Originally posted by Kaabee
Pats vs Carolina IN GAME THREAD
Collapse
X
-
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#141More like excuses for a bad call. Refs always cover up for each other. You cant say that he couldn't come back to the ball but for the interference. Just a bad call.Comment -
Tommy KarateSBR Posting Legend
- 10-12-13
- 13445
#142haha.....i love clowns like you. you always talk square this, square that.Originally posted by Patrickz0rsSquares get buried on the Pats. Love it!
look in the mirror pal....YOU are the public...Comment -
RubberKettleSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-28-09
- 6421
#143That oldman made no sense contact after 5 yds is a penalty anywayOriginally posted by Kaabeegerry austin explained it well.Comment -
ThaTopMoronBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 04-30-10
- 27023
#144I always jinx Brady when I bet on him
lol oh wellComment -
thetrinitySBR Posting Legend
- 01-25-11
- 22444
#145it wasnt interference. idiot ref throws the flag and now itll be mired in controversyComment -
Mac4LyfeSBR Aristocracy
- 01-04-09
- 48806
#146ESPN real late on the mute button. You could hear Brady scream "what the fukkk" loud as hell.Comment -
cmoney11SBR Wise Guy
- 09-22-13
- 773
#147We can all send a back of sh!t to Ridley's doorComment -
KaabeeSBR MVP
- 01-21-06
- 2482
#148ball was in the air. can't call illegal contact.Originally posted by RubberKettleThat oldman made no sense contact after 5 yds is a penalty anywayComment -
Bigh2001SBR Sharp
- 10-18-11
- 346
#149Well all you fags who had the pats can eat it. penetrate BradyComment -
gcd8SBR Wise Guy
- 03-29-13
- 986
#150so defensive holding isn't called on last play of games just every time elseComment -
Cuse0323BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-09-09
- 30169
#151It really wasn't PI but Pats backers and conspiracy nuts will be out in full force.Comment -
onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 36572
#152Time delay must of been off, because I don't think I even heard them try to bleep it.Originally posted by Mac4LyfeESPN real late on the mute button. You could hear Brady scream "what the fukkk" loud as hell.
Comment -
tokioSBR MVP
- 03-30-10
- 2150
#153Quite an ending. Heard some cussing on National TV by Brady lol.Comment -
CDMKMPSBR Wise Guy
- 10-18-12
- 774
#154So funny to see how obviously biased people get when they lose money.
Explain how that pass was catchable for Gronk regardless of what the back defender does to him
Was he gonna disappear like nightcrawler and reappear in front of the guy who picked it?Comment -
Mac4LyfeSBR Aristocracy
- 01-04-09
- 48806
#155Huh? He was blanketed on Gronk with both arms dragging Gronk to the ground. I was on the Under so I like the outcome but you cannot honestly say it wasn't a PI.
Now, I've heard on many occasions that refs won't call a penalty on the last play of the game and that one proved true.
Originally posted by thetrinityit wasnt interference. idiot ref throws the flag and now itll be mired in controversyComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#156Of course he is the public, but that doesn't mean he has to side with the public.Originally posted by Tommy Karatehaha.....i love clowns like you. you always talk square this, square that.
look in the mirror pal....YOU are the public...
New England closed at +3 (+105) at pinnacle vs. +1 (-105) at Bovada and the total was 46 or 47 with the public big on the over. I'm no math major, but I do know that flag was getting picked up there no matter what.Comment -
thetrinitySBR Posting Legend
- 01-25-11
- 22444
#157a great game gets ruined by this garbageOriginally posted by Cuse0323It really wasn't PI but Pats backers and conspiracy nuts will be out in full force.Comment -
onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 36572
#158Originally posted by CDMKMPSo funny to see how obviously biased people get when they lose money.
Explain how that pass was catchable for Gronk regardless of what the back defender does to him
Was he gonna disappear like nightcrawler and reappear in front of the guy who picked it?
Gronk's momentum would of carried him out of bounds, the LB was just helping.
Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#159It wasn't PI. It was defensive holding. Period.Originally posted by Cuse0323It really wasn't PI but Pats backers and conspiracy nuts will be out in full force.Comment -
RubberKettleSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-28-09
- 6421
#160So you can run the receiver out of the end zoneOriginally posted by Kaabeeball was in the air. can't call illegal contact.
