One of the few rules in sports betting...

[t-wizzle]

...You do NOT bet against Brady as an underdog. EVER.

[lakerboy]

Well he did get blown out at saints a few years ago as +1.

[t-wizzle]

Well he did get blown out at saints a few years ago as +1.

Yes I remember that game. It's not perfect but I do know that it hits at an incredibly high rate.

[firedawg]

manning also

[Big Bear]

...You do NOT bet against Brady as an underdog. EVER.

what are the other rules?

[Ari Gold]

what are the other rules?

Don't bet against Oregon. The worst feeling in the world is watching them knowing they can score every play. Absolute nightmare. Not even worth it even if you do cover. If you do somehow take the points just don't watch the game and check in 3 and a half hours later. Save yourself the TORTURE.

[BriGuy]

what are the other rules?

Don't bet on any college road favorite with a QB who is black and #98.

[crustyme]

what are the other rules?

all-in on rams ml @ atlanta.

[GunShard]

Don't bet against Brady and Peyton Manning.

[TheMoneyShot]

Don't ever wager money against Brady, Manning, Luck, Alabama. Anyone else?

[crustyme]

...You do NOT bet against Brady as an underdog. EVER.

brady lost as an underdog vs baltimore last season, idiot.

[thetrinity]

brady lost as an underdog vs baltimore last season, idiot.

new england covered the game

[GunShard]

Don't ever wager money against Brady, Manning, Luck, Alabama. Anyone else?

Don't bet against Aaron Rodgers with home field advantage most of the time.

[importmoon]

Don't fukin bet... there was no rules on sport betting...but if there was one rule become a bookie.. never lose....

[lakerboy]

new england covered the game

Crusty is still looking into that.

[DoYouNotGetIT]

Don't bet against Aaron Rodgers with home field advantage most of the time.

That rule is so flimsy. Jags, Saints, and 49ers also didn't beat the Lions by above -7 against the Lions at Lambeau. Rodgers has lost many games at home. Manning at night is the best bet even though he technically didn't cover if you got the game when it was bet up to +16.5 Oakland.

I would agree don't bet the Bears against Rodgers, but Rodgers at home is a 60/40 bet. Which if a bet is 60/40 I don't want to be the idiot who rides that bet to 50/50 if that happened.

[t-wizzle]

brady lost as an underdog vs baltimore last season, idiot.

Fukkin idiot. Pats covered that game and you lost on Balty -2.5.

[DoYouNotGetIT]

Don't ever wager money against Brady, Manning, Luck, Alabama. Anyone else?

Alabama's Nick Saban is only 60% ATS (1-2 ATS this year). Not a rule like Manning at night, Brady as a underdog, or if Luck continues against Luck.

[DoYouNotGetIT]

Any more rules?

[crustyme]

Fukkin idiot. Pats covered that game and you lost on Balty -2.5.

you were bragging about pats ml in another thread before making this thread and now you only meant the spread? lol

if paco had lent you $100 and you put it on pats ml, because you "never bet against brady as an underdog" would you have won?

no you wouldn't have, idiot. so your bold statement is both idiotic and 100% wrong.

brady was an underdog at indy for 2006-7 playoffs.... did he win or lose?



...You do NOT bet against Brady as an underdog. EVER.

what a dumbfuk!

[GunShard]

Any more rules?

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/2539020-what-your-gambling-style.html

[Allure]

you were bragging about pats ml in another thread before making this thread and now you only meant the spread? lol

if paco had lent you $100 and you put it on pats ml, because you "never bet against brady as an underdog" would you have won?

no you wouldn't have, idiot. so your bold statement is both idiotic and 100% wrong.

brady was an underdog at indy for 2006-7 playoffs.... did he win or lose?



...You do NOT bet against Brady as an underdog. EVER.

what a dumbfuk!

paco is it you?

Let us know asap