Into The Weekend w/ BetDSI 9/19 - Sharp and Public Action for NFL Wk 3, NCAAF Wk 4

[SBRPicks]

SBR Videos host Peter Loshak welcomes Brent, the Head Lines Manager at BetDSI Sportsbook, to discuss the betting action he has seen for the upcoming weekend's major sporting events.

In this week's episode, Brent and Loshak discuss NFL week 3, and college football Week 4.


Part 1: NFL Week 3
<iframe src="http://www.sbrforum.com/video/embed/?videoId=15781" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="330" width="560"></iframe>


Part 2: NCAAF Week 4
<iframe src="http://www.sbrforum.com/video/embed/?videoId=15780" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="330" width="560"></iframe>

[TwoWays]

[hockey216]

hey peter, if you like seattle -19, how come last year when jacksonville was +16 vs green bay (WITHOUT maurice jones drew), you were lecturing swinging johnson that jacksonville is still an nfl team, and no nfl team should ever be a 16 pt favorite over another nfl team. You said it reminded you of how you won the beat the prick contest because the 2nd place guy made a foolish bet on new england -14.5 and of course they didn't even come close to covering. 1 week later after jacksonville covered (only lost by 9) you said anytime you have bad nfl team playing awesome team and getting 18 pts or whatever, your advice was to always take the bad team getting the points. You said this in 2nd video (skip to 1:30). I feel your advice to lay -19.5 on seattle contradicts your advice last year (that jacksonville still nfl team and nfl team should never be 20 point favorite over another nfl team, and that you should always take the bad team getting the 19 points). Can you clarify this please? If your advice last year was correct and you should always take the bad team getting the 19 points, why do you like seattle -19? I feel like you have been giving conflicting advice, and would appreciate your clarification. thank you peter. have a nice day.

[CarpeDime]

hey peter, if you like seattle -19, how come last year when jacksonville was +16 vs green bay (WITHOUT maurice jones drew), you were lecturing swinging johnson that jacksonville is still an nfl team, and no nfl team should ever be a 16 pt favorite over another nfl team. You said it reminded you of how you won the beat the prick contest because the 2nd place guy made a foolish bet on new england -14.5 and of course they didn't even come close to covering. 1 week later after jacksonville covered (only lost by 9) you said anytime you have bad nfl team playing awesome team and getting 18 pts or whatever, your advice was to always take the bad team getting the points. I feel your advice to lay -19.5 on seattle contradicts your advice last year (that jacksonville still nfl team and nfl team should never be 20 point favorite over another nfl team, and that you should always take the bad team getting the 19 points). Can you clarify this please? If your advice last year was correct and you should always take the bad team getting the 19 points, why do you like seattle -19? I feel like you have been giving conflicting advice, and would appreciate your clarification. thank you peter. have a nice day.

damn you are one fukin ON THE BALL dude!!!!

Yes, very sorry for the confusion, I was just kidding when I said I was an inch away from going all-in on Seattle -19.5. No way would I touch that line. I believe later on in the vid I expressed a bit of incredulity regarding the public biting on that line even to the modest extent that Brent said they did.

It was just a spur-of-the-moment unclear ironic comment.

YOU ARE FUKIN GOOD THOUGH BRO!!

[hockey216]

Ok. Thank you for the clarification, Peter. I was leaning on jacksonville based on your advice last year that no nfl team should ever be more than a 16 point favorite. LT Profits also posted that underdogs over 18 or 19 or something are 9-3 ATS in the NFL going back to 1985. It confused me a bit when you said you loved seattle and were talking about how Seattle was a "sharp side" based on that 1 sharp's bet. I remembered explicitly your advice last year was to "always take the bad team getting the points" in these situations regardless if its awful team vs super bowl champs, 3rd string, whatever. I felt there was a bit of a contradiction. Now that i see that you were joking about loving seattle, it makes more sense. Thank you for the clarification, Peter. Have a nice day.

[kincade]

Damn, Brent just keeps handing out winners!

[jjgold]

Good info

Guy is 10 better than that dumb fuk Doc from Legends

[Joe D. 416]

Sharps way off in NFL this week.

[daddypoker23]

DSI,bookmaker, and Betchris same owners?

[hockey216]

maybe nfl teams should be 20 point favorites?