Bad explanation of terribly ambiguous rules
nfl no more consistent than nbaComment -
ThaTopMoronBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 04-30-10
- 27023
#161I was on Pats ML and it was a no call, good job picking up the flag
Saints already won on str8 BS... no thanks on seeing Brady win the same way a day later
you lost because of you're retarded 3rd and 1 play so suck it PatsComment -
thetrinitySBR Posting Legend
- 01-25-11
- 22444
#162pretty much. thats why it wasnt interference. if the ref hadnt thrown the flag then everyone would just go to bed. now these espn clowns get a story they can pump all nite long.Originally posted by Mac4LyfeHuh? He was blanketed on Gronk with both arms dragging Gronk to the ground. I was on the Under so I like the outcome but you cannot honestly say it wasn't a PI.
Now, I've heard on many occasions that refs won't call a penalty on the last play of the game and that one proved true.Comment -
TadaSBR Hustler
- 08-30-10
- 75
#163What a joke to end the game... That was clearly pass interference. If Gronk was not held from goal line, he would've snatch that ball.Comment -
CDMKMPSBR Wise Guy
- 10-18-12
- 774
#164ESPN crew just loves to stir the pot because controversy = ratingsComment -
Cuse0323BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-09-09
- 30169
#165Yeah cause you say Period. makes it true. At least you have some ammo to whine about for another day. Gronk had zero chance to catch it and not because of the defender.Originally posted by No coincidencesIt wasn't PI. It was defensive holding. Period.Comment -
CDMKMPSBR Wise Guy
- 10-18-12
- 774
#166The ball was thrown very poorly and there was a defender on the goalline. No way Gronk is getting to that ever, he would've had like 1/3 of a second to go 5 yards.Originally posted by TadaWhat a joke to end the game... That was clearly pass interference. If Gronk was not held from goal line, he would've snatch that ball.Comment -
SplitAcesSBR Sharp
- 09-22-12
- 434
#167Originally posted by CDMKMPSo funny to see how obviously biased people get when they lose money.
Explain how that pass was catchable for Gronk regardless of what the back defender does to him
Was he gonna disappear like nightcrawler and reappear in front of the guy who picked it?
not biased just obvious. He hugs receiver the ball was thrown to. Ref 3 feet away sees it and throws flag. Suspicious huddle and no call as refs run to locker room.
Similar to PI call on Olsen to convert a 3rd down on the big drive to take lead.
Not right.Comment -
KaabeeSBR MVP
- 01-21-06
- 2482
#168ball was in the air. PI or nothing.Originally posted by No coincidencesIt wasn't PI. It was defensive holding. Period.Comment -
bubblebuttluvSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-13-12
- 5179
#169My Patiots +7.5 cashed, but that was some bullshit at the end.
Clear Pass Interference call.
Brady is going to hate fukk Giselle tonight and he might rape the Broncos next week.Comment -
Mac4LyfeSBR Aristocracy
- 01-04-09
- 48806
#170It was very catchable if the defender wasn't draped all over him. He tried to come back to the ball real early and would have had a good shot at getting to it but not when you're impeded.
That's called PI on every play for any team, except obviously the last play of the game.
Refs don't get paid overtime so they must have a rule to get the hell out of dodge.
Dam, Belichek is the worst interview. He is so one liner with no emotion.
Originally posted by CDMKMPSo funny to see how obviously biased people get when they lose money.
Explain how that pass was catchable for Gronk regardless of what the back defender does to him
Was he gonna disappear like nightcrawler and reappear in front of the guy who picked it?Comment -
Simon GruberSBR MVP
- 05-02-13
- 2342
#171If I'm going to bet on the NFL again, it's going to be 1-3 unit max. Sure there are blowouts to be found in the card, but I'm tired of seeing bets quashed because of questionable officiating. There are plenty of other sports w/ less variance where the officiating isn't tied in as much to the outcome of a game.Comment -
VegasInsiderSBR Posting Legend
- 12-12-10
- 14593
#172It was PI!
Gronk didn't have a chance to come back to the ball because Luke was bearhugging him.
Total BSComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#173So you're saying that wasn't defensive holding?Originally posted by Cuse0323Yeah cause you say Period. makes it true. At least you have some ammo to whine about for another day. Gronk had zero chance to catch it and not because of the defender.
Because if that's true, defensive holding doesn't exist in football and should never be called.Comment -
onlookerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 36572
#174
Comment -
bubblebuttluvSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-13-12
- 5179
#175Belichek will start breaking shit in the conference room one of these days.Originally posted by Mac4LyfeIt was very catchable if the defender wasn't draped all over him. He tried to come back to the ball real early and would have had a good shot at getting to it but not when you're impeded.
That's called PI on every play for any team, except obviously the last play of the game.
Refs don't get paid overtime so they must have a rule to get the hell out of dodge.
Dam, Belichek is the worst interview. He is so one liner with no emotion.
Dude is absolutely the most valuable individual in all of the NFL.
He can make anyone winners.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
