#243See yah
BitchComment -
iloveladySBR Sharp
- 12-16-14
- 324
#244suck a d@ckOriginally posted by The KrakenSee yah
BitchComment -
opie1988SBR Posting Legend
- 09-12-10
- 23429
#245Ok, whatever.Originally posted by iloveladylmao thats good enough. im rolling to covers where its not just a bunch of dumb penetrates like lb and wizzle. anybody that respects lakers should kill themselves. never seen such a loser in all my life
Again....Adios, motherfukker.
Don't let me see your dumbass around here again.
Next time I won't be nearly as welcoming.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
