NSFW: For all of those who are bitching about RS getting banned...

[AgainstAllOdds]

Here is the pic.

http://www.alexbucks.com/gal/ab/lucas_dale/lucas_dale_014.jpg

Please dont post it on the forum but the main question is, Do you really think this is not inappropriate?


mods - just trying to prove a point here to the people whining about RS getting the ban and they never saw the pic.

[RogueJuror]

Its a marked site, copyrighted and all, with CC processors. 100% sure that site can get the 18 U.S.C. Section 2257 and 28 C.F.R. Part 75 documentation if need be.

[Bread]

No, really!!

[AgainstAllOdds]

Rogue thats all good and dandy but 1. (By the looks of that pic) that site is probably where a bunch of sick pedophiles hang out at AND 2. Do you really think its alright to post at a gambling forum given the circumstances? He could of chose something less "underage looking" and It would of been okay but the point is, he tried to push the envelope yet again and this time got burned (after he was already warned in the past about that "almost underage" shit).

[pavyracer]

I went to that site. If you click on the links at the bottom there is a picture of fully naked young men/boys in a bathtub. I think this is disgusting. RogueScholar pushed the buttons to the extreme this time and some steps need to be taken before SBR becomes a gay hornets nest.

[wtf]

No, really!!

u hard bread?

[Casi]

Yeah it is disgusting, i hope he won´t be allowed back.

[AgainstAllOdds]

whats NSFW mean? I didnt put that in my title...

[WileOut]

This should have been done a long time ago. Who wants to look at naked men in every other thread here? His avatars had me coming here less and less.

[durito]

Who is RS?

[pavyracer]

Who is RS?

RogueScholar

[RogueJuror]

u hard bread?

a different kind of hard lol

[tacomax]

AAO - I can't get the link to work. Can you go somewhere like http://www.imageshack.us/ and post the picture in the forum for me? Much appreciated.

[RogueJuror]

whats NSFW mean? I didnt put that in my title...

Not Safe For Work

[AgainstAllOdds]

Not Safe For Work

Oh, Smart label.

[smitch124]

I'm appalled by the unsharpened pencils...

[AgainstAllOdds]

AAO - I can't get the link to work. Can you go somewhere like http://www.imageshack.us/ and post the picture in the forum for me? Much appreciated.

Sorry...I would but I am not saving that garbage to my comp (in order to upload).However, Others are more than welcome.

[smarmy]

Rogue thats all good and dandy but 1. (By the looks of that pic) that site is probably where a bunch of sick pedophiles hang out at AND 2. Do you really think its alright to post at a gambling forum given the circumstances? He could of chose something less "underage looking" and It would of been okay but the point is, he tried to push the envelope yet again and this time got burned (after he was already warned in the past about that "almost underage" shit).

You're just mad that Rougy made an example out of you and all your boys turned on you. And what the hell is "almost underage". It is or it isn't.

[SexyMit]

Yeah I thought it was disgusting also. I was going to go to another site cause I thought this was getting a little ridiculous all this gay shit.

[AgainstAllOdds]

You're just mad that Rougy made an example out of you and all your boys turned on you. And what the hell is "almost underage". It is or it isn't.

You are probably the type of person who visits these underage looking sites all the time.

[blittydeuce]

Is that patty and onthewhat in the picture?

[smarmy]

You are probably the type of person who visits these underage looking sites all the time.

No. Not at all. You're the one with the link to the picture. Why are you hanging on to that?

[AgainstAllOdds]

No. Not at all. You're the one with the link to the picture. Why are you hanging on to that?

Actually, I was in chat last night when RS was posting the pic. Today I searched through my internet history and found the link to the site.

Nice try though.

[Mudcat]

If we are going to have rules against posting perfectly legal pics that happen to make individual posters' imaginations run wild, I would like Dozer's Fire Marshall Bill avatar removed. It gives me dry-mouth and I find that quite unpleasant.

[smarmy]

Actually, I was in chat last night when RS was posting the pic. Today I searched through my internet history and found the link to the site.

Nice try though.

Wasn't trying. Just stating an observation.

I stand by my original statement. I think that you're just pissed that Rougy used you as the subject of his making a point and a good number of your 'friends' turned on you in record time believing that you were a stiff. I know that if it was me, I would be pissed. But, I think that's your deal.

[pavyracer]

Since when using a fellow poster in a fallacious way to spill dirt to his name is considered as making a point to advance your homophilic agendas?

[smarmy]

Since when using a fellow poster in a fallacious way to spill dirt to his name is considered as making a point to advance your homophilic agendas?

uhm...no.

My point was that AAO's problem wasn't with the content as much as it was with Rouge because he dragged AAO's name through the dirt and almost everyone jumped on the bandwagon and buried AAO in about 5 minutes. Not quite sure how this was a 'homophilic agenda', but some of you guys need to lighten up just a tad and learn how to turn a blind eye to something that you find distateful instead of jumping on your soapbox and whining about it.

[pavyracer]

RogueScholar was testing SBR's tolerance with the AAO spill dirt thread. When he saw he wasn't punished he upped the ante and tried testing them with introducing his actual agenda which is to promote underage homosexual boy sex. I think SBR did the right thing to put an end to this kind of behavior. Underage homosexual sex amongst boys should not be tolerated at a place where straight family men gather with their children. My children are playing around when I post at SBR.

[big joe 1212]

What a sick fuk!

[smarmy]

When he saw he wasn't punished he upped the ante and tried testing them with introducing his actual agenda which is to promote underage homosexual boy sex.

Really? He has an actual agenda to promote underage homosexual boy sex? How about overage homosexual man sex? or women sex? is that OK? Because I see alot of that here. Will there be complaining about that? Nah.

Is it appropriate for this site? Absolutely not, but I just think some of you guys put far too much thought into this and I think that he does it just to get a rise out of you.

IMO.

[pavyracer]

Some people read SBR at work or at home when they are around their children. How do I explain to my boss or my kids that a grown man has as an avatar of 2 underage boys naked doing a sexual act? Most people are upset with the avatars and not on RogueScholar's character. And if he is doing it to piss people off as a joke it's not right either.

What would you do if someone starts acting like a terrorist making rude comments about people in the military that lost loved ones just to push some buttons? Where does is stop then if we allow this?

[smarmy]

Some people read SBR at work or at home when they are around their children. How do I explain to my boss or my kids that a grown man has as an avatar of 2 underage boys naked doing a sexual act? Most people are upset with the avatars and not on RogueScholar's character. And if he is doing it to piss people off as a joke it's not right either.

What would you do if someone starts acting like a terrorist making rude comments about people in the military that lost loved ones just to push some buttons? Where does is stop then if we allow this?

Isn't there a setting to ignore people or block avatars? Seems like an easy fix to me. And comparing this to the other is apples and oranges. Where does it stop? Wherever SBR says it does. I never said that he was right, I just said that AAO was just mad because of the 'fib' that RS told everyone. Then you jumped saying he had an agenda, and well, I just had to jump on that.

[curious]

RogueScholar also has an agenda of promoting gang rape of the wives of disabled SBR posters. RS and several of the SBR man boy love association charter members threatened to rape my wife if we come to the bash. So, I guess RS has more than one sexually deviant agendas on SBR.

RS is a menace and needs to be banned permanently.

[Sforz]

Curious,

something is wrong with you. You make shit up, and not in a funny JJ way, in a disturbing- no one likes you way. Why don't you go back across the street and stay there.

[sickler]

<br>