onner, you made a big mistake............

[MonkeyF0cker]

'

wtf,

i swear i have not seen a guy as angry as this guy in many yrs.. you'd think he'd be a happy guy living the life in vegas with his 2$ poker hands and all and making 40 bucks a week to pay for his 1 room apt, but he's so bitter. why.. i have no idea...

i think because it breaks his heart knowing he always wanted to be a wise guy and will have to settle for a wannabe only.. he doesn't have what it takes, wtf.. he's a know it all punk..

monkey, go take a long walk on a short pier.

If you haven't noticed, Nicky, I don't give a fvck what people think about me here. I only care that they get the right information. Whatever lies you need to make up about me in that pea-sized fvckin brain of yours to make you feel better about yourself doesn't bother me. And it certainly doesn't make you right. Once again.

[reno cool]

No shit. The idea that only unders are ever good bets is absurd. I'm convinced Nicky is stuck in the 80s when you could blind bet decent sized dogs and probably blindly bet unders and profit.

Don't believe anybody made this claim.

The idea is simply that unders as a whole are better than overs, and combined with line shopping is better than a random approach, and possibly a winning one. Although this may be nothing an expert handicapper would use, to the number of borderline hopeless bettors this could be a significant improvement. For that he deserves credit.

[tacomax]

I don't think that Nicky is very intelligent.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Don't believe anybody made this claim.

The idea is simply that unders as a whole are better than overs, and combined with line shopping is better than a random approach, and possibly a winning one. Although this may be nothing an expert handicapper would use, to the number of borderline hopeless bettors this could be a significant improvement. For that he deserves credit.

Well, he started the thread stating that OTW would be up 11 units by betting the unders on the entirety of the board, regardless of price. I would argue that it is worse to give the impression that posters will make money doing this, when in the meanwhile, they are unknowingly making negative expectation wagers.

[Tsoprano]

Nicky is a sharp

[MonkeyF0cker]

Nope.

[tacomax]

Nicky is as sharp as Tsoprano. Fact.

[Tsoprano]

hilarious