Deemer's Picks

[jjgold]

1-14???

[BigDeem5]

Cards looked buried, Rays look decent.


ADD LAD 2.26/2.0 ml
1x/1.10 on LAD TT O 3.5

[rcene]

Cards looked buried, Rays look decent.

Rays and Moore look like shit. They are done! Sawx putting this game away right now

[pulledclear]

"Cards looked buried, Rays look decent."

That says it all..... What a goof! Buck tooth fairy, learn the game fool.

[Believeland]

"Cards looked buried, Rays look decent."

That says it all..... What a goof! Buck tooth fairy, learn the game fool.

Why are you trying to make fun of people. Weren't you the one who attempted to look sharp twice with your "bloodbath" plays and "thank me later" bullshit. Go outside and get off this board

[pulledclear]

Why are you trying to make fun of people. Weren't you the one who attempted to look sharp twice with your "bloodbath" plays and "thank me later" bullshit. Go outside and get off this board

Check out my plays inBanks thread. Then sck a dck. Thanks!

[pulledclear]

Is that a mcdummy shill.

[govolz]

Cards looked buried, Rays look decent.


ADD LAD 2.26/2.0 ml
1x/1.10 on LAD TT O 3.5

when will the 20 units plays start? 0-7 last seven... let me know when you go 20 units on a game so i can tail ya

20 units ur unit is 50$ so 2000 bet will be coming soon

but you stiff for 135 and beg for your money back bc you knew you had no chance lol

[pulledclear]

"Rays look decent."

12-2





S Q U A R E.

[rcene]

2-1 Braves

[wagerjunkie]

u guys are brutal man.

i dont seen none of yall sticking your necks out on the line, putting plays out there on the main page for you to be critiqued.

easy to sit back and pound on a keyboard at some one who is down when you ain't posting your own shit. you's are like 5th graders who calls another kid fat and feels good about it, to try and be cool, yet most of the time ur prob the fat penetrate.

I haven't seen Deem do talk shit to anyone or do anything disrespectful to anyone to deserve to being kicked while down. then again I didn't read every post of all 7 pages.

[pulledclear]

Shut up you whiny cnt. Deemer will be fine. Mcdummy will go over to reemers and they will jerk each other off over a few poppers.

[opie1988]

Shut up you whiny cnt. Deemer will be fine. Mcdummy will go over to reemers and they will jerk each other off over a few poppers.

Hey pulled queer.....if you're going to continually insult people, at least try and make your insults somewhat funny. Instead of these same stupid retreads that weren't funny the first time around.

Step up your game, pulled queer.

[leetreaper]

Cards looked buried, Rays look decent.


ADD LAD 2.26/2.0 ml
1x/1.10 on LAD TT O 3.5

Can't make this shit up...

[rcene]

Hey pulled queer.....if you're going to continually insult people, at least try and make your insults somewhat funny. Instead of these same stupid retreads that weren't funny the first time around.

Step up your game, pulled queer.

[rcene]

Can't make this shit up...

Bad stretch for the free throw shooter. He can shoot his free throws. Unfortunately, he shoots blanks with his gambling plays!

[BigDeem5]

In a rut, will bounce back.

Typical broke diks flooding in.

[pulledclear]

"rut"

[BigDeem5]

0-4 -6.98u

burial. 0 for my last 9

NFL (6-2) +6.12u
MLB (8-10-2) -6.16u
NCAAF (2-7) -6.09u

Overall: 16-19-2 -6.13u

NCAAF: 10/05 - Fade Away:

No. Ill -7 5.4/4.0
Iowa -1 2.18/2.0
Oklahoma -8.5 1.08/1.0
UCF -9 1.08/1.0
Ohio -3.5 1.08/1.0
PSU -3 1.13/1.0

Lotta fuking square plays, but my top 2 I love.

[hockey216]

just keep hitting the reset button and starting new thread every time you lose to hide real record.

[BigDeem5]

I've never seen pulledqueer, rcene, or hockey216 post bets/tickets... I'm not surprised they air bet and like to try to troll me.

If I had no $$ in an offshore account and played for points, I'd probably have nothing better to do too.

[t-wizzle]

I told you from the getgo that this thread won't end well.

Keep trying I guess.

[hockey216]

Deemer, i am not trolling because of your record. I don't troll people even if they go 0-100. I just think its an ethical/honesty/fair disclosure issue. When you manipulate records by omissions (omitting losing plays from record, which are key facts), it is misleading. Someone could come in, think that you are 5-0 when you are really 8-20 or something, and then be enticed to gamble on your plays and lose money due to your omitting key facts and posting false misleading record. I'm not trolling your picks or your losses. I don't care if you lose every game. i'm ok with that. i just want you to provide honest records without omissions. You shouldn't fabricate a record by omitting losses. I don't mean to troll. I would just prefer if you provide full, fair, accurate, honest disclosure without omitting key facts (losing plays).

If a financial advisor told client "my portfolio is up 20% this year" when he was really down 15% because he manipulated or erased every losing month from his record, he would lose his license, get sued, be fined, and be thrown in jail. That is what Bernard Madoff did (lied about actual record). Fraud is a misrepresentation of fact. I have no problem with your losses. I just believe in accurate records without omissions. I just want honesty. I would rather someone post honest record of 0-100 than lie about record being 10-12. Thank you. have a nice day.

