Phil Mickelson or Tiger Woods? 2013

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • will2survive
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 11-26-09
    • 8099

    #1
    Phil Mickelson or Tiger Woods? 2013
    Although Phil's career is more well-rounded, 14-5 in majors is no comparison. Phil has a lot of 2nd places and that's overlooked. Tiger is playing great golf again, but has actually switched roles as a choker. This comparison would be closer if Phil never took so many risks.

    Tiger clearly has the better body of work, but right now, Phil Mickelson "Is playing better golf". He has totally narrowed the gap and I see him winning another 2 to 3 majors.

    Woods hasn't won a major since 2008!!!. If Phil gets on a role, this might get in Tiger's mindset and the gap will narrow even further. Phil's final round at the British Open is more impressive than anything that I've seen Tiger do.
  • Cuse0323
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 12-09-09
    • 30169

    #2
    Phil's career isn't more well-rounded nor is he playing better golf, not even close.
    Comment
    • Slimpickens
      SBR MVP
      • 10-28-12
      • 2030

      #3
      Phil is playing better golf??
      Comment
      • jjgold
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 07-20-05
        • 388208

        #4
        Tiger miles ahead of him

        Compare all tourneys both have been in this year
        Comment
        • d2bets
          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
          • 08-10-05
          • 39847

          #5
          How is Phil's career more well-rounded? Tiger's win rate is around 27%. Mickelson is 9%, I believe. Phil is 2nd best of the last 20 years, but still miles behind Tiger, both for career and also current form.
          Comment
          • InTheDrink
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 11-23-09
            • 23983

            #6
            Comment
            Search
            Collapse
            SBR Contests
            Collapse
            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
            Collapse
            Working...