Don't we have to take Nats (+109) at Cincy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • STAX
    SBR MVP
    • 11-01-13
    • 3718

    #1
    Don't we have to take Nats (+109) at Cincy?
    Gio vrs Cueto, Reds bottom 5 team in the MLBs right now, but are at home... I think getting +anything here is great...not quite a believer the Nats have what it takes to win it all, but Im almost there... starting to think the Nats give the Dodgers the best run at the NL pennant.

    I dont think you can go wrong in putting equal bets on the Dodgers and Nats futures to win the NL pennant... Im guessing Dodgers +300 and Nats +600... total guess...

    Can anyone fill me in on the Nats rotation and starter records/ERA's

    Will throw a few points to someone for the trouble if i go on a mini run betting Washington...

    Putting $300 on this game at +109
  • kidcudi92
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 12-14-11
    • 15437

    #2
    Not in order but this is their current 5

    Gio Gonzalez - 6-5 3.74 era
    Strasburg - 7-8 3.67 era
    Tanner Roark - 10-6 2.82 era
    Doug Fister - 9-2 2.92 era
    Jordan Zimmermann - 6-5 3.20 era
    Comment
    • jjgold
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 07-20-05
      • 388208

      #3
      Washington is definitely starting to heat up and Stroudsburg is one of their worst pitchers go figure

      I can never call the Washington games correctly so I might tell here
      Comment
      • Big Bear
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 11-01-11
        • 43253

        #4
        much better games on the board.
        Comment
        Search
        Collapse
        SBR Contests
        Collapse
        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
        Collapse
        Working...