[pulledclear]

I've never seen pulledqueer, rcene, or hockey216 post bets/tickets... I'm not surprised they air bet and like to try to troll me.

If I had no $$ in an offshore account and played for points, I'd probably have nothing better to do too.

Get your teeth fixed you fckng half a fairy.

[BennyBigNuts]

Get your teeth fixed you fckng half a fairy.

Damn, give the kid a break.

Take it easy bro. I know you like to hammer everyone on here, I actually love a lot of your posts because you make me laugh.
You know threads like these have very little chance of being + money. Let Deemer do what he does and enjoy himself.

I think E-battles can be acceptable as long as you're making your own threads and plays, giving your own input on games, not just trolling and making it lopsided. Start posting some picks and giving your insight on games, then go at whoever you want. Make the playing field even.

[BigDeem5]

I told you from the getgo that this thread won't end well.

Keep trying I guess.

t-wizzle, you've never tracked a thread...

It's easy to post a spot winner once a week and lose your other 3 and bump your winner.

I ain't here for the glory hole celebration, I am fuking king.

[BigDeem5]

Deemer, i am not trolling because of your record. I don't troll people even if they go 0-100. I just think its an ethical/honesty/fair disclosure issue. When you manipulate records by omissions (omitting losing plays from record, which are key facts), it is misleading. Someone could come in, think that you are 5-0 when you are really 8-20 or something, and then be enticed to gamble on your plays and lose money due to your omitting key facts and posting false misleading record. I'm not trolling your picks or your losses. I don't care if you lose every game. i'm ok with that. i just want you to provide honest records without omissions. You shouldn't fabricate a record by omitting losses. I don't mean to troll. I would just prefer if you provide full, fair, accurate, honest disclosure without omitting key facts (losing plays).

If a financial advisor told client "my portfolio is up 20% this year" when he was really down 15% because he manipulated or erased every losing month from his record, he would lose his license, get sued, be fined, and be thrown in jail. That is what Bernard Madoff did (lied about actual record). Fraud is a misrepresentation of fact. I have no problem with your losses. I just believe in accurate records without omissions. I just want honesty. I would rather someone post honest record of 0-100 than lie about record being 10-12. Thank you. have a nice day.

First, you sound like a fuking broken recorder, no need to repeat yourself, I ain't fukking konck.

Second, I've never omitted losses, I track this thread accurately. Get a fukin clue.

[billysink]

0-4 -6.98u

burial. 0 for my last 9

NFL (6-2) +6.12u
MLB (8-10-2) -6.16u
NCAAF (2-7) -6.09u

Overall: 16-19-2 -6.13u

NCAAF: 10/05 - Fade Away:

No. Ill -7 5.4/4.0
Iowa -1 2.18/2.0
Oklahoma -8.5 1.08/1.0
UCF -9 1.08/1.0
Ohio -3.5 1.08/1.0
PSU -3 1.13/1.0

Lotta fuking square plays, but my top 2 I love.

.

Square sharp or not, you now have 12 units in play. 30% of your bankroll @ standard unit size, including a monstrous 12.5% on one play. You may or may not hit that play but have exposed yourself to disaster.

You refuse to acknowledge even the most rudimentary rules of gaming. Your handicapping ability is nowhere near what it needs to be to substantiate the wagering strategy you employ.

The proof is in the pudding of deleted spreadsheets, this thread, across multiple forums in black white and cyberspace.

There is no need to respond. All of your brash, know it all chatter cannot make it right.

[jjgold]

Billy good points but lets be positive , I know your trying to help the kid.

Billy when I come to Detroit we will drink Brandy and smoke weed and laugh this all off

[t-wizzle]

t-wizzle, you've never tracked a thread...

It's easy to post a spot winner once a week and lose your other 3 and bump your winner.

I ain't here for the glory hole celebration, I am fuking king.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basketball-betting/2305962-wizzles-2013-nba-playoff-thread.html

[BigDeem5]

Iowa bang, starting to get in a groove

[Noleafclover]

i dont seen none of yall sticking your necks out on the line, putting plays out there on the main page for you to be critiqued.

Check my thread. I'd love a bump to the first page. Seems like you either have to be a loser or talk big to get a response around here though. Apparently 6-0 doesn't cut it. Maybe after this week, when it's 9-0, someone will have something to say.

[pulledclear]

0-4 -6.98u

burial. 0 for my last 9

NFL (6-2) +6.12u
MLB (8-10-2) -6.16u
NCAAF (2-7) -6.09u

Overall: 16-19-2 -6.13u

NCAAF: 10/05 - Fade Away:

No. Ill -7 5.4/4.0
Iowa -1 2.18/2.0
Oklahoma -8.5 1.08/1.0
UCF -9 1.08/1.0
Ohio -3.5 1.08/1.0
PSU -3 1.13/1.0

Lotta fuking square plays, but my top 2 I love.

Holy sht Reemer you might go 3-3. Your coming out of your "rut".

[hockey216]

First, you sound like a fuking broken recorder, no need to repeat yourself, I ain't fukking konck.

Second, I've never omitted losses, I track this thread accurately. Get a fukin clue.

never omitted losses? you are a liar. how many different mlb threads have you made? Where are your first couple weeks of nfl? you make new thread every time you lose so you have a million different records all that hide your real record.

[pulledclear]

Iowa bang, starting to get in a groove