BetPhoenix says Tennis is considered a Prop Bet. WTF?!?!?

Chi_archie · 08-24-13, 01:04 PM

I think a total for sets is a prop bet

but a ML pick on a winner would not be considered a prop bet.

I would think you just got a clerk who did not know how to word it.

so no Tennis should not be considered a prop bet

yisman · 08-24-13, 01:05 PM

I think they really do lump tennis in with props there.

At Betmania I got limited to 25 a bet on props, and that includes tennis.

Obviously tennis (betmania doesn't offer spreads, totals, or props for tennis, just ML) shouldn't be considered a prop, though...

wagerjunkie · 08-24-13, 01:07 PM

they better not consider MMA prop bets

wagerjunkie · 08-24-13, 01:11 PM

they were offering a nice 100% bonus.. I am just looking to double or triple my roll and get the hell out of there and get back over to Heritage if things go according to plan.

Hardcoar · 08-24-13, 01:14 PM

They can define proposition as whatever the hell they want. If you accept their terms you can suck it and wager your free bet on something not considered a prop.

wagerjunkie · 08-24-13, 08:28 PM

Originally posted by wagerjunkie

they better not consider MMA prop bets

and....they do....

wagerjunkie · 08-24-13, 08:30 PM

I actually got lucky and had Monfils match over 22.5. Monfils retired in 2nd set. they returned my free play funds. even though free play are not allowed on props and they consider tennis a prop. so I can't rag on them.

rm18 · 08-24-13, 09:47 PM

MLB 1st 5 is a prop there too bubble gum bookie they banned me when my account was broke because they were scared

wagerjunkie · 08-24-13, 09:53 PM

Originally posted by rm18

MLB 1st 5 is a prop there too bubble gum bookie they banned me when my account was broke because they were scared

no I made sure to specifically ask about that and they said 1st fives are fine.

rm18 · 08-24-13, 10:02 PM

I know they told me I could not parlay MLB 1st 5 because it was a prop though was like 4 years